| 查看: 2083 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
clean-soil,air,water什么情况,修改前都快接收了,最后拒稿?
|
|||
|
类似经验:http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=4402131 昨晚看到这篇帖子,结果今天就悲剧了,大家看看吧,求安慰,求建议! 1. On clen.201200236.R1: Editor: Bandyopadhyay, Amitava Comments to the Author: The reviewer comments are now available that suggest minor revision. I have also read the MS and it is more or less acceptable. But I am unable to accept the authors following response: "The trends of OMA formation efficiency are similar in other experiments conducted with different initial oil concentrations. However, there are only two representatives’ been described. Because putting all data in same figure will make it difficult to read." Authors must show such variation : Shaking time (x-axis) vs E% (y-axis) at various oil concentration (at least four) for the two types [in an additional Fig (a) & in Fig (b)]. A few lines may be added in the relevant portion of the text (R&D Section). The manuscript is still require some revision as described above. 2. On clen.201200236.R2 Comments to the Author: The manuscript can now be acceptable considering the extent of revision made by the Authors. For clarity, minor corrections/changes are however, suggested on the manuscript which is attached. The authors have made a great effort. Thanks to them. 3. On clen.201200236.R3 The paper has been substantially corrected now. However, three minor corrections as noted are to be incorporated. Attached is your submitted revised version with those corrections indicated thereto. Show a sample calculation for the ratio of mineral to dispersed oil as indicated in the relevant portion of the text. Thanks for your great effort. 4. For clen.201200236.R4 The manuscript has not been revised in accordance with the requirements of our Journal and hence it is recommended that the Manuscript be rejected. 都按照要求改了,不知道怎么最后就给了这么个结论!主编貌似也是不看的,每次都是cc给这个Editor: Bandyopadhyay, Amitava 主编回信:I am sorry to inform you that your revised manuscript, "Enhanced Oil-Mineral Aggregation with Modified Bentonite", has not been found acceptable for publication in "CLEAN - Soil, Air, Water". The journal receives many more manuscripts than it can publish and difficult decisions must be made on the basis of an article's perceived priority. Your manuscript did not achieve a high enough ranking to be accepted. While disappointing, I must emphasize that this decision is final. 不知道该如何申诉~~~请大牛给意见。 [ Last edited by lisa1985 on 2012-8-22 at 12:39 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有85人回复
感觉是下周放榜了
已经有9人回复
filecode=后面第一个是大写字母
已经有10人回复
时间戳变了,能看出什么问题?
已经有4人回复
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜?
已经有15人回复
今天系统多次维护,明天很可能放榜!
已经有9人回复
时间戳又变了8-15
已经有25人回复
2027广东省杰青
已经有6人回复
快农历七夕节了,轻松一下,男人悄悄话,女施主请不要进来。
已经有3人回复
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有26人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
JPS投稿接收了
已经有26人回复
WM with editor 一个月,正常吗?
已经有3人回复
投desalination and water treatment,如何知道投稿是否成功?
已经有6人回复
圣诞前一天文章莫名其妙被拒稿,申诉成功后今天戏剧接收
已经有231人回复
因为语言等细节问题被拒稿,修改后重投给原来的杂志收的可能性大么?
已经有9人回复
【Pure water】I am happy that they are very busy.
已经有9人回复
请问:修改稿如果不按照审稿人的意见修改,会被拒掉么
已经有14人回复
文章接收后修改投稿单位
已经有12人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
2026年财务管理、经济与信息技术国际会议 (FMEIT 2026)
+1/521
今天看到省基金挂了,希望国基面上能中吧
+5/390
合肥工业大学能源动力方向教师招聘~
+5/390
发个小问卷!并且祈福!基金必中中中!!
+4/282
合肥工业大学能源动力方向教师招聘~
+1/91
生物力学科研设备推荐
+1/90
中国科学院空天院精密干涉测量团队招聘光学/算法/机械方向博士后/特别研究助理
+1/80
中国科学院空天院精密干涉测量团队招聘光学/算法/机械方向博士后/特别研究助理/工程师
+1/78
广西大学 化学化工学院 新入职教师招生 化学、化学工程与技术、材料化工专业
+1/47
中国科大-合肥国家实验室冷原子量子网络团队招聘启事
+2/34
加拿大/英属哥伦比亚大学曹彦凯课题组招收全奖博士/博后 [机器人/控制方向]
+1/29
华南理工大学招2027年生物材料、药物递送申请考核制博士生
+1/24
北京理工大学-集成电路与电子学院杰青团队-招博士后
+1/6
27推免-广州医科大学封红亮教授招收精神医学应用心理学推免生
+1/5
2026年生物学、大数据与信息工程国际会议 (BSBIE 2026)
+1/3
中国科学院生物物理研究所田勇课题组招聘联合培养生
+1/3
南京医科大学-冯璋课题组-招收2027级生化与分子生物学专业博士和硕士研究生
+1/3
中山大学具身智能方向招2027届考核制博士生
+1/3
海南大学化学院—功能分子器件团队2027博士招生+博士后招聘
+1/2
国家级人才团队诚聘生物信息相关专业的科研助理
+1/1
7楼2012-09-14 23:17:42
3楼2012-09-14 19:10:10
4楼2012-09-14 22:04:15
5楼2012-09-14 22:20:24










回复此楼