应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » clean-soil,air,water什么情况，修改前都快接收了，最后拒稿？
51/1返回列表
查看: 2141  |  回复: 6
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lisa1985

铁虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] clean-soil,air,water什么情况，修改前都快接收了，最后拒稿？

类似经验：http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=4402131
昨晚看到这篇帖子，结果今天就悲剧了，大家看看吧，求安慰，求建议！
1.  On clen.201200236.R1:
Editor: Bandyopadhyay, Amitava
Comments to the Author:
The reviewer comments are now available that suggest minor revision. I have also read the MS and it is more or less acceptable. But I am unable to accept the authors following response:
"The trends of OMA formation efficiency are similar in other experiments conducted with different initial oil concentrations. However, there are only two representatives’ been described. Because putting all data in same figure will make it difficult to read."
Authors must show such variation : Shaking time (x-axis) vs E% (y-axis) at various oil concentration (at least four) for the two types [in an additional Fig (a) & in Fig (b)]. A few lines may be added in the relevant portion of the text (R&D Section).
The manuscript is still require some revision as described above.  
2. On clen.201200236.R2
Comments to the Author:
The manuscript can now be acceptable considering the extent of revision made by the Authors. For clarity, minor corrections/changes are however, suggested on the manuscript which is attached. The authors have made a great effort. Thanks to them.
3. On clen.201200236.R3
The paper has been substantially corrected now. However, three minor corrections as noted are to be incorporated. Attached is your submitted revised version with those corrections indicated thereto. Show a sample calculation for the ratio of mineral to dispersed oil as indicated in the relevant portion of the text. Thanks for your great effort.  
4. For clen.201200236.R4
The manuscript has not been revised in accordance with the requirements of our Journal and hence it is recommended that the Manuscript be rejected.
都按照要求改了，不知道怎么最后就给了这么个结论！主编貌似也是不看的，每次都是cc给这个Editor: Bandyopadhyay, Amitava
主编回信：I am sorry to inform you that your revised manuscript, "Enhanced Oil-Mineral Aggregation with Modified Bentonite", has not been found acceptable for publication in "CLEAN - Soil, Air, Water". The journal receives many more manuscripts than it can publish and difficult decisions must be made on the basis of an article's perceived priority. Your manuscript did not achieve a high enough ranking to be accepted. While disappointing, I must emphasize that this decision is final.

不知道该如何申诉~~~请大牛给意见。

[ Last edited by lisa1985 on 2012-8-22 at 12:39 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴
1楼 2012-08-22 10:35:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

本女神名自由

新虫 (小有名气)
引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by _pwr at 2012-09-14 22:20:24
正常，所以word我一般都用03的，国外word软件要掏钱的

国外大多都用pdf了。还好应该不会出现这种悲剧
赞一下 回复此楼
7楼2012-09-14 23:17:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 7 个回答

本女神名自由

新虫 (小有名气)
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
这个杂志的最大特点就是你推荐的审稿人一般会被采纳。所以我推荐了几个国内的熟人就比较顺利被录用了。
也可能是录用太多了，稿件排不开了？。。我们周围就有很多人投。
不过投稿是靠运气的。
本人还遇到过因为人家07版word打不开直接把我给拒了呢。尼玛还等了4个多月。
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2012-09-14 19:10:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

苹果香味

新虫 (初入文坛)
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by 本女神名自由 at 2012-09-14 19:10:10
这个杂志的最大特点就是你推荐的审稿人一般会被采纳。所以我推荐了几个国内的熟人就比较顺利被录用了。
也可能是录用太多了，稿件排不开了？。。我们周围就有很多人投。
不过投稿是靠运气的。
本人还遇到过因为人 ...

07版word打不开...................这样的期刊有点不负责吧
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2012-09-14 22:04:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

_pwr

新虫 (小有名气)
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
正常，所以word我一般都用03的，国外word软件要掏钱的
赞一下 回复此楼
5楼2012-09-14 22:20:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 7 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭