24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3241)
>虫友互识 (279)
>导师招生 (231)
>文献求助 (144)
>休闲灌水 (138)
>教师之家 (96)
>考博 (88)
>基金申请 (87)
>论文投稿 (73)
>考研 (62)
>硕博家园 (54)
>找工作 (50)
>论文道贺祈福 (42)
>博后之家 (41)
>招聘信息布告栏 (40)
>公派出国 (23)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lisa1985

铁虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 7.2
帖子: 37
在线: 23.9小时
虫号: 861621

[交流] clean-soil,air,water什么情况，修改前都快接收了，最后拒稿？

类似经验：http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=4402131
昨晚看到这篇帖子，结果今天就悲剧了，大家看看吧，求安慰，求建议！
1.  On clen.201200236.R1:
Editor: Bandyopadhyay, Amitava
Comments to the Author:
The reviewer comments are now available that suggest minor revision. I have also read the MS and it is more or less acceptable. But I am unable to accept the authors following response:
"The trends of OMA formation efficiency are similar in other experiments conducted with different initial oil concentrations. However, there are only two representatives’ been described. Because putting all data in same figure will make it difficult to read."
Authors must show such variation : Shaking time (x-axis) vs E% (y-axis) at various oil concentration (at least four) for the two types [in an additional Fig (a) & in Fig (b)]. A few lines may be added in the relevant portion of the text (R&D Section).
The manuscript is still require some revision as described above.
2. On clen.201200236.R2
Comments to the Author:
The manuscript can now be acceptable considering the extent of revision made by the Authors. For clarity, minor corrections/changes are however, suggested on the manuscript which is attached. The authors have made a great effort. Thanks to them.
3. On clen.201200236.R3
The paper has been substantially corrected now. However, three minor corrections as noted are to be incorporated. Attached is your submitted revised version with those corrections indicated thereto. Show a sample calculation for the ratio of mineral to dispersed oil as indicated in the relevant portion of the text. Thanks for your great effort.
4. For clen.201200236.R4
The manuscript has not been revised in accordance with the requirements of our Journal and hence it is recommended that the Manuscript be rejected.
都按照要求改了，不知道怎么最后就给了这么个结论！主编貌似也是不看的，每次都是cc给这个Editor: Bandyopadhyay, Amitava
主编回信：I am sorry to inform you that your revised manuscript, "Enhanced Oil-Mineral Aggregation with Modified Bentonite", has not been found acceptable for publication in "CLEAN - Soil, Air, Water". The journal receives many more manuscripts than it can publish and difficult decisions must be made on the basis of an article's perceived priority. Your manuscript did not achieve a high enough ranking to be accepted. While disappointing, I must emphasize that this decision is final.

不知道该如何申诉~~~请大牛给意见。

[ Last edited by lisa1985 on 2012-8-22 at 12:39 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

JPS投稿接收了已经有26人回复
WM with editor 一个月，正常吗？已经有3人回复
投desalination and water treatment，如何知道投稿是否成功？已经有6人回复
圣诞前一天文章莫名其妙被拒稿，申诉成功后今天戏剧接收已经有231人回复
因为语言等细节问题被拒稿，修改后重投给原来的杂志收的可能性大么？已经有9人回复
【Pure water】I am happy that they are very busy. 已经有9人回复
请问：修改稿如果不按照审稿人的意见修改，会被拒掉么已经有14人回复
文章接收后修改投稿单位已经有12人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2012-08-22 10:35:12

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

苹果香味

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
金币: 48.8
帖子: 14
在线: 11.7小时
虫号: 1993331

★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖

引用回帖:

3楼: Originally posted by 本女神名自由 at 2012-09-14 19:10:10
这个杂志的最大特点就是你推荐的审稿人一般会被采纳。所以我推荐了几个国内的熟人就比较顺利被录用了。
也可能是录用太多了，稿件排不开了？。。我们周围就有很多人投。
不过投稿是靠运气的。
本人还遇到过因为人 ...

07版word打不开...................这样的期刊有点不负责吧