| 查看: 1810 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
clean-soil,air,water什么情况，修改前都快接收了，最后拒稿？
|
|||
|
类似经验：http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=4402131 昨晚看到这篇帖子，结果今天就悲剧了，大家看看吧，求安慰，求建议！ 1. On clen.201200236.R1: Editor: Bandyopadhyay, Amitava Comments to the Author: The reviewer comments are now available that suggest minor revision. I have also read the MS and it is more or less acceptable. But I am unable to accept the authors following response: "The trends of OMA formation efficiency are similar in other experiments conducted with different initial oil concentrations. However, there are only two representatives’ been described. Because putting all data in same figure will make it difficult to read." Authors must show such variation : Shaking time (x-axis) vs E% (y-axis) at various oil concentration (at least four) for the two types [in an additional Fig (a) & in Fig (b)]. A few lines may be added in the relevant portion of the text (R&D Section). The manuscript is still require some revision as described above. 2. On clen.201200236.R2 Comments to the Author: The manuscript can now be acceptable considering the extent of revision made by the Authors. For clarity, minor corrections/changes are however, suggested on the manuscript which is attached. The authors have made a great effort. Thanks to them. 3. On clen.201200236.R3 The paper has been substantially corrected now. However, three minor corrections as noted are to be incorporated. Attached is your submitted revised version with those corrections indicated thereto. Show a sample calculation for the ratio of mineral to dispersed oil as indicated in the relevant portion of the text. Thanks for your great effort. 4. For clen.201200236.R4 The manuscript has not been revised in accordance with the requirements of our Journal and hence it is recommended that the Manuscript be rejected. 都按照要求改了，不知道怎么最后就给了这么个结论！主编貌似也是不看的，每次都是cc给这个Editor: Bandyopadhyay, Amitava 主编回信：I am sorry to inform you that your revised manuscript, "Enhanced Oil-Mineral Aggregation with Modified Bentonite", has not been found acceptable for publication in "CLEAN - Soil, Air, Water". The journal receives many more manuscripts than it can publish and difficult decisions must be made on the basis of an article's perceived priority. Your manuscript did not achieve a high enough ranking to be accepted. While disappointing, I must emphasize that this decision is final. 不知道该如何申诉~~~请大牛给意见。 [ Last edited by lisa1985 on 2012-8-22 at 12:39 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
免疫学博士有名额，速联系
已经有12人回复
-
面上基金申报没有其他的参与者成吗
已经有4人回复
-
退学或坚持读
已经有16人回复
-
青椒八年已不青，大家都被折磨成啥样了？
已经有16人回复
-
国家基金申请书模板内插入图片不可调整大小?
已经有8人回复
-
多组分精馏求助
已经有6人回复
-
国家级人才课题组招收2026年入学博士
已经有6人回复
-
交叉科学部支持青年基金，对三无青椒是个机会吗？
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- JPS投稿接收了
已经有26人回复
- WM with editor 一个月，正常吗？
已经有3人回复
- 投desalination and water treatment，如何知道投稿是否成功？
已经有6人回复
- 圣诞前一天文章莫名其妙被拒稿，申诉成功后今天戏剧接收
已经有231人回复
- 因为语言等细节问题被拒稿，修改后重投给原来的杂志收的可能性大么？
已经有9人回复
- 【Pure water】I am happy that they are very busy.
已经有9人回复
- 请问：修改稿如果不按照审稿人的意见修改，会被拒掉么
已经有14人回复
- 文章接收后修改投稿单位
已经有12人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
哈尔滨工程大学青岛创新发展基地招聘青年教师
+1/468
-
电力全国重点实验室双一流A类长江学者团队招2026年全日制博士1-2名/博士后
+2/92
-
【2026/2027 哈工大计算机类博士招生】
+1/78
-
西北工业大学民航学院复合材料领域招聘两名博后
+1/76
-
“超分子材料交叉研究团队”联合诚聘博士后 [清华/吉大/复旦/北大]
+1/74
-
非粮生物质能技术全国重点实验室合成生物学创新团队全球招聘博士/博士后
+1/74
-
关于本子打包
+1/64
-
大连工业大学 超临界流体技术团队（纺材学院）招收2026级“申请-考核制”博士生
+1/55
-
南方医科大学生物医学工程学院招收申请考核制博士生2名、博士后2名（2026）
+1/32
-
太原理工大学集成电路学院院长团队招收2026年博士研究生
+1/10
-
【博士招生】哈工大（深圳）智能学部机器人与先进制造学院 陆文杰老师课题组
+1/10
-
诚征女友，非诚勿扰
+3/8
-
【博士后/科研助理招聘-北京理工大学-集成电路与电子学院-国家杰青团队】
+1/8
-
邵阳学院食品与化学工程学院硕士调剂
+1/7
-
Comfyui 云平台创作AI应用
+1/6
-
华南理工大学宋波教授联合唐本忠院士招聘化学和材料方向博士后（长期有效）
+1/5
-
武汉工程大学董志兵教授课题组招收博士/硕士研究生（长期有效）
+1/4
-
澳科大诚招2026年秋季全奖博士研究生（药剂学/生物材料方向）
+1/2
-
广东以色列理工学院博士/硕士招生-通过稀疏观测用数据驱动方法预测湍流
+1/1
-
苏州大学医学院纳米生物医学方向招收申请考核制博士生1名
+1/1
3楼2012-09-14 19:10:10
4楼2012-09-14 22:04:15
5楼2012-09-14 22:20:24
6楼2012-09-14 23:16:42