| 查看: 2082 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
clean-soil,air,water什么情况，修改前都快接收了，最后拒稿？
|
|||
|
类似经验：http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=4402131 昨晚看到这篇帖子，结果今天就悲剧了，大家看看吧，求安慰，求建议！ 1. On clen.201200236.R1: Editor: Bandyopadhyay, Amitava Comments to the Author: The reviewer comments are now available that suggest minor revision. I have also read the MS and it is more or less acceptable. But I am unable to accept the authors following response: "The trends of OMA formation efficiency are similar in other experiments conducted with different initial oil concentrations. However, there are only two representatives’ been described. Because putting all data in same figure will make it difficult to read." Authors must show such variation : Shaking time (x-axis) vs E% (y-axis) at various oil concentration (at least four) for the two types [in an additional Fig (a) & in Fig (b)]. A few lines may be added in the relevant portion of the text (R&D Section). The manuscript is still require some revision as described above. 2. On clen.201200236.R2 Comments to the Author: The manuscript can now be acceptable considering the extent of revision made by the Authors. For clarity, minor corrections/changes are however, suggested on the manuscript which is attached. The authors have made a great effort. Thanks to them. 3. On clen.201200236.R3 The paper has been substantially corrected now. However, three minor corrections as noted are to be incorporated. Attached is your submitted revised version with those corrections indicated thereto. Show a sample calculation for the ratio of mineral to dispersed oil as indicated in the relevant portion of the text. Thanks for your great effort. 4. For clen.201200236.R4 The manuscript has not been revised in accordance with the requirements of our Journal and hence it is recommended that the Manuscript be rejected. 都按照要求改了，不知道怎么最后就给了这么个结论！主编貌似也是不看的，每次都是cc给这个Editor: Bandyopadhyay, Amitava 主编回信：I am sorry to inform you that your revised manuscript, "Enhanced Oil-Mineral Aggregation with Modified Bentonite", has not been found acceptable for publication in "CLEAN - Soil, Air, Water". The journal receives many more manuscripts than it can publish and difficult decisions must be made on the basis of an article's perceived priority. Your manuscript did not achieve a high enough ranking to be accepted. While disappointing, I must emphasize that this decision is final. 不知道该如何申诉~~~请大牛给意见。 [ Last edited by lisa1985 on 2012-8-22 at 12:39 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有84人回复
-
感觉是下周放榜了
已经有8人回复
-
filecode=后面第一个是大写字母
已经有10人回复
-
时间戳变了，能看出什么问题？
已经有4人回复
-
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜？
已经有15人回复
-
今天系统多次维护，明天很可能放榜！
已经有9人回复
-
时间戳又变了8-15
已经有25人回复
-
2027广东省杰青
已经有6人回复
-
快农历七夕节了，轻松一下，男人悄悄话，女施主请不要进来。
已经有3人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有26人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- JPS投稿接收了
已经有26人回复
- WM with editor 一个月，正常吗？
已经有3人回复
- 投desalination and water treatment，如何知道投稿是否成功？
已经有6人回复
- 圣诞前一天文章莫名其妙被拒稿，申诉成功后今天戏剧接收
已经有231人回复
- 因为语言等细节问题被拒稿，修改后重投给原来的杂志收的可能性大么？
已经有9人回复
- 【Pure water】I am happy that they are very busy.
已经有9人回复
- 请问：修改稿如果不按照审稿人的意见修改，会被拒掉么
已经有14人回复
- 文章接收后修改投稿单位
已经有12人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
期待你的到来
+1/366
-
Data征稿（EI检索收录），选题方向：环境风险管理的数据分析
+5/285
-
西安交大马伟/王亚洲课题组诚聘联培博士和硕士学生多名-有机生物电子学方向
+1/180
-
生物力学科研设备推荐
+1/90
-
好久没有来了，回来看看。
+1/86
-
中国科学院空天院精密干涉测量团队 精密机械结构工程师招聘启事
+1/80
-
中国科学院空天院精密干涉测量团队招聘光学/算法/机械方向博士后/特别研究助理
+1/80
-
中国科学院空天院精密干涉测量团队招聘光学/算法/机械方向博士后/特别研究助理/工程师
+1/78
-
广东医科大学博士后招聘-基础医学，生信等方向
+1/38
-
中国科大-合肥国家实验室冷原子量子网络团队招聘启事
+2/34
-
天津大学环境学院童银栋教授招收博士后（生源要素循环/温室效应/新污染物方向）
+1/30
-
清华大学深圳国际研究生院招聘-博士后（长期有效）
+1/29
-
加拿大/英属哥伦比亚大学曹彦凯课题组招收全奖博士/博后 [机器人/控制方向]
+1/29
-
华南理工大学招2027年生物材料、药物递送申请考核制博士生
+1/24
-
论文祈福
+1/7
-
中国科学院生态环境研究中心环境工程相关方向招收保送硕士和联合培养博士和硕士研究生
+1/4
-
2026年生物学、大数据与信息工程国际会议 (BSBIE 2026)
+1/3
-
河海大学海洋环境污染与生态毒理学研究组招收2027级硕士生 及博士研究生
+1/3
-
UTS 招收2027年入学博士生
+1/3
-
希望这篇论文能中
+2/2
5楼2012-09-14 22:20:24
3楼2012-09-14 19:10:10
4楼2012-09-14 22:04:15
6楼2012-09-14 23:16:42
