| 查看: 1712 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
clean-soil,air,water什么情况，修改前都快接收了，最后拒稿？
|
|||
|
类似经验：http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=4402131 昨晚看到这篇帖子，结果今天就悲剧了，大家看看吧，求安慰，求建议！ 1. On clen.201200236.R1: Editor: Bandyopadhyay, Amitava Comments to the Author: The reviewer comments are now available that suggest minor revision. I have also read the MS and it is more or less acceptable. But I am unable to accept the authors following response: "The trends of OMA formation efficiency are similar in other experiments conducted with different initial oil concentrations. However, there are only two representatives’ been described. Because putting all data in same figure will make it difficult to read." Authors must show such variation : Shaking time (x-axis) vs E% (y-axis) at various oil concentration (at least four) for the two types [in an additional Fig (a) & in Fig (b)]. A few lines may be added in the relevant portion of the text (R&D Section). The manuscript is still require some revision as described above. 2. On clen.201200236.R2 Comments to the Author: The manuscript can now be acceptable considering the extent of revision made by the Authors. For clarity, minor corrections/changes are however, suggested on the manuscript which is attached. The authors have made a great effort. Thanks to them. 3. On clen.201200236.R3 The paper has been substantially corrected now. However, three minor corrections as noted are to be incorporated. Attached is your submitted revised version with those corrections indicated thereto. Show a sample calculation for the ratio of mineral to dispersed oil as indicated in the relevant portion of the text. Thanks for your great effort. 4. For clen.201200236.R4 The manuscript has not been revised in accordance with the requirements of our Journal and hence it is recommended that the Manuscript be rejected. 都按照要求改了，不知道怎么最后就给了这么个结论！主编貌似也是不看的，每次都是cc给这个Editor: Bandyopadhyay, Amitava 主编回信：I am sorry to inform you that your revised manuscript, "Enhanced Oil-Mineral Aggregation with Modified Bentonite", has not been found acceptable for publication in "CLEAN - Soil, Air, Water". The journal receives many more manuscripts than it can publish and difficult decisions must be made on the basis of an article's perceived priority. Your manuscript did not achieve a high enough ranking to be accepted. While disappointing, I must emphasize that this decision is final. 不知道该如何申诉~~~请大牛给意见。 [ Last edited by lisa1985 on 2012-8-22 at 12:39 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入
已经有4人回复
-
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生
已经有6人回复
-
AI论文写作工具：是科研加速器还是学术作弊器？
已经有3人回复
-
孩子确诊有中度注意力缺陷
已经有6人回复
-
2026博士申请-功能高分子，水凝胶方向
已经有6人回复
-
论文投稿，期刊推荐
已经有4人回复
-
硕士和导师闹得不愉快
已经有13人回复
-
请问2026国家基金面上项目会启动申2停1吗
已经有5人回复
-
同一篇文章，用不同账号投稿对编辑决定是否送审有没有影响？
已经有3人回复
-
RSC ADV状态问题
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
JPS投稿接收了
已经有26人回复- WM with editor 一个月，正常吗？
已经有3人回复
- 投desalination and water treatment，如何知道投稿是否成功？
已经有6人回复
- 圣诞前一天文章莫名其妙被拒稿，申诉成功后今天戏剧接收
已经有231人回复
- 因为语言等细节问题被拒稿，修改后重投给原来的杂志收的可能性大么？
已经有9人回复
- 【Pure water】I am happy that they are very busy.
已经有9人回复
- 请问：修改稿如果不按照审稿人的意见修改，会被拒掉么
已经有14人回复
- 文章接收后修改投稿单位
已经有12人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
坐标武汉，征友
+2/236
-
双面压敏硅胶胶带
+2/98
-
硫化物全固态电池的产业化破局：手套箱如何实现全线稳定制造
+1/91
-
华中科技大学2026级申请考核制博士生1名-新型共轭MOF/COF合成及其超电应用方向
+1/79
-
同济大学 物理科学与工程学院 陈振跃（国家高层次青年人才） 课题组招聘博士后
+1/78
-
Call for papers，征稿
+1/70
-
北京化工大学生命科学与技术学院岗位招聘信息
+1/66
-
上海交通大学智能颗粒流体团队 招收工程AI计算方向科研助理、博士生及博士后
+1/35
-
捷克布拉格查理大学(QS260)招收第一性原理计算方向博士生
+1/34
-
中国科学院深圳先进技术研究院余敏课题组招聘研究助理
+5/30
-
宁波大学张天宇教授课题组招聘副教授/讲师
+1/29
-
浙大城市学院向铮教授与浙江大学联合招聘博后
+1/27
-
南京大学能源与资源学院蔡亮课题组诚招2026年申请-考核制博士生2-3名
+1/10
-
现代材料与先进制造团队硕士生、博士生以及博士毕业生招收公告
+1/9
-
欢迎报考中山大学课题组，提供2025-2026级硕士研究生名额
+1/6
-
诚招博士后及研究人员
+1/6
-
南开大学齐迹课题组诚聘博士后
+1/4
-
湘潭大学化学学院谢鹤楼教授课题组2026年招收有机／高分子方向博士
+1/2
-
北京理工大学珠海校区徐先臣课题组招聘博士后/硕博士
+1/2
-
安捷伦气相色谱处理方法求助
+1/1
6楼2012-09-14 23:16:42
3楼2012-09-14 19:10:10
4楼2012-09-14 22:04:15
5楼2012-09-14 22:20:24