| 查看: 1745 | 回复: 16 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
投tetraheron，审稿人意见如下：大家帮忙参详下 已有7人参与
|
|||
|
有几个问题，为什么现在不打分了？还有就是到底是大修还是小修啊？多谢各位了！ reviewer 1 In the manuscript, Huang et al. reported an convenient synthetic route to 2,7-bromo-4,5-diazafluoren-9-one (3), which can be utilized as a very useful electron-withdrawing building block. Also the absorption and emission properties of a series of D-A molecules based on 4,5-diazafluoren-9-one units was studied, exhibiting solvent-dependent fluorescence and low energy bandgaps. Interestingly, a specific 2D self-assembly behaviors have been also demonstrated. The writing is well-organized. It can be publishable in Tetrahedron. Minor point: In references, the journal name should be properly abbreviated. reviewer 2 The paper of Li and co-workers describes a facile and effective method to synthesize 2,7-dibromo-4,5-diazafluoren-9-one 3 involving tandem oxidation and rearrangement reactions. Compared to the previously reported synthesis route, the reaction condition of new approach is relatively mild and the yield gets improved. Furthermore, 3 D-A compounds were prepared based on compound 3, and their spectroscopic properties and self-assembly was investigated. Thus it is potentially publishable in Tetrahedron as a full article, but certain issues must be addressed through major revision. The following is the list of a few problematic points that need to be corrected in revision: 1- Careful spell check is definitely needed since there are several errors in spelling of organic solvents, such as in Page 3, "toluene", and "dicholoroform". 2- In the discussion of Figure2 page 2, the authors stated "In contrast to compounds 5 and 7, the absorption maximum wavelength of compound 6 was red-shifted approximately 40 nm, presumably because of the improved 3- In the discussion of emission spectra page 3, the authors concluded that the emission spectra of three compounds in solid film are very weak due to the effects of heavy atoms. Here, which kind of heavy atoms do the authors refer? A further discussion is needed before this conclusion. reviewer 3 The study of structure comparison, physical properties, and self-assembly in three D-A molecules provide an interesting insight on structure-function relationship of novel conjugated small molecules. However, the manuscript is full of typos and ambiguous elucidation, which needs to be thoroughly revised by a native English speaker to be understandable. The following points are all shown as highlight in the pdf. 1) The grammatical errors need to be fixed. 2) The large amount of misspelling of words is really not appropriate in a scientific paper. The authors should be more responsible for their writing. 3) What is the reason that the authors use different solvent for reduction and oxidation during CV measurement? 4) Several sentences are not understandable. 5) Among the experimental section, the authors mentioned "appropriate temperature". This is not a description that should appear in a scientific paper. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
336求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
277材料科学与工程080500求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
333求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
286求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
298求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
306求0703调剂一志愿华中师范
已经有5人回复
-
299求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
26考研一志愿中国石油大学(华东)305分求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
初试 317
已经有5人回复
-
296求调剂
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 审稿人的意见，求助大家帮忙一下哈
已经有12人回复
- 两个审稿人意见不同啊~
已经有7人回复
- 大家晒晒分子生物方向的审稿人给的意见！
已经有10人回复
- 被拒后，回复审稿人意见如何投出
已经有9人回复
- 大家帮我看看审稿人的真正意思
已经有10人回复
- 麻烦大家帮忙看下编辑及审稿人的意见 跪谢
已经有4人回复
- IOP大修后重投 审稿人一周返回意见 是悲是喜？
已经有9人回复
- ImechE Power and Energy 第二次大修，请大家帮忙分析一下怎么回复审稿人
已经有10人回复
- 【求助】请求大家帮忙看一下审稿人的回复
已经有6人回复
- 【求助】审稿人意见，不是很懂，大家帮帮忙！
已经有21人回复
- 两个审稿人意见冲突，如何处理呢？
已经有52人回复
- 有一个审稿人的意见，很郁闷，不知道怎么回，大家来帮帮忙啊！
已经有14人回复
- 觉得大家该分享一下审稿人回复的意见
已经有10人回复
- 请教审稿人意见，多谢
已经有3人回复
- 审稿意见回来，一个审稿人让据，编辑说大修，大家帮我看看希望大不
已经有24人回复
- 帮忙看看如何回复审稿人意见，急！！！
已经有5人回复
- 审稿人意见如何回复？
已经有11人回复
zhang2003174
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 444 (硕士)
- 金币: 13183.4
- 散金: 2130
- 红花: 37
- 帖子: 3690
- 在线: 606小时
- 虫号: 1858387
- 注册: 2012-06-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 计算机网络
3楼2012-07-02 20:41:18
，单词，语法写错啥的不应该... 2楼2012-07-02 20:38:08
4楼2012-07-02 20:44:25
5楼2012-07-02 21:11:24
