24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1698  |  回复: 16

水飘零

金虫 (著名写手)

金陵家族之潜水人士

[交流] 投tetraheron,审稿人意见如下:大家帮忙参详下 已有7人参与

有几个问题,为什么现在不打分了?还有就是到底是大修还是小修啊?多谢各位了!

reviewer 1
In the manuscript, Huang et al. reported an convenient synthetic route to 2,7-bromo-4,5-diazafluoren-9-one (3), which can be utilized as a very useful electron-withdrawing building block. Also the absorption and emission properties of a series of D-A molecules based on 4,5-diazafluoren-9-one units was studied, exhibiting solvent-dependent fluorescence and low energy bandgaps. Interestingly, a specific 2D self-assembly behaviors have been also demonstrated. The writing is well-organized. It can be publishable in Tetrahedron. Minor point: In references, the journal name should be properly abbreviated.


reviewer 2
The paper of Li and co-workers describes a facile and effective method to
synthesize 2,7-dibromo-4,5-diazafluoren-9-one 3 involving tandem oxidation and rearrangement reactions. Compared to the previously reported synthesis route, the reaction condition of new approach is relatively mild and the yield gets improved. Furthermore, 3 D-A compounds were prepared based on compound 3, and their spectroscopic properties and self-assembly was investigated. Thus it is potentially publishable in Tetrahedron as a full article, but certain issues must be addressed through major revision. The following is the list of a few problematic points that need to be corrected in revision:
1-    Careful spell check is definitely needed since there are several
errors in spelling of organic solvents, such as in Page 3, "toluene", and
"dicholoroform".
2-    In the discussion of Figure2 page 2, the authors stated "In contrast
to compounds 5 and 7, the absorption maximum wavelength of compound 6 was red-shifted approximately 40 nm, presumably because of the improved -conjugation that resulted from embedding two additional thiophene rings into the donor branches."  However, it is apparently unjustified to compare compounds 6 and 7, since their donor parts are essentially the same. Thus a significant revision is needed here.
3-    In the discussion of emission spectra page 3, the authors concluded
that the emission spectra of three compounds in solid film are very weak due to the effects of heavy atoms. Here, which kind of heavy atoms do the authors refer? A further discussion is needed before this conclusion.

reviewer 3
The study of structure comparison, physical properties, and self-assembly in three D-A molecules provide an interesting insight on structure-function relationship of novel conjugated small molecules. However, the manuscript is full of typos and ambiguous elucidation, which needs to be thoroughly revised by a native English speaker to be understandable. The following points are all shown as highlight in the pdf.
1)   The grammatical errors need to be fixed.
2)   The large amount of misspelling of words is really not appropriate
in a scientific paper. The authors should be more responsible for their
writing.
3)   What is the reason that the authors use different solvent for
reduction and oxidation during CV measurement?
4)   Several sentences are not understandable.
5)   Among the experimental section, the authors mentioned "appropriate temperature". This is not a description that should appear in a scientific paper.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

花自飘零水自流,一种相思,两处闲愁;此情无计可消除,才下眉头,却上心头
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

leiws

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

木虫浪子


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
三人普遍反映楼主写作需要雕琢,单词,语法写错啥的不应该...
人的烦恼就是记性太好,如果可以把所有事都忘掉,以后每一日都是个新开始,你说多好。
2楼2012-07-02 20:38:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhang2003174

至尊木虫 (职业作家)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
呵呵,感觉上是两个小修录用,一个大修,应该是没有问题了,恭喜楼主了。
3楼2012-07-02 20:41:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ldbz

新虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
审稿人的意见说的很清楚了。有哪里不明白的吗
4楼2012-07-02 20:44:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

水飘零

金虫 (著名写手)

金陵家族之潜水人士

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by ldbz at 2012-07-02 20:44:25
审稿人的意见说的很清楚了。有哪里不明白的吗

就是说3个审稿人都说语法有误,文章不要补充数据和调整结构,是吗?主要是最后一个审稿人要我彻底修改文章写作?
花自飘零水自流,一种相思,两处闲愁;此情无计可消除,才下眉头,却上心头
5楼2012-07-02 21:11:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

水飘零

金虫 (著名写手)

金陵家族之潜水人士

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by leiws at 2012-07-02 20:38:08
三人普遍反映楼主写作需要雕琢,单词,语法写错啥的不应该...

我自己检查都快吐了,真尽力了
花自飘零水自流,一种相思,两处闲愁;此情无计可消除,才下眉头,却上心头
6楼2012-07-02 21:11:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

leiws

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

木虫浪子


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by 水飘零 at 2012-07-02 21:11:57
我自己检查都快吐了,真尽力了...

现在多受磨砺是好事,过了这坎,第二篇就顺利得多了
人的烦恼就是记性太好,如果可以把所有事都忘掉,以后每一日都是个新开始,你说多好。
7楼2012-07-02 21:14:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

henry835

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
管他大修小修,找审稿人的意见修改就是了。
Reviewer
8楼2012-07-02 21:24:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ldbz

新虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by 水飘零 at 2012-07-02 21:11:24
就是说3个审稿人都说语法有误,文章不要补充数据和调整结构,是吗?主要是最后一个审稿人要我彻底修改文章写作?...

写作是一方面。
另外你的论文里有一些讨论不太合理,审稿人比较在意这个,得好好改改。包括第2个人说的那两点和第三个人说的full of ambiguous elucidation
9楼2012-07-02 21:26:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

水飘零

金虫 (著名写手)

金陵家族之潜水人士

引用回帖:
9楼: Originally posted by ldbz at 2012-07-02 21:26:20
写作是一方面。
另外你的论文里有一些讨论不太合理,审稿人比较在意这个,得好好改改。包括第2个人说的那两点和第三个人说的full of ambiguous elucidation...

第二个人的问题好回答啊,那是常识,但第三个人说整个讨论充满模糊的描述,这不好改啊,目标不明确……请大神指导
花自飘零水自流,一种相思,两处闲愁;此情无计可消除,才下眉头,却上心头
10楼2012-07-02 21:41:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 水飘零 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见