24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1962  |  回复: 16

水飘零

金虫 (著名写手)

金陵家族之潜水人士

[交流] 投tetraheron,审稿人意见如下:大家帮忙参详下 已有7人参与

有几个问题,为什么现在不打分了?还有就是到底是大修还是小修啊?多谢各位了!

reviewer 1
In the manuscript, Huang et al. reported an convenient synthetic route to 2,7-bromo-4,5-diazafluoren-9-one (3), which can be utilized as a very useful electron-withdrawing building block. Also the absorption and emission properties of a series of D-A molecules based on 4,5-diazafluoren-9-one units was studied, exhibiting solvent-dependent fluorescence and low energy bandgaps. Interestingly, a specific 2D self-assembly behaviors have been also demonstrated. The writing is well-organized. It can be publishable in Tetrahedron. Minor point: In references, the journal name should be properly abbreviated.


reviewer 2
The paper of Li and co-workers describes a facile and effective method to
synthesize 2,7-dibromo-4,5-diazafluoren-9-one 3 involving tandem oxidation and rearrangement reactions. Compared to the previously reported synthesis route, the reaction condition of new approach is relatively mild and the yield gets improved. Furthermore, 3 D-A compounds were prepared based on compound 3, and their spectroscopic properties and self-assembly was investigated. Thus it is potentially publishable in Tetrahedron as a full article, but certain issues must be addressed through major revision. The following is the list of a few problematic points that need to be corrected in revision:
1-    Careful spell check is definitely needed since there are several
errors in spelling of organic solvents, such as in Page 3, "toluene", and
"dicholoroform".
2-    In the discussion of Figure2 page 2, the authors stated "In contrast
to compounds 5 and 7, the absorption maximum wavelength of compound 6 was red-shifted approximately 40 nm, presumably because of the improved -conjugation that resulted from embedding two additional thiophene rings into the donor branches."  However, it is apparently unjustified to compare compounds 6 and 7, since their donor parts are essentially the same. Thus a significant revision is needed here.
3-    In the discussion of emission spectra page 3, the authors concluded
that the emission spectra of three compounds in solid film are very weak due to the effects of heavy atoms. Here, which kind of heavy atoms do the authors refer? A further discussion is needed before this conclusion.

reviewer 3
The study of structure comparison, physical properties, and self-assembly in three D-A molecules provide an interesting insight on structure-function relationship of novel conjugated small molecules. However, the manuscript is full of typos and ambiguous elucidation, which needs to be thoroughly revised by a native English speaker to be understandable. The following points are all shown as highlight in the pdf.
1)   The grammatical errors need to be fixed.
2)   The large amount of misspelling of words is really not appropriate
in a scientific paper. The authors should be more responsible for their
writing.
3)   What is the reason that the authors use different solvent for
reduction and oxidation during CV measurement?
4)   Several sentences are not understandable.
5)   Among the experimental section, the authors mentioned "appropriate temperature". This is not a description that should appear in a scientific paper.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

花自飘零水自流,一种相思,两处闲愁;此情无计可消除,才下眉头,却上心头
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

leiws

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

木虫浪子


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
三人普遍反映楼主写作需要雕琢,单词,语法写错啥的不应该...
人的烦恼就是记性太好,如果可以把所有事都忘掉,以后每一日都是个新开始,你说多好。
2楼2012-07-02 20:38:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhang2003174

至尊木虫 (职业作家)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
呵呵,感觉上是两个小修录用,一个大修,应该是没有问题了,恭喜楼主了。
3楼2012-07-02 20:41:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ldbz

新虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
审稿人的意见说的很清楚了。有哪里不明白的吗
4楼2012-07-02 20:44:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

水飘零

金虫 (著名写手)

金陵家族之潜水人士

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by ldbz at 2012-07-02 20:44:25
审稿人的意见说的很清楚了。有哪里不明白的吗

就是说3个审稿人都说语法有误,文章不要补充数据和调整结构,是吗?主要是最后一个审稿人要我彻底修改文章写作?
花自飘零水自流,一种相思,两处闲愁;此情无计可消除,才下眉头,却上心头
5楼2012-07-02 21:11:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

水飘零

金虫 (著名写手)

金陵家族之潜水人士

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by leiws at 2012-07-02 20:38:08
三人普遍反映楼主写作需要雕琢,单词,语法写错啥的不应该...

我自己检查都快吐了,真尽力了
花自飘零水自流,一种相思,两处闲愁;此情无计可消除,才下眉头,却上心头
6楼2012-07-02 21:11:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

leiws

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

木虫浪子


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by 水飘零 at 2012-07-02 21:11:57
我自己检查都快吐了,真尽力了...

现在多受磨砺是好事,过了这坎,第二篇就顺利得多了
人的烦恼就是记性太好,如果可以把所有事都忘掉,以后每一日都是个新开始,你说多好。
7楼2012-07-02 21:14:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

henry835

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
管他大修小修,找审稿人的意见修改就是了。
Reviewer
8楼2012-07-02 21:24:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ldbz

新虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by 水飘零 at 2012-07-02 21:11:24
就是说3个审稿人都说语法有误,文章不要补充数据和调整结构,是吗?主要是最后一个审稿人要我彻底修改文章写作?...

写作是一方面。
另外你的论文里有一些讨论不太合理,审稿人比较在意这个,得好好改改。包括第2个人说的那两点和第三个人说的full of ambiguous elucidation
9楼2012-07-02 21:26:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

水飘零

金虫 (著名写手)

金陵家族之潜水人士

引用回帖:
9楼: Originally posted by ldbz at 2012-07-02 21:26:20
写作是一方面。
另外你的论文里有一些讨论不太合理,审稿人比较在意这个,得好好改改。包括第2个人说的那两点和第三个人说的full of ambiguous elucidation...

第二个人的问题好回答啊,那是常识,但第三个人说整个讨论充满模糊的描述,这不好改啊,目标不明确……请大神指导
花自飘零水自流,一种相思,两处闲愁;此情无计可消除,才下眉头,却上心头
10楼2012-07-02 21:41:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 水飘零 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +3 G6APbkg8SA6w 2026-08-29 3/150 2026-08-29 18:59 by 4FFAWE8HcgUD
[基金申请] 国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论 (金币+15) +15 晴天加油 2026-08-26 16/800 2026-08-29 18:28 by symmetry
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急 +3 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-08-29 18:15 by 4FFAWE8HcgUD
[公派出国] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +4 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 6/300 2026-08-29 17:30 by 4FFAWE8HcgUD
[考博] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急 +5 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 8/400 2026-08-29 17:22 by 4FFAWE8HcgUD
[教师之家] 导师吐槽:我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生! +9 苏东坡二世 2026-08-23 9/450 2026-08-29 14:41 by hustersqt
[找工作] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +4 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 6/300 2026-08-29 11:29 by jCd0dEvKHShX
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难 +12 Kittylucky 2026-08-27 13/650 2026-08-29 00:04 by superceng
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +11 eulota 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-28 14:22 by 火星超人xi
[基金申请] 哪位高人中了,把查询到的截图贴出来让我看看,让我长长见识 +5 yuleib84 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-28 00:02 by yudaoqian88
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +5 ssyjh 2026-08-27 5/250 2026-08-27 20:50 by gdfollow
[基金申请] 申请删除本帖 +6 lyz123lyz 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-27 17:31 by 宁静致远sy
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[基金申请] 国际合作可查了,中了面上 (EPI+1)(金币+50) +18 Ldrop2023 2026-08-26 18/900 2026-08-26 11:15 by cmrandy
[基金申请] 项目信息和经费信息在系统里都可以看到了 +6 wittyboy 2026-08-26 14/700 2026-08-26 10:55 by wittyboy
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[基金申请] 牛来!米来!面来! +8 beefly 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-08-26 08:37 by xuzhipiao
[基金申请] 明天应该可查了!? +6 chengyan1220 2026-08-23 6/300 2026-08-25 19:45 by zfd97
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
信息提示
请填处理意见