24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 1676  |  回复: 4

shigang01

银虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 麻烦大家帮忙看下编辑及审稿人的意见 跪谢

Dear ××××

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.  

For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.

Sample Text Requirements can be found in the Guide for Authors, which is accessible from the journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/physb.  A list of frequently needed corrections is given below.


Authors are kindly requested to submit a revised version within three months or to inform the editor if more time is necessary.

To submit a revision, please go to http://ees.elsevier.com/physb/ and login as an Author.
Your username is:****

For security reasons your password is not given in this e-mail. To retrieve it please click the "send password" link on the login page.

On your Main Menu page is a folder entitled "Submissions Needing Revision". You will find your submission record there.


Yours sincerely,

Hirofumi Wada
Editor
Physica B

Reviewers' comments:


Reviewer #1: 28 January 2012
Physica B: Condensed Matter
Dear Editor Hirofumi Wada,

The work "××××××" is well structured, presents experimental scientific data, which is of interest.  The combined influence of Two-Step Sintering (TSS) process and addition of ××××× on the microstructure and magnetic properties of NiZn ferrite was investigated. The results showed that TSS method with suitable additive brought positive improvement of the microstructure and magnetic properties of NiZn ferrite.
The work satisfies the conditions for publishing, yet not before the authors bring some improvements and corrections, as specified below:

1. In Chapter 2 I recommend you give and the wavelength used for XRD.
2. Some sentences should be revised (to specify clearly the notion of time or temperature)
"When the TSS methods were used, the densities increased rapidly, higher density could obtain with the longer sintering time of T1."
            "When the dwelling time at T1 held for 30 min, the shrinkage remained almost unaltered."   etc.
3. The grammar of the work needs to be revised here and there, possibly some typing errors too.
In Chapter 3.1 I recommend (Fig. 3 a and e) not (a and e in Fig. 3), etc.


Best Regards,
Dr. Corneliu Doroftei





-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please ensure that your manuscript is in accordance with the following technical requirements:
1) The level of English should meet the journal's standard.  Please check for grammatical and spelling errors, and poorly constructed sentences, and refine the language carefully.
2) A maximum of 6 keywords should be provided.
3) All figures and tables should be captioned, labelled, and cited within the text sequentially.  All figures should be clearly readable and of high quality.  
4) All references provided in the reference list should be cited in the text, sequentially. The references should be given as 1, 2, 3 and so on.  
5) The corresponding author should be identified with an asterisk and the complete postal address, tel/fax numbers with area and country code and e-mail address should be provided on the first page of the manuscript.
6) The text layout should be in single column format and with double line spacing.
7) Pages should be numbered.
8) Section and subsections should be numbered 1.1 (1.1.1, 1.1.2, ..), 1.2, .

没给意见是大修还是小修 编辑特意提到的  technical problems 是不是指图表 以及 拼写方面的问题?第二个审稿人只提出 technical problems 是否意味着实验内容上没太大问题? 大家帮忙看下希望大不?被拒N次了  心中忐忑。。。。。。
      另外审稿人没有提到 但我自己却发现的几个问题修改后是否要回复审稿人或者编辑?
     谢谢大家了
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

努力 努力!
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hughflyer

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
算是小修,第一个审稿人没有打的问题,按照要求一条一条的去改就好了,第二个是technical problems ,也是按照他提得认真去修改就好了,祝好运!
2楼2012-02-03 00:52:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

keqi8058

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
都是小问题,一条条改过去就行了。特别是第二个审稿人,发现了如此多的Technical problems,可见你投论文的时候是多么漫不经心了。同样第一个审稿人也提出了你存在很多语法甚至拼写的错误。。。加油吧,楼主!
3楼2012-02-03 01:47:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

tianjinzxl

木虫 (著名写手)

小学生

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
不错的修改意见了,认真修改后中的概率很大的,搂主加油吧
If it's nor trying, you are not trying hard enough!
4楼2012-02-03 08:29:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

luqingq

银虫 (初入文坛)

想问LZ这片文章最后的结果怎么样了?修改后中了吗?修改后多长时间接收的?急等!!!!!!!!!!
再补充一个问题,第二个审稿的意见你是怎么修的呢?本人接收到一样的意见
5楼2013-03-09 14:05:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 shigang01 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见