24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

xzzhu7471

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1775.9
散金: 124
红花: 1
帖子: 315
在线: 520.8小时
虫号: 539586
注册: 2008-04-04
专业: 机械动力学

[求助] 5个审稿人，大修，修改说明一共30页，如何提交修改说明？

5个审稿人，大修，修改说明一共30页，请问提交修改稿时，是提交5个审稿意见放一起的修改说明；还是分别提交5份修改说明（用5个文件）？

这个杂志是小期刊：香港的《Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics. 》

谢谢！

回复此楼

1楼 2012-04-18 06:29:07

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

回帖置顶 ( 共有1个 )

jingyanwang

木虫 (正式写手)

王靖琰，我爱读PAMI

应助: 26 (小学生)
金币: 2909.1
散金: 300
红花: 6
帖子: 451
在线: 180.2小时
虫号: 971124
注册: 2010-03-14
性别: GG
专业: 模式识别

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
avast2009: 金币+2, 例子举得很好 2012-04-19 08:56:32
avast2009: 回帖置顶 2012-04-19 14:47:23
xzzhu7471: 金币+1, ★★★很有帮助 2012-05-06 13:10:47

一个文件中：
Response to Review #1
..........
Response to Review #2
..........
....
Response to Review #5
..........

赞一下(1人)

回复此楼

http://blog.sciencenet.cn/u/jingyanwang

26楼2012-04-18 22:36:52

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

专家经验: +14
SEPI: 1
应助: 14603 (教授)
贵宾: 11.659
金币: 345462
散金: 9262
红花: 1423
沙发: 2016
帖子: 127553
在线: 8880.4小时
虫号: 971012
注册: 2010-03-14
专业: 环境工程
管辖: 论文投稿

【答案】应助回帖

★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
xzzhu7471: 金币+1, ★★★很有帮助 2012-05-06 13:10:56

通用的格式应该是审稿意见和回复都在一个文件里，逐条列出每个审稿人的意见并回复，类似于这样的格式：
Dear Editor and Reviewers:
Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:
Responds to the reviewer’s comments:
Reviewer #1:
1. Response to comment: (……列出审稿意见……)
Response: ××××××
2. Response to comment: (……列出审稿意见……)
Response: ××××××
。。。。。。
Reviewer #2:
同上
。。。。。。
Reviewer #5:
同上
Other changes:
1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………”
2. Line 107, “……” was added
3. Line 129, “……” was deleted
××××××
We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.
We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.
Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

赞一下(11人)

回复此楼

咱也是有组织的人了...

16楼2012-04-18 17:23:03

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖