24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

xzzhu7471

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1775.9
散金: 124
红花: 1
帖子: 315
在线: 520.8小时
虫号: 539586
注册: 2008-04-04
专业: 机械动力学

[求助] 5个审稿人，大修，修改说明一共30页，如何提交修改说明？

5个审稿人，大修，修改说明一共30页，请问提交修改稿时，是提交5个审稿意见放一起的修改说明；还是分别提交5份修改说明（用5个文件）？

这个杂志是小期刊：香港的《Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics. 》

谢谢！

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

青椒八年已不青，大家都被折磨成啥样了？已经有11人回复
限项规定已经有9人回复
免疫学博士有名额，速联系已经有4人回复
交叉科学部支持青年基金，对三无青椒是个机会吗？已经有5人回复
国家基金申请书模板内插入图片不可调整大小? 已经有6人回复
国家级人才课题组招收2026年入学博士已经有5人回复
Fe3O4@SiO2合成已经有6人回复
青年基金C终止已经有4人回复
26申博求博导推荐-遥感图像处理方向已经有4人回复
西南交通大学国家级人才团队2026年博士研究生招生（考核制）—机械、材料、力学方向已经有3人回复

1楼 2012-04-18 06:29:07

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

专家经验: +14
SEPI: 1
应助: 14603 (教授)
贵宾: 11.659
金币: 345462
散金: 9262
红花: 1423
沙发: 2016
帖子: 127553
在线: 8880.4小时
虫号: 971012
注册: 2010-03-14
专业: 环境工程
管辖: 论文投稿

【答案】应助回帖

★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
xzzhu7471: 金币+1, ★★★很有帮助 2012-05-06 13:10:56

通用的格式应该是审稿意见和回复都在一个文件里，逐条列出每个审稿人的意见并回复，类似于这样的格式：
Dear Editor and Reviewers:
Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:
Responds to the reviewer’s comments:
Reviewer #1:
1. Response to comment: (……列出审稿意见……)
Response: ××××××
2. Response to comment: (……列出审稿意见……)
Response: ××××××
。。。。。。
Reviewer #2:
同上
。。。。。。
Reviewer #5:
同上
Other changes:
1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………”
2. Line 107, “……” was added
3. Line 129, “……” was deleted
××××××
We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.
We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.
Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.