| 查看: 1996 | 回复: 7 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
qhd511铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
我的投稿外审意见，只有1个人的意见，麻烦专家帮忙分析一下，谢谢 已有6人参与
|
||
|
Reviewers' comments: H techniques by A and F are well established for B determination. HA is routinely used for various environmental matrices. There is insufficient novelty in this MS. N-C digestion in open vessel is well established; HF is known as a more sensitive alternative (not replacement) of HA. It is known that M can be useful in optimization of experimental conditions. There is some novelty in demonstrating differences between S and U optimization. Positives: good experimental work; relevant LOD and precision; practical application to a few real samples and to 2 CRMs. Negatives: 1) Inadequate novelty. Proposed procedure is working properly but cannot repace HA as stated. 2) Irrelevant bibliography with too many references devoted to other matrices. Author should discuss problems in E and U analysis rather than general Introduction on 3 pages as presented. In many references are missing family names given by initials, say in Ref. 9, 21, 25, 30, 32. 3) Digestion involving C is rather impractical, time consuming and hazardous for routine work. Complete decomposition is claimed by silica residues would not be brought in solution anyway. Potential advantages versus R digestion are not clearly demonstrated. 4) Applications to a limited number of CRMs, only one W and one S CRM, is given. Only 4 W and 2 S samples are analyzed. 5) T is toxic reagent; there are other alternatives as prereductants. 6) Last sentence in conclusions is confusing; why is speciation analysis mentioned? Speciation problems and other A species are not addressed and discussed in this MS. 7) Fig. 4 is not informative and could be explained in text. 8) Table 1: r min-1 is usually given as rpm? Table 2: four to six significant figures are too many? 9) What is new versus preceeding paper Ref. 29? I recommend that this work be rejected for publication. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
找导师
已经有4人回复
-
我就是申请一个面上项目而已，这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧？
已经有11人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有18人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 审稿人二审意见帮我分析一下！多谢各位大牛
已经有5人回复
- 麻烦大家帮忙看下编辑及审稿人的意见 跪谢
已经有4人回复
- 求高人帮忙分析下APL审稿意见
已经有7人回复
- SCI审稿意见回来了，编辑给的moderate revision，麻烦大家帮分析一下，有BB
已经有28人回复
- 11月1日下午刚送外审，11月2日傍晚显示已有一个审稿意见回来了，说明什么，被拒绝了？
已经有25人回复
- 请大家帮忙分析下这句审稿意见是什么意思
已经有4人回复
- 请大家帮忙分析一下soft matter审稿人给的意见
已经有20人回复
- 审稿意见回来了，看不懂是什么意思，请那位大侠帮忙翻译一下？谢谢！
已经有4人回复
- 麻烦高人指点一下,审稿意见中这一句是什么意思,谢谢.
已经有3人回复
- 电子与信息学报的一个外审意见,大家帮忙看看+第二个外审意见已回
已经有33人回复
- 文章被拒了，麻烦各位高手进来帮忙分析下拒绝意见。谢谢
已经有12人回复
- 《信息与控制》一个外审专家一周就提交了审稿意见
已经有19人回复
- synthetic metals 投稿，审稿意见， 请各位帮忙分析一下！
已经有6人回复
- 大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？
已经有24人回复
- 看不到《化工学报》外审专家意见，急
已经有13人回复
8楼2012-04-18 19:15:05
super_nan
木虫 (正式写手)
老衲心有所属
- 应助: 10 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1364.4
- 散金: 891
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 966
- 在线: 372.6小时
- 虫号: 507433
- 注册: 2008-02-19
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 数论
2楼2011-12-30 14:59:04
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
3楼2011-12-30 15:11:58
qhd511
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 324 (大学生)
- 金币: 6915.3
- 散金: 226
- 红花: 12
- 帖子: 1922
- 在线: 390.1小时
- 虫号: 1079710
- 注册: 2010-08-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境分析化学
4楼2011-12-30 15:23:49
投票:
