24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1994  |  回复: 7

qhd511

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] 我的投稿外审意见,只有1个人的意见,麻烦专家帮忙分析一下,谢谢 已有6人参与

Reviewers' comments:
H  techniques by A and F are well established for B determination. HA is routinely used for various environmental matrices. There is insufficient novelty in this MS.
N-C digestion in open vessel is well established; HF is known as a more sensitive alternative (not replacement) of HA. It is known that M can be useful in optimization of experimental conditions.  
There is some novelty in demonstrating differences between S and U optimization.
Positives: good experimental work; relevant LOD and precision; practical application to a few real samples and to 2 CRMs.
Negatives:
1) Inadequate novelty. Proposed procedure is working properly but cannot repace HA as stated.
2) Irrelevant bibliography with too many references devoted to other matrices. Author should discuss problems in E and U analysis rather than general Introduction on 3 pages as presented. In many references are missing family names given by initials, say in Ref. 9, 21, 25, 30, 32.
3) Digestion involving C is rather impractical, time consuming and hazardous for routine work. Complete decomposition is claimed by silica residues would not be brought in solution anyway. Potential advantages versus R digestion are not clearly demonstrated.
4) Applications to a limited number of CRMs, only one W and one S CRM, is given. Only 4 W and 2 S samples are analyzed.
5) T is toxic reagent; there are other alternatives as prereductants.
6) Last sentence in conclusions is confusing; why is speciation analysis mentioned? Speciation problems and other A species are not addressed and discussed in this MS.
7) Fig. 4 is not informative and could be explained in text.
8) Table 1: r min-1 is usually given as rpm? Table 2: four to six significant figures are too many?
9) What is new versus preceeding paper Ref. 29?

I recommend that this work be rejected for publication.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

super_nan

木虫 (正式写手)

老衲心有所属


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
最后一句 可能 只回来了一个 意见 副主编 认为没有必要等别人的意见了 也就是说 副主编和这个人一样的意见 reject
人生若只如初见,何事秋风悲画扇
2楼2011-12-30 14:59:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
是拒稿了吗?如果主编给大修,那还有机会,只是要小心回复审稿人
3楼2011-12-30 15:11:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

qhd511

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

是拒稿,这个杂志只有1个审稿人的意见。
4楼2011-12-30 15:23:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

longway102

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

呃,拒稿了,虽然审稿意见很丰富,
5楼2011-12-30 17:57:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

leongoall

专家顾问 (知名作家)

P-M-I之初生牛犊

拒稿还能给这么多意见算不错了,只能这么想了!

照着意见改吧,改完了换个杂志投!
趁年轻,多折腾!曾年轻,折腾过?!
6楼2011-12-30 18:53:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangjunpeng

至尊木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖
照着修改意见改吧,这个审稿人的修改意见已经非常的详细了,修改好了,可以改投好一点的杂志。
北冥有鱼,其名为鲲。鲲之大,不知其几千里也。化而为鸟,其名为鹏。鹏之背,不知其几千里也。怒而飞,其翼若垂天之云。是鸟也,海运则将徙于南冥。南冥者,...
7楼2011-12-30 20:36:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Nocturne

木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
据了,改投吧
祝LZ好运
8楼2012-04-18 19:15:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 qhd511 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考博] 售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 07:05 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[找工作] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急 +3 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 06:43 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[教师之家] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急 +5 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-30 06:10 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急 +6 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 13/650 2026-08-30 05:38 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[考博] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 G6APbkg8SA6w 2026-08-29 3/150 2026-08-30 02:22 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[公派出国] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +4 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-08-30 01:45 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[公派出国] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急 +4 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 01:36 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[考博] 售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-08-30 01:34 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[论文投稿] 售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急 +4 gy1nBQXYQJqL 2026-08-29 6/300 2026-08-30 01:25 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[博后之家] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +7 ASdOkHsho7FD 2026-08-28 8/400 2026-08-30 01:14 by ZPa0EcMwuECS
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +8 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 16/800 2026-08-29 20:45 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 9/450 2026-08-29 09:59 by jklily
[基金申请] 怎么查啊 +6 huang1991js 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-28 08:42 by winsaint
[基金申请] 申请删除本帖 +6 lyz123lyz 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-27 17:31 by 宁静致远sy
[基金申请] 怎么看青基中了没有啊 +5 叶九微 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-27 10:35 by l_zh2008
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +3 myrtle 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-27 10:01 by angelyueyi
[基金申请] 我不理解! +15 Edward_pc 2026-08-26 23/1150 2026-08-26 20:34 by zzuzxg
[基金申请] 2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战 +7 process2012 2026-08-23 10/500 2026-08-26 19:23 by hmhminy
[基金申请] 2026年8月25日国自然放榜前突然收到列入评审专家邮件,有关系吗? +25 木水思豆 2026-08-25 28/1400 2026-08-26 14:53 by draco1987
[基金申请] 没有任何消息-是不是就凉了 +9 图啦图啦 2026-08-24 10/500 2026-08-25 11:59 by 南海小哥
信息提示
请填处理意见