| 查看: 579 | 回复: 1 | |||
[交流]
【求助完毕】NEB过渡态计算neb.dat中force的正负是什么意思？
|
|
这是我在官网论坛上提的问题（http://theory.cm.utexas.edu/foru ... 27&p=2933#p2933），请教！ I have got a neb.dat read like below: 0 0.000000 0.000000 -0.010838 0 1 0.867271 -0.837088 -1.279897 1 2 1.768503 -1.026423 -1.128849 2 3 2.584773 -0.937171 -2.621561 3 4 3.429818 -0.846114 -0.975741 4 5 4.433803 -1.987181 -2.796546 5 6 5.509804 -2.035966 -3.951533 6 7 6.561177 -2.989551 0.890184 7 8 7.546694 -2.312575 -0.077526 8 (1)What does a positive or a negative force item mean in the fourth column? Do the plus or minus sign directs the movement of the images? (2)The distance between two nearby images is supposed to be lower than 1 Angstrom? (3)Can anyone give me some advice about the 7th line with the lowest energy? The 8th line has been relaxed to ground state and is supposed to be CO-adsorbed-slab Final State. And the first line stands for configuration that CO in the vacuum off the slab surface. [ Last edited by cenwanglai on 2011-3-19 at 15:27 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
材料调剂
已经有4人回复
-
面上模板改不了页边距吧？
已经有6人回复
-
307求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
304求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
317一志愿华南理工电气工程求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
272求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
化工专硕348，一志愿985求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
292求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
290求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
295求调剂
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 金属锌五配位的，如何通过计算判断其为三角双锥还是四方锥
已经有9人回复
- 请问光子态密度（photonic mode density）的确切物理含义为何？
已经有5人回复
- NEB计算扩散路径的力收敛精度设置问题
已经有16人回复
- vasp计算neb忽然停掉了！如果想继续算我应该怎么办呐？
已经有8人回复
- NEB计算过渡态和反应路径
已经有9人回复
- 计算neb出错，请高手帮忙看看
已经有27人回复
- 新手请教用NEB方法计算energy barrier.
已经有15人回复
- vasp用neb计算迁移势垒
已经有11人回复
- 【文献学习】JACS上一篇纯DFT计算的文献： CI-NEB计算，Leuwdin布局分析，态密度分析
已经有30人回复
- 【求助】NEB算过渡态出现致命错误
已经有5人回复
- 【其他】vasp neb 计算讨论
已经有20人回复
- 【求助成功】怎么样提高NEB计算速度?
已经有19人回复
- 【讨论】NEB寻找过渡态专题讨论
已经有49人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
求助哪里可以做光催化产氢的放大实验
+1/83
-
化生学院蒋老师课题组招收研究生
+1/82
-
东北石油大学三亚海洋油气研究院【硕士招生】【地质资源与地质工程】【地质学】
+1/79
-
招中药学和药学专业研究生
+1/40
-
西安交通大学杜宝吉课题组招收2026统考硕士生
+1/30
-
南京林业大学化工院勇强/赖晨欢教授团队招收申请考核制博士1名
+1/26
-
算法实习生招聘（驻地郑州，可提供实习证明、转正机会）
+1/20
-
电子科技大学材料学院SFT创新中心招收2026年博士生及科研助理
+1/13
-
各位大佬，面上项目预算多少合适？预算有用吗？
+1/13
-
【少数民族】【生物医药】2026青岛大学招博士生
+1/10
-
坐标南京，高校老师，诚征女友
+1/9
-
深圳大学何传新课题组诚聘博士后、（副）研究员
+1/9
-
长江大学农学院硕士生招生
+1/9
-
中国科学院宁波材料所 极端环境高分子工程材料团队 诚聘博士后
+1/8
-
青岛大学功能纺织品与先进材料研究院招收2026级申请考核制博士
+1/7
-
中科院深圳先进技术研究院成会明院士/唐永炳杰青团队拟招聘博士后若干名。
+1/4
-
招调剂
+1/4
-
26届计算机、电子信息类、电科、控制、通信考研T j信息pp骏：74+08+76+6+20？
+1/4
-
寻找合适博导
+1/2
-
青岛科技大学高分子学院--让我们一起做有趣的研究
+1/1
★ ★
zzy870720z(金币+2): 谢谢总结 2011-03-19 16:42:51
zzy870720z(金币+2): 谢谢总结 2011-03-19 16:42:51
|
I got a response from graeme: It is a little tricky to see what's going on from a list of numbers, but here's a guess. There does not appear to be a barrier for adsorption on the surface since the energy decreases from image 0->2. We typically use the NEB to find pathways between stable states. There may be a local minimum near image #2, but there is certainly a more stable adsorption geometry near image #7 which should be minimized. Then, consider what you are trying to calculate. If there is no barrier for adsorption, this band may only tell you that the energy drops as you go from CO in vacuum to CO on the surface. If that is the case, there is no need for finding a minimum energy pathway. Column 4 is the force projected along the band. A negative force means that the energy is going down along the band and a positive force means that it is going up. The distance between images can be smaller than 1 Ang. If you used twice the number of images to represent the same band, the distance between images will decrease by a factor of two. In the limit of many images, that distance between images can be arbitrarily small. There are no interatomic interactions between images along the band. [ Last edited by cenwanglai on 2011-3-19 at 15:32 ] |
2楼2011-03-19 15:29:54
