| 查看: 569 | 回复: 1 | |||
[交流]
【求助完毕】NEB过渡态计算neb.dat中force的正负是什么意思?
|
|
这是我在官网论坛上提的问题(http://theory.cm.utexas.edu/foru ... 27&p=2933#p2933),请教! I have got a neb.dat read like below: 0 0.000000 0.000000 -0.010838 0 1 0.867271 -0.837088 -1.279897 1 2 1.768503 -1.026423 -1.128849 2 3 2.584773 -0.937171 -2.621561 3 4 3.429818 -0.846114 -0.975741 4 5 4.433803 -1.987181 -2.796546 5 6 5.509804 -2.035966 -3.951533 6 7 6.561177 -2.989551 0.890184 7 8 7.546694 -2.312575 -0.077526 8 (1)What does a positive or a negative force item mean in the fourth column? Do the plus or minus sign directs the movement of the images? (2)The distance between two nearby images is supposed to be lower than 1 Angstrom? (3)Can anyone give me some advice about the 7th line with the lowest energy? The 8th line has been relaxed to ground state and is supposed to be CO-adsorbed-slab Final State. And the first line stands for configuration that CO in the vacuum off the slab surface. [ Last edited by cenwanglai on 2011-3-19 at 15:27 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
参与限项
已经有3人回复
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有7人回复
实验室接单子
已经有4人回复
全日制(定向)博士
已经有4人回复
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
求助:我三月中下旬出站,青基依托单位怎么办?
已经有12人回复
不自信的我
已经有12人回复
所感
已经有4人回复
要不要辞职读博?
已经有7人回复
北核录用
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
金属锌五配位的,如何通过计算判断其为三角双锥还是四方锥
已经有9人回复
请问光子态密度(photonic mode density)的确切物理含义为何?
已经有5人回复
NEB计算扩散路径的力收敛精度设置问题
已经有16人回复
vasp计算neb忽然停掉了!如果想继续算我应该怎么办呐?
已经有8人回复
NEB计算过渡态和反应路径
已经有9人回复
计算neb出错,请高手帮忙看看
已经有27人回复
新手请教用NEB方法计算energy barrier.
已经有15人回复
vasp用neb计算迁移势垒
已经有11人回复
【文献学习】JACS上一篇纯DFT计算的文献: CI-NEB计算,Leuwdin布局分析,态密度分析
已经有30人回复
【求助】NEB算过渡态出现致命错误
已经有5人回复
【其他】vasp neb 计算讨论
已经有20人回复
【求助成功】怎么样提高NEB计算速度?
已经有19人回复
【讨论】NEB寻找过渡态专题讨论
已经有49人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
中国科学院大学功能多孔组装材料实验室招聘启事
+2/314
原子层沉积(ALD)磁控溅射PECVD等微纳代工服务:18817872921
+1/83
上海科技大学物质科学与技术学院|王平鸾课题组长期招聘(博后/博硕/科研助理)
+1/76
湖南师范大学医工交叉科研团队招收计算机博士生
+1/75
深圳大学材料学院黄妍斐教授课题组诚招2026年秋季入学博士生
+1/75
留学导师避雷——望传播
+1/58
真诚找对象
+1/58
江西理工大学 稀土学院(发光材料与器件研究所) 招收2026届 材料类博士研究生 2名
+2/54
英国布里斯托大学诚招博士生和联合培养生 (近期多个博士奖学金)
+1/30
SCI,计算机相关可以写
+1/20
SCI,计算机相关可以写
+1/18
SCI,计算机相关可以写
+1/17
SCI,计算机相关可以写
+1/17
中国科学院大学-杨晗课题组-诚聘-博士后、副研究员
+1/6
【博士后/科研助理招聘-北京理工大学-集成电路与电子学院-国家杰青团队】
+1/5
2026 博士自荐-机器人机构学方向
+1/4
重庆医科大学-药学院-新靶标教育部医药基础研究创新中心-药物化学2026年博士招生
+1/4
中国科学院大学-杨晗课题组-诚聘-博士后、副研究员
+1/3
湘潭大学沈志刚教授课题组欢迎博士生报考,博士后加盟
+1/3
[招募] 上海交通大学环境健康课题组科研实习生(环境健康与生物学大数据方向)
+1/1
★ ★
zzy870720z(金币+2): 谢谢总结 2011-03-19 16:42:51
zzy870720z(金币+2): 谢谢总结 2011-03-19 16:42:51
|
I got a response from graeme: It is a little tricky to see what's going on from a list of numbers, but here's a guess. There does not appear to be a barrier for adsorption on the surface since the energy decreases from image 0->2. We typically use the NEB to find pathways between stable states. There may be a local minimum near image #2, but there is certainly a more stable adsorption geometry near image #7 which should be minimized. Then, consider what you are trying to calculate. If there is no barrier for adsorption, this band may only tell you that the energy drops as you go from CO in vacuum to CO on the surface. If that is the case, there is no need for finding a minimum energy pathway. Column 4 is the force projected along the band. A negative force means that the energy is going down along the band and a positive force means that it is going up. The distance between images can be smaller than 1 Ang. If you used twice the number of images to represent the same band, the distance between images will decrease by a factor of two. In the limit of many images, that distance between images can be arbitrarily small. There are no interatomic interactions between images along the band. [ Last edited by cenwanglai on 2011-3-19 at 15:32 ] |
2楼2011-03-19 15:29:54












回复此楼