| 查看: 654 | 回复: 1 | |||
[交流]
【求助完毕】NEB过渡态计算neb.dat中force的正负是什么意思？
|
|
这是我在官网论坛上提的问题（http://theory.cm.utexas.edu/foru ... 27&p=2933#p2933），请教！ I have got a neb.dat read like below: 0 0.000000 0.000000 -0.010838 0 1 0.867271 -0.837088 -1.279897 1 2 1.768503 -1.026423 -1.128849 2 3 2.584773 -0.937171 -2.621561 3 4 3.429818 -0.846114 -0.975741 4 5 4.433803 -1.987181 -2.796546 5 6 5.509804 -2.035966 -3.951533 6 7 6.561177 -2.989551 0.890184 7 8 7.546694 -2.312575 -0.077526 8 (1)What does a positive or a negative force item mean in the fourth column? Do the plus or minus sign directs the movement of the images? (2)The distance between two nearby images is supposed to be lower than 1 Angstrom? (3)Can anyone give me some advice about the 7th line with the lowest energy? The 8th line has been relaxed to ground state and is supposed to be CO-adsorbed-slab Final State. And the first line stands for configuration that CO in the vacuum off the slab surface. [ Last edited by cenwanglai on 2011-3-19 at 15:27 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有10人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有11人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有10人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有12人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 金属锌五配位的，如何通过计算判断其为三角双锥还是四方锥
已经有9人回复
- 请问光子态密度（photonic mode density）的确切物理含义为何？
已经有5人回复
- NEB计算扩散路径的力收敛精度设置问题
已经有16人回复
- vasp计算neb忽然停掉了！如果想继续算我应该怎么办呐？
已经有8人回复
- NEB计算过渡态和反应路径
已经有9人回复
- 计算neb出错，请高手帮忙看看
已经有27人回复
- 新手请教用NEB方法计算energy barrier.
已经有15人回复
- vasp用neb计算迁移势垒
已经有11人回复
- 【文献学习】JACS上一篇纯DFT计算的文献： CI-NEB计算，Leuwdin布局分析，态密度分析
已经有30人回复
- 【求助】NEB算过渡态出现致命错误
已经有5人回复
- 【其他】vasp neb 计算讨论
已经有20人回复
- 【求助成功】怎么样提高NEB计算速度?
已经有19人回复
- 【讨论】NEB寻找过渡态专题讨论
已经有49人回复
★ ★
zzy870720z(金币+2): 谢谢总结 2011-03-19 16:42:51
zzy870720z(金币+2): 谢谢总结 2011-03-19 16:42:51
|
I got a response from graeme: It is a little tricky to see what's going on from a list of numbers, but here's a guess. There does not appear to be a barrier for adsorption on the surface since the energy decreases from image 0->2. We typically use the NEB to find pathways between stable states. There may be a local minimum near image #2, but there is certainly a more stable adsorption geometry near image #7 which should be minimized. Then, consider what you are trying to calculate. If there is no barrier for adsorption, this band may only tell you that the energy drops as you go from CO in vacuum to CO on the surface. If that is the case, there is no need for finding a minimum energy pathway. Column 4 is the force projected along the band. A negative force means that the energy is going down along the band and a positive force means that it is going up. The distance between images can be smaller than 1 Ang. If you used twice the number of images to represent the same band, the distance between images will decrease by a factor of two. In the limit of many images, that distance between images can be arbitrarily small. There are no interatomic interactions between images along the band. [ Last edited by cenwanglai on 2011-3-19 at 15:32 ] |
2楼2011-03-19 15:29:54
30