| 查看: 623 | 回复: 1 | |||
[交流]
【求助完毕】NEB过渡态计算neb.dat中force的正负是什么意思?
|
|
这是我在官网论坛上提的问题(http://theory.cm.utexas.edu/foru ... 27&p=2933#p2933),请教! I have got a neb.dat read like below: 0 0.000000 0.000000 -0.010838 0 1 0.867271 -0.837088 -1.279897 1 2 1.768503 -1.026423 -1.128849 2 3 2.584773 -0.937171 -2.621561 3 4 3.429818 -0.846114 -0.975741 4 5 4.433803 -1.987181 -2.796546 5 6 5.509804 -2.035966 -3.951533 6 7 6.561177 -2.989551 0.890184 7 8 7.546694 -2.312575 -0.077526 8 (1)What does a positive or a negative force item mean in the fourth column? Do the plus or minus sign directs the movement of the images? (2)The distance between two nearby images is supposed to be lower than 1 Angstrom? (3)Can anyone give me some advice about the 7th line with the lowest energy? The 8th line has been relaxed to ground state and is supposed to be CO-adsorbed-slab Final State. And the first line stands for configuration that CO in the vacuum off the slab surface. [ Last edited by cenwanglai on 2011-3-19 at 15:27 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
航天502所 高瑛珂博士 婚内征婚 欺骗女性开房
已经有26人回复
26/27申博
已经有4人回复
地球科学部D01口青年基金,最低几A几B几C才能有几率中呀。
已经有4人回复
博士申请
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
金属锌五配位的,如何通过计算判断其为三角双锥还是四方锥
已经有9人回复
请问光子态密度(photonic mode density)的确切物理含义为何?
已经有5人回复
NEB计算扩散路径的力收敛精度设置问题
已经有16人回复
vasp计算neb忽然停掉了!如果想继续算我应该怎么办呐?
已经有8人回复
NEB计算过渡态和反应路径
已经有9人回复
计算neb出错,请高手帮忙看看
已经有27人回复
新手请教用NEB方法计算energy barrier.
已经有15人回复
vasp用neb计算迁移势垒
已经有11人回复
【文献学习】JACS上一篇纯DFT计算的文献: CI-NEB计算,Leuwdin布局分析,态密度分析
已经有30人回复
【求助】NEB算过渡态出现致命错误
已经有5人回复
【其他】vasp neb 计算讨论
已经有20人回复
【求助成功】怎么样提高NEB计算速度?
已经有19人回复
【讨论】NEB寻找过渡态专题讨论
已经有49人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
公众号有偿招募推文
+1/470
清华大学深圳国际研究生院周栋课题组博士研究生招聘
+1/178
温州医科大学沈建良课题组招聘2026级博士生
+1/100
紧急招收2026年秋季入学博士生1名(福建师范大学叶应祥教授课题组)
+1/99
薄膜断层光谱仪,看透薄膜内部!🔍
+1/83
北京航空航天大学-仿生界面材料科学全国重点实验室郭林院士团队诚聘博士后
+1/81
Polymers期刊特刊Polymeric Materials for Advanced Drug Delivery组稿
+1/75
87 年东北人定居苏州寻找良缘
+1/67
西工大国家级青年人才招聘微尺度传热方向博士后/研究助理
+1/32
海南大学国家高层次人才团队硕、博士招生
+1/29
湖南师范大学(211,双一流)-有机化学-申请审核制博士招生
+1/28
博士申请
+1/20
【通知】北京信息科技大学仪器科学与光电工程学院招收博士研究生(2026)
+2/16
上海大学微电子学院杨军教授团队招聘带编专任教师
+1/6
上海大学微电子学院杨军教授团队招聘带编专任教师
+1/4
【通知】北京信息科技大学仪器科学与光电工程学院招聘优秀师资!
+1/3
同济大学环境学院 肖倩研究员课题组 招聘2027级硕士/博士
+1/3
哈尔滨工业大学/院士团队招收 硕士、博士
+1/2
上海大学微电子学院杨军教授团队招聘带编专任教师
+1/2
深圳大学材料学院“智能分子材料团队”招聘博士后(连续流微反应器方向优先)
+1/1
★ ★
zzy870720z(金币+2): 谢谢总结 2011-03-19 16:42:51
zzy870720z(金币+2): 谢谢总结 2011-03-19 16:42:51
|
I got a response from graeme: It is a little tricky to see what's going on from a list of numbers, but here's a guess. There does not appear to be a barrier for adsorption on the surface since the energy decreases from image 0->2. We typically use the NEB to find pathways between stable states. There may be a local minimum near image #2, but there is certainly a more stable adsorption geometry near image #7 which should be minimized. Then, consider what you are trying to calculate. If there is no barrier for adsorption, this band may only tell you that the energy drops as you go from CO in vacuum to CO on the surface. If that is the case, there is no need for finding a minimum energy pathway. Column 4 is the force projected along the band. A negative force means that the energy is going down along the band and a positive force means that it is going up. The distance between images can be smaller than 1 Ang. If you used twice the number of images to represent the same band, the distance between images will decrease by a factor of two. In the limit of many images, that distance between images can be arbitrarily small. There are no interatomic interactions between images along the band. [ Last edited by cenwanglai on 2011-3-19 at 15:32 ] |
2楼2011-03-19 15:29:54











回复此楼