| 查看: 3200 | 回复: 13 | |||
[交流]
IEEE ACCESS 审稿意见大家帮忙分析分析
|
|||
大家好~第一次投稿，编辑给的意见是建议修改后重投，两个接收，还有一个拒绝（意见很尖锐 ），大家可以帮忙分析下要不要换reviewers（第二个审稿人有点一股脑否定的意思..）下面是三位审稿人的意见： Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Accept (minor edits) Comments: What additional benefits would this research bring to the readers of this journal? What different this research from the previously published papers on the topic? Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes. Because Code comments contain valuable information to support software development, especially during code reading and code maintenance. It is very important to classifying code comments for provide better data for program understanding. But please explain what additional benefits would this research bring to the readers of this journal? What different this research from the previously published papers on the topic? Is the paper technically sound?: Yes. Very technically... Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Most of reference from proceeding/conference. Maybe can include from journal of index. The reader suggests that the authors could collect more publications to enhance all these code comments. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Reject (do not encourage resubmit) Comments: It is a novel apporach for understanding the comments from program, however, from the paper, I did not find the most impacted contributions to techniques. While authors of this paper did not clearly defined how this code-comments to texts or sentence classifications. That's what we expect to see how AI or methods understanding and assessments. Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Somehow or No Is the paper technically sound?: Somehow or No Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Maybe Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes Reviewer: 3 Recommendation: Accept (minor edits) Comments: It is a well-presented paper on an important topic about automatic code-comment assesment. Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes, paper has a contribution to the body of knowledge, it presents a framework for assessment of code comments using Multi Layer Perceptrons. Beside, it also provides a manually annotated dataset for automatic code-comment assessment approaches. Thus, it deserves to ve published. Is the paper technically sound?: The paper is well-wrtiten and well-presented. The methodology and experimentation section gives the appropriate technical details about the methodolodgy proposed. Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: The depth of the detail in both data preperation and Dcomment framework they proposed were satisfactory. Besides, it also includes comprehensible literature review on topic. Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: All major works has been cited. The level of references provided in the paper is satisfactory. 又看了一遍第二个审稿人的意见，我好气哦，感觉不像自己这个领域的...不知道怎么说服他  |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
一志愿北交大材料工程总分358求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
材料专硕322
已经有3人回复
-
336材料与化工085600求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
化学调剂
已经有16人回复
-
320分人工智能调剂
已经有8人回复
-
（调剂）一志愿报考哈尔滨工业大学0857资源与环境专业378分考生
已经有7人回复
-
331求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
材料334求调剂
已经有16人回复
-
308求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
332求调剂
已经有15人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
长江大学化学与环境工程学院2026年硕士研究生调剂公告（理学、工学均可）
+5/845
-
浙江农林大学环境与资源学院/碳中和学院 招收调剂生，学硕1名、专硕2名
+1/98
-
湖南工业大学周贵寅组招生物医学工程（学硕07、08都行）和生物与医药（专硕08）硕士生
+1/87
-
安徽宿州学院 085600材料与化工(专业学位) 2026年研究生招生调剂信息
+1/85
-
武汉纺织大学学硕调剂
+2/50
-
聊城大学材料科学与工程学院光功能高分子材料课题组招收调剂研究生
+1/44
-
福建医科大学生信系饶世涛老师2026年招收调剂优秀硕士生1名-生物医学信息学
+1/40
-
西南民族大学广招硕士调剂生！快到碗里来！
+1/39
-
【硕士调剂】【分子医学 10医类 最后机会】2026年青岛大学硕士调剂补招
+1/21
-
华南师范大学光电科学与工程学院魏嵬课题组招收硕士调剂生
+1/13
-
中国石油大学（北京）理学院2026年硕士研究生接收调剂生：物理、化学、材料等
+1/12
-
大连工业大学招生 08工学：化工、环境、材料 07理学:化学 调剂招生！
+1/9
-
湖南大学白玉罡课题组招收2026年入学博士生（第二批补录）
+1/9
-
一志愿211电子信息347求调剂
+1/9
-
齐鲁工业大学 国家重点实验室-新能源、锂离子电池、材料、化学方向
+1/6
-
烟台大学精准材料高等研究院26年材料方向研究生招生
+1/5
-
长江师范学院化学化工学院化学工程方向接收大量调剂考生
+1/5
-
齐齐哈尔大学李莉课题组诚招2026级考研调剂生（学硕和专硕）
+1/4
-
调剂招生
+1/3
-
齐齐哈尔大学化学与化学工程学院招收专硕调剂
+1/2
6楼2019-10-27 17:59:54
10楼2019-10-27 18:34:02
11楼2019-10-27 19:08:04
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
我有一个审稿人直接拒稿不接受重投 只说了一句文章缺乏创新 其他三个审稿人接受小的修改 编辑给的拒稿重投 我回应了每一个审稿人 包括拒稿不鼓励重投的 在cover letter中写明是否可以更换拒稿的审稿人 其实编辑在邮件中也说了 可以考虑是否更换审稿人 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
12楼2019-10-28 07:26:43
13楼2019-12-29 09:53:38
14楼2020-01-28 14:55:38
简单回复
一品哥哥2楼
2019-10-27 17:32
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
， 发自小木虫Android客户端
爱星3楼
2019-10-27 17:39
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
超级老快4楼
2019-10-27 17:39
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
q 发自小木虫IOS客户端
nono20095楼
2019-10-27 17:39
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
·
tzynew7楼
2019-10-27 18:00
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
LWJL20198楼
2019-10-27 18:11
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
2019-10-27 18:33
回复
