| 查看: 3156 | 回复: 13 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
IEEE ACCESS 审稿意见大家帮忙分析分析
|
|||
大家好~第一次投稿，编辑给的意见是建议修改后重投，两个接收，还有一个拒绝（意见很尖锐 ），大家可以帮忙分析下要不要换reviewers（第二个审稿人有点一股脑否定的意思..）下面是三位审稿人的意见： Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Accept (minor edits) Comments: What additional benefits would this research bring to the readers of this journal? What different this research from the previously published papers on the topic? Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes. Because Code comments contain valuable information to support software development, especially during code reading and code maintenance. It is very important to classifying code comments for provide better data for program understanding. But please explain what additional benefits would this research bring to the readers of this journal? What different this research from the previously published papers on the topic? Is the paper technically sound?: Yes. Very technically... Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Most of reference from proceeding/conference. Maybe can include from journal of index. The reader suggests that the authors could collect more publications to enhance all these code comments. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Reject (do not encourage resubmit) Comments: It is a novel apporach for understanding the comments from program, however, from the paper, I did not find the most impacted contributions to techniques. While authors of this paper did not clearly defined how this code-comments to texts or sentence classifications. That's what we expect to see how AI or methods understanding and assessments. Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Somehow or No Is the paper technically sound?: Somehow or No Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Maybe Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes Reviewer: 3 Recommendation: Accept (minor edits) Comments: It is a well-presented paper on an important topic about automatic code-comment assesment. Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes, paper has a contribution to the body of knowledge, it presents a framework for assessment of code comments using Multi Layer Perceptrons. Beside, it also provides a manually annotated dataset for automatic code-comment assessment approaches. Thus, it deserves to ve published. Is the paper technically sound?: The paper is well-wrtiten and well-presented. The methodology and experimentation section gives the appropriate technical details about the methodolodgy proposed. Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: The depth of the detail in both data preperation and Dcomment framework they proposed were satisfactory. Besides, it also includes comprehensible literature review on topic. Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: All major works has been cited. The level of references provided in the paper is satisfactory. 又看了一遍第二个审稿人的意见，我好气哦，感觉不像自己这个领域的...不知道怎么说服他  |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
新疆大学地质与矿业工程学院招生
已经有32人回复
-
0856材料与化工353分求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
282分材料专业求调剂院校
已经有13人回复
-
315食品工程求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
环境调剂
已经有3人回复
-
接受26届调剂生
已经有20人回复
-
考研材料与化工，求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
欢迎211本科同学，过A区国家线，A区非偏远一本，交叉学科课题组
已经有35人回复
-
304求调剂（085602一志愿985）
已经有4人回复
-
294 英二数二物化 求调剂
已经有6人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
北京信息科技大学智能机器人技术方向，联合清华培养硕生、博生，并长期招博士后
+1/84
-
江西科技师范大学微生物天然药物老师介绍
+1/81
-
2026级博士招生｜苏州国家实验室 —上海交通大学联合培养（授上交学位）
+2/80
-
2026年植物保护学/农业昆虫与害虫防治/农药学/植物病理学相关专业招收硕士研究生
+1/69
-
课题组常年招收硕士/博士研究生、博士后
+2/64
-
sciencedirect 网页打不开了，怎么解决啊？
+1/40
-
南京林业大学木质纤维功能材料国际联合创新中心招收2026级博士生（申请-考核制
+2/40
-
澳大利亚皇家墨尔本理工大学（RMIT）理学院 院士团队2026招收CSC博士生
+1/37
-
澳大利亚皇家墨尔本理工大学（RMIT）理学院 院士团队2026招收CSC博士生
+1/36
-
哈尔滨工业大学招收博士研究生（欢迎环境、生物、市政、农业、化学等专业）长期有效
+1/11
-
电力全国重点实验室双一流A类长江学者团队招2026年全日制博士1名
+2/10
-
青年长江学者团队 2026年 硕士研究生招生
+1/9
-
复旦大学集成电路学院程增光课题组急聘科研助理
+1/7
-
有可以进行大分子分子量检测的服务单位请私信，有样品需要委托检测。
+1/5
-
-分子探针等化学/生物方向博士后和研究助理
+1/4
-
天津大学浙江研究院（宁波）诚聘高分子/化学/材料方向博士后、青年特聘研究员
+1/4
-
上海交通大学化学化工学院张智涛课题组诚聘博士后
+1/3
-
CSC-UTT : CNRS 法国国家科学研究中心/utt 特鲁瓦工程技术大学 CSC博士phd全奖招生
+1/2
-
徐工-环境工程学院-招收调剂硕士
+1/2
-
315求调剂
+1/1
10楼2019-10-27 18:34:02
6楼2019-10-27 17:59:54
11楼2019-10-27 19:08:04
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
我有一个审稿人直接拒稿不接受重投 只说了一句文章缺乏创新 其他三个审稿人接受小的修改 编辑给的拒稿重投 我回应了每一个审稿人 包括拒稿不鼓励重投的 在cover letter中写明是否可以更换拒稿的审稿人 其实编辑在邮件中也说了 可以考虑是否更换审稿人 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
12楼2019-10-28 07:26:43
简单回复
一品哥哥2楼
2019-10-27 17:32
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
， 发自小木虫Android客户端
超级老快4楼
2019-10-27 17:39
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
q 发自小木虫IOS客户端
2019-10-27 18:33
回复
爱星3楼
2019-10-27 17:39
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
LWJL20198楼
2019-10-27 18:11
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
