| 查看: 3153 | 回复: 13 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
IEEE ACCESS 审稿意见大家帮忙分析分析
|
|||
大家好~第一次投稿，编辑给的意见是建议修改后重投，两个接收，还有一个拒绝（意见很尖锐 ），大家可以帮忙分析下要不要换reviewers（第二个审稿人有点一股脑否定的意思..）下面是三位审稿人的意见： Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Accept (minor edits) Comments: What additional benefits would this research bring to the readers of this journal? What different this research from the previously published papers on the topic? Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes. Because Code comments contain valuable information to support software development, especially during code reading and code maintenance. It is very important to classifying code comments for provide better data for program understanding. But please explain what additional benefits would this research bring to the readers of this journal? What different this research from the previously published papers on the topic? Is the paper technically sound?: Yes. Very technically... Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Most of reference from proceeding/conference. Maybe can include from journal of index. The reader suggests that the authors could collect more publications to enhance all these code comments. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Reject (do not encourage resubmit) Comments: It is a novel apporach for understanding the comments from program, however, from the paper, I did not find the most impacted contributions to techniques. While authors of this paper did not clearly defined how this code-comments to texts or sentence classifications. That's what we expect to see how AI or methods understanding and assessments. Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Somehow or No Is the paper technically sound?: Somehow or No Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Maybe Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes Reviewer: 3 Recommendation: Accept (minor edits) Comments: It is a well-presented paper on an important topic about automatic code-comment assesment. Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes, paper has a contribution to the body of knowledge, it presents a framework for assessment of code comments using Multi Layer Perceptrons. Beside, it also provides a manually annotated dataset for automatic code-comment assessment approaches. Thus, it deserves to ve published. Is the paper technically sound?: The paper is well-wrtiten and well-presented. The methodology and experimentation section gives the appropriate technical details about the methodolodgy proposed. Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: The depth of the detail in both data preperation and Dcomment framework they proposed were satisfactory. Besides, it also includes comprehensible literature review on topic. Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: All major works has been cited. The level of references provided in the paper is satisfactory. 又看了一遍第二个审稿人的意见，我好气哦，感觉不像自己这个领域的...不知道怎么说服他  |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
22408 275分求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
286求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
324求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
303求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
接受26届调剂生
已经有18人回复
-
A区一本交叉课题组，低分调剂，招收机械电子信息通信等交叉方向
已经有58人回复
-
招调剂
已经有22人回复
-
083000，总分284，求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
进入个人成果库好难，一下午都没进去
已经有6人回复
-
新疆大学地质与矿业工程学院招生
已经有21人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
清华-西电集成电路方向招收联培博士（普博）
+2/218
-
南京工业大学杨建教授联合苏州实验室/上硅所联合培养博生研究生
+1/183
-
湖北省楚天学子教授团队招收专硕和学硕士6名
+5/110
-
海南大学徐月山老师招生第二批博士名额2~3个，2026年9月份入学（高端设备开发方向）
+1/91
-
北京信息科技大学联合清华大学某国家重点实验室，联合培养硕生、博生，并长期招博士后
+1/86
-
东北农业大学—水利学院，招收农业水土工程、土木水利硕士研究生
+1/84
-
武汉工程大学 化学、环境、化工材料等相关专业招收调剂生
+1/84
-
Alicat多功能流量控制的气体混配技术- 艾里卡特 (Alicat)
+2/66
-
国自然的评审专家
+1/29
-
美国密苏里大学“柔性电子”课题组诚聘博士和博士后
+1/26
-
2026年北京石油化工学院环境学科-水污染控制工程方向课题组欢迎您
+1/19
-
美国密苏里大学“柔性电子”课题组诚聘博士和博士后
+1/18
-
山东大学（青岛校区）招副研究员及博士后（COF\MOF\催化\电池）
+1/17
-
调剂求导师收留 22408 340分 科班
+1/9
-
天津大学浙江研究院（宁波）诚聘高分子/化学/材料方向博士后、青年特聘研究员
+1/6
-
欢迎报考中山大学课题组，提供2026级硕士研究生名额
+1/4
-
计算三阶力常数用thirdorder扩胞时参数如何选择？临近原子数怎么取值
+1/4
-
徐工-环境工程学院-招收调剂硕士
+1/2
-
紧急博士招生 福建农林大学 生物质化学工程与机能材料团队招收申请博士1名
+1/1
-
化学、化学工程与技术专业、材料工程专业-分子模拟研究方向-招收调剂
+1/1
6楼2019-10-27 17:59:54
10楼2019-10-27 18:34:02
11楼2019-10-27 19:08:04
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
我有一个审稿人直接拒稿不接受重投 只说了一句文章缺乏创新 其他三个审稿人接受小的修改 编辑给的拒稿重投 我回应了每一个审稿人 包括拒稿不鼓励重投的 在cover letter中写明是否可以更换拒稿的审稿人 其实编辑在邮件中也说了 可以考虑是否更换审稿人 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
12楼2019-10-28 07:26:43
简单回复
一品哥哥2楼
2019-10-27 17:32
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
， 发自小木虫Android客户端
超级老快4楼
2019-10-27 17:39
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
q 发自小木虫IOS客户端
2019-10-27 18:33
回复
爱星3楼
2019-10-27 17:39
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
LWJL20198楼
2019-10-27 18:11
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
