| 查看: 3159 | 回复: 13 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
IEEE ACCESS 审稿意见大家帮忙分析分析
|
|||
大家好~第一次投稿，编辑给的意见是建议修改后重投，两个接收，还有一个拒绝（意见很尖锐 ），大家可以帮忙分析下要不要换reviewers（第二个审稿人有点一股脑否定的意思..）下面是三位审稿人的意见： Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Accept (minor edits) Comments: What additional benefits would this research bring to the readers of this journal? What different this research from the previously published papers on the topic? Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes. Because Code comments contain valuable information to support software development, especially during code reading and code maintenance. It is very important to classifying code comments for provide better data for program understanding. But please explain what additional benefits would this research bring to the readers of this journal? What different this research from the previously published papers on the topic? Is the paper technically sound?: Yes. Very technically... Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Most of reference from proceeding/conference. Maybe can include from journal of index. The reader suggests that the authors could collect more publications to enhance all these code comments. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Reject (do not encourage resubmit) Comments: It is a novel apporach for understanding the comments from program, however, from the paper, I did not find the most impacted contributions to techniques. While authors of this paper did not clearly defined how this code-comments to texts or sentence classifications. That's what we expect to see how AI or methods understanding and assessments. Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Somehow or No Is the paper technically sound?: Somehow or No Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Maybe Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes Reviewer: 3 Recommendation: Accept (minor edits) Comments: It is a well-presented paper on an important topic about automatic code-comment assesment. Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes, paper has a contribution to the body of knowledge, it presents a framework for assessment of code comments using Multi Layer Perceptrons. Beside, it also provides a manually annotated dataset for automatic code-comment assessment approaches. Thus, it deserves to ve published. Is the paper technically sound?: The paper is well-wrtiten and well-presented. The methodology and experimentation section gives the appropriate technical details about the methodolodgy proposed. Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: The depth of the detail in both data preperation and Dcomment framework they proposed were satisfactory. Besides, it also includes comprehensible literature review on topic. Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: All major works has been cited. The level of references provided in the paper is satisfactory. 又看了一遍第二个审稿人的意见，我好气哦，感觉不像自己这个领域的...不知道怎么说服他  |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
290求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
伙伴们，祝我生日快乐吧
已经有9人回复
-
281求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
工科278分求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
考研一志愿长安大学材料与化工309分请求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
304求调剂（085602一志愿985）
已经有9人回复
-
0856材料与化工309分求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
282分材料专业求调剂院校
已经有24人回复
-
材料工程085601调剂求老师收留
已经有11人回复
-
化工学硕306求调剂
已经有7人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
南京工业大学杨建教授联合苏州实验室/上硅所联合培养博生研究生
+1/180
-
男征女，上海找一个真诚结婚的女朋友
+1/171
-
山东师范大学有机化学专业胡忠燕老师课题组招收2026届硕士研究生以及调剂生
+1/52
-
西安建筑科技大学，樊重庆课题组招收调剂研究生1名。
+2/40
-
澳大利亚皇家墨尔本理工大学（RMIT）理学院 院士团队2026招收CSC博士生
+1/36
-
中科院化学所 宋延林 课题组招聘合成化学方向博士后（开展打印合成化学方向研究）
+1/34
-
诚聘助理研究员 - 物理/材料/机械相关专业博士
+2/34
-
福建师范大学化学与材料学院杜克钊团队博士/硕士招生
+1/19
-
招博士，申请考核制，环境化学、理论计算、环境毒理/健康方向
+1/17
-
武汉理工大学汽车工程学院低碳能源与光电传感实验室2026博士招生
+1/16
-
重庆大学诚招2026年生物材料方向博士生
+1/15
-
北航国新院郑爽教授2026年招生招聘（江雷院士团队/仿生界面材料全国重点实验室）
+1/13
-
湖南大学材料科学与工程学院招收博士研究生
+1/9
-
江西理工大学稀土学院/国家稀土功能材料创新中心招收博士研究生和调剂硕士研究生
+1/9
-
上海中医药大学 谢老师课题组招收2026年申请考核博士生1名
+1/7
-
中科院深圳先进技术研究院-宁波诺丁汉大学2026年联合培养博士研究生招生
+1/6
-
长江大学武汉校区石油工程学院人才招聘-2026
+1/6
-
海南大学徐月山老师招生第二批博士名额2~3个，2026年9月份入学（高端设备开发方向）
+1/4
-
大湾区大学-哈尔滨工业大学（深圳）联培博士招生
+1/3
-
东北农业大学（211）水利工程招生
+1/2
11楼2019-10-27 19:08:04
6楼2019-10-27 17:59:54
10楼2019-10-27 18:34:02
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
我有一个审稿人直接拒稿不接受重投 只说了一句文章缺乏创新 其他三个审稿人接受小的修改 编辑给的拒稿重投 我回应了每一个审稿人 包括拒稿不鼓励重投的 在cover letter中写明是否可以更换拒稿的审稿人 其实编辑在邮件中也说了 可以考虑是否更换审稿人 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
12楼2019-10-28 07:26:43
简单回复
一品哥哥2楼
2019-10-27 17:32
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
， 发自小木虫Android客户端
超级老快4楼
2019-10-27 17:39
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
q 发自小木虫IOS客户端
2019-10-27 18:33
回复
爱星3楼
2019-10-27 17:39
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
LWJL20198楼
2019-10-27 18:11
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
