| 查看: 3158 | 回复: 13 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
IEEE ACCESS 审稿意见大家帮忙分析分析
|
|||
大家好~第一次投稿，编辑给的意见是建议修改后重投，两个接收，还有一个拒绝（意见很尖锐 ），大家可以帮忙分析下要不要换reviewers（第二个审稿人有点一股脑否定的意思..）下面是三位审稿人的意见： Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Accept (minor edits) Comments: What additional benefits would this research bring to the readers of this journal? What different this research from the previously published papers on the topic? Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes. Because Code comments contain valuable information to support software development, especially during code reading and code maintenance. It is very important to classifying code comments for provide better data for program understanding. But please explain what additional benefits would this research bring to the readers of this journal? What different this research from the previously published papers on the topic? Is the paper technically sound?: Yes. Very technically... Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Most of reference from proceeding/conference. Maybe can include from journal of index. The reader suggests that the authors could collect more publications to enhance all these code comments. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Reject (do not encourage resubmit) Comments: It is a novel apporach for understanding the comments from program, however, from the paper, I did not find the most impacted contributions to techniques. While authors of this paper did not clearly defined how this code-comments to texts or sentence classifications. That's what we expect to see how AI or methods understanding and assessments. Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Somehow or No Is the paper technically sound?: Somehow or No Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Maybe Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes Reviewer: 3 Recommendation: Accept (minor edits) Comments: It is a well-presented paper on an important topic about automatic code-comment assesment. Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes, paper has a contribution to the body of knowledge, it presents a framework for assessment of code comments using Multi Layer Perceptrons. Beside, it also provides a manually annotated dataset for automatic code-comment assessment approaches. Thus, it deserves to ve published. Is the paper technically sound?: The paper is well-wrtiten and well-presented. The methodology and experimentation section gives the appropriate technical details about the methodolodgy proposed. Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: The depth of the detail in both data preperation and Dcomment framework they proposed were satisfactory. Besides, it also includes comprehensible literature review on topic. Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: All major works has been cited. The level of references provided in the paper is satisfactory. 又看了一遍第二个审稿人的意见，我好气哦，感觉不像自己这个领域的...不知道怎么说服他  |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
伙伴们，祝我生日快乐吧
已经有5人回复
-
274求调剂0856材料化工
已经有10人回复
-
337一志愿华南理工0805材料求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
（081700）化学工程与技术-298分求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
材料与化工304求B区调剂
已经有5人回复
-
NSFC申报书里申请人简历中代表性论著还需要在申报书最后的附件里面再上传一遍吗
已经有9人回复
-
一志愿北京化工大学材料与化工296分求调剂
已经有17人回复
-
0703化学一志愿211 总分320求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
0703求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
一志愿天津大学材料与化工275求调剂
已经有22人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
有机合成岗位招聘
+1/890
-
郑州大学付永柱课题组诚招2026年入学博士生
+1/84
-
有机化- 陆红健课题组诚招2026级、2027级博士研究生及博士后
+1/80
-
东营诚征结婚对象
+1/71
-
关于碳量子点抗菌的研究
+1/47
-
北京理工大学-化学与化工学院-招收2026级博士生 [申请-考核制]
+1/21
-
上海交通大学药学院高杨课题组诚聘博士后
+1/17
-
英国埃克塞特大学 & 法国巴黎萨克雷大学联合培养博士
+1/16
-
中国科学院苏州纳米所院士团队博士后岗位招聘
+1/15
-
博士后招聘（高薪40万+）
+1/15
-
哈尔滨理工大学材料与化学工程学院 纳米功能材料与光电催化团队 招收硕士研究生
+1/11
-
湖南大学材料科学与工程学院招收博士研究生
+1/9
-
香港中文大学（深圳）管君课题组 微纳光学方向 招收硕士、博士、博士后
+1/6
-
26考研一志愿西南交大，本科双非通信工程，寻求西南地区的08调剂名额.
+1/5
-
【第三轮招生】澳科大诚招2026年秋季硕士研究生（3月31日下午18:00截止）
+1/4
-
海南大学徐月山老师招生第二批博士名额2~3个，2026年9月份入学（高端设备开发方向）
+1/4
-
重庆交通大学山区桥梁及隧道工程国家重点实验室——Smart Concrete Lab招生
+1/2
-
一志愿南昌大学085601材料专硕，四六级已过
+1/2
-
中科院天津工业生物技术所与哈尔滨工业大学联合博士招生2026
+1/2
-
【博士招生】北方工业大学招收 机械工程方向 申请考核制博士
+1/1
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
我有一个审稿人直接拒稿不接受重投 只说了一句文章缺乏创新 其他三个审稿人接受小的修改 编辑给的拒稿重投 我回应了每一个审稿人 包括拒稿不鼓励重投的 在cover letter中写明是否可以更换拒稿的审稿人 其实编辑在邮件中也说了 可以考虑是否更换审稿人 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
12楼2019-10-28 07:26:43
6楼2019-10-27 17:59:54
10楼2019-10-27 18:34:02
11楼2019-10-27 19:08:04
简单回复
一品哥哥2楼
2019-10-27 17:32
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
， 发自小木虫Android客户端
超级老快4楼
2019-10-27 17:39
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
q 发自小木虫IOS客户端
2019-10-27 18:33
回复
爱星3楼
2019-10-27 17:39
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
LWJL20198楼
2019-10-27 18:11
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
