| 查看: 3160 | 回复: 13 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
IEEE ACCESS 审稿意见大家帮忙分析分析
|
|||
大家好~第一次投稿,编辑给的意见是建议修改后重投,两个接收,还有一个拒绝(意见很尖锐 ),大家可以帮忙分析下要不要换reviewers(第二个审稿人有点一股脑否定的意思..)下面是三位审稿人的意见: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Accept (minor edits) Comments: What additional benefits would this research bring to the readers of this journal? What different this research from the previously published papers on the topic? Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes. Because Code comments contain valuable information to support software development, especially during code reading and code maintenance. It is very important to classifying code comments for provide better data for program understanding. But please explain what additional benefits would this research bring to the readers of this journal? What different this research from the previously published papers on the topic? Is the paper technically sound?: Yes. Very technically... Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Most of reference from proceeding/conference. Maybe can include from journal of index. The reader suggests that the authors could collect more publications to enhance all these code comments. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Reject (do not encourage resubmit) Comments: It is a novel apporach for understanding the comments from program, however, from the paper, I did not find the most impacted contributions to techniques. While authors of this paper did not clearly defined how this code-comments to texts or sentence classifications. That's what we expect to see how AI or methods understanding and assessments. Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Somehow or No Is the paper technically sound?: Somehow or No Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Maybe Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes Reviewer: 3 Recommendation: Accept (minor edits) Comments: It is a well-presented paper on an important topic about automatic code-comment assesment. Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes, paper has a contribution to the body of knowledge, it presents a framework for assessment of code comments using Multi Layer Perceptrons. Beside, it also provides a manually annotated dataset for automatic code-comment assessment approaches. Thus, it deserves to ve published. Is the paper technically sound?: The paper is well-wrtiten and well-presented. The methodology and experimentation section gives the appropriate technical details about the methodolodgy proposed. Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: The depth of the detail in both data preperation and Dcomment framework they proposed were satisfactory. Besides, it also includes comprehensible literature review on topic. Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: All major works has been cited. The level of references provided in the paper is satisfactory. 又看了一遍第二个审稿人的意见,我好气哦,感觉不像自己这个领域的...不知道怎么说服他 |
» 猜你喜欢
一志愿河海大学085900土木水利专硕279求调剂不挑专业
已经有8人回复
268求调剂
已经有3人回复
材料294求调剂
已经有6人回复
0703化学求调剂
已经有3人回复
伙伴们,祝我生日快乐吧
已经有12人回复
工科材料085601 279求调剂
已经有7人回复
国自科面上基金字体
已经有3人回复
材料工程调剂
已经有6人回复
学硕285求调剂
已经有6人回复
0703化学调剂
已经有8人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
福建农林大学材料工程学院-黄彪教授课题组招收调剂硕士研究生
+3/601
山东征女友,坐标济南
+1/164
电力全国重点实验室双一流A类长江学者团队招2026年全日制博士1名
+2/94
广东工业大学-木质纤维素高值化利用团队招博士研究生
+1/85
化学化工学院 招收化工、化学、材料等相关方向研究生(学硕、专硕都有调剂名额)
+1/83
材料/化学相关专业2026级学术/专业型硕士研究生
+1/82
招硕士调剂生
+2/46
【沈阳农业大学机械专硕调剂】
+2/34
内蒙古大学杰青团队张凡教授-杨阳课题组招收博士
+1/9
食品科学与工程083200-297分
+1/8
哈尔滨理工大学材料与化学工程学院 纳米功能材料与光电催化团队 招收硕士研究生
+1/8
欢迎报考浙江工业大学埃克塞特联合学院硕士研究生
+1/6
国家杰青低维材料与器件力学团队2026年招收博士研究生
+1/4
大湾区大学-哈尔滨工业大学(深圳)联培博士招生
+1/3
海南大学徐月山老师招生第二批博士名额2~3个,2026年9月份入学(高端设备开发方向)
+1/3
中科院深圳先进技术研究院-宁波诺丁汉大学2026年联合培养博士研究生招生
+1/2
层流压差式流量测控产品在大气运维采样流量校准中的应用与优势
+1/2
新加坡国立大学招收博士后/研究助理,方向: 建筑机器人;雷达激光扫描;语义导航
+2/2
315求调剂
+1/1
复旦大学集成电路学院程增光课题组急聘科研助理
+1/1
14楼2020-01-28 14:55:38
6楼2019-10-27 17:59:54
10楼2019-10-27 18:34:02
11楼2019-10-27 19:08:04
简单回复
一品哥哥2楼
2019-10-27 17:32
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
, 发自小木虫Android客户端
超级老快4楼
2019-10-27 17:39
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
q 发自小木虫IOS客户端
2019-10-27 18:33
回复
爱星3楼
2019-10-27 17:39
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
LWJL20198楼
2019-10-27 18:11
回复
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端













),大家可以帮忙分析下要不要换reviewers(第二个审稿人有点一股脑否定的意思..)
回复此楼