24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3160  |  回复: 13
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wdz18

新虫 (初入文坛)


[交流] IEEE ACCESS 审稿意见大家帮忙分析分析

大家好~第一次投稿,编辑给的意见是建议修改后重投,两个接收,还有一个拒绝(意见很尖锐),大家可以帮忙分析下要不要换reviewers(第二个审稿人有点一股脑否定的意思..)

下面是三位审稿人的意见:

Reviewer: 1

Recommendation: Accept (minor edits)

Comments:
What additional benefits would this research bring to the readers of this journal?
What different this research from the previously published papers on the topic?

Additional Questions:
Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes. Because Code comments contain valuable information to support software development, especially during code reading and code maintenance. It is very important to classifying code comments for provide better data for program understanding. But please explain what additional benefits would this research bring to the readers of this journal?
What different this research from the previously published papers on the topic?

Is the paper technically sound?: Yes. Very technically...

Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes

Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Most of reference from proceeding/conference. Maybe can include from journal of index.
The reader suggests that the authors could collect more publications to enhance all these
code comments.


Reviewer: 2

Recommendation: Reject (do not encourage resubmit)

Comments:
It is a novel apporach for understanding the comments from program, however, from the paper, I did not find the most impacted contributions to techniques. While authors of this paper did not clearly defined how this code-comments to texts or sentence classifications. That's what we expect to see how AI or methods understanding and assessments.

Additional Questions:
Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Somehow or No

Is the paper technically sound?: Somehow or No

Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Maybe

Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes


Reviewer: 3

Recommendation: Accept (minor edits)

Comments:
It is a  well-presented paper on an important topic about automatic code-comment assesment.

Additional Questions:
Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes, paper has a contribution to the body of knowledge, it  presents a framework for assessment of code comments using Multi Layer Perceptrons. Beside, it also provides a manually annotated dataset for automatic code-comment assessment approaches.  Thus, it deserves to ve published.

Is the paper technically sound?: The paper is well-wrtiten and well-presented. The methodology and experimentation section gives the appropriate technical details about the methodolodgy proposed.

Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: The depth of the detail in both data preperation and Dcomment framework they proposed were satisfactory. Besides, it also includes comprehensible literature review on topic.

Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: All major works has been cited. The level of references provided in the paper is satisfactory.

又看了一遍第二个审稿人的意见,我好气哦,感觉不像自己这个领域的...不知道怎么说服他
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yuyu98412

木虫之王 (文坛精英)


14楼2020-01-28 14:55:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 14 个回答

songcumt

至尊木虫 (职业作家)



wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
重点不突出,或者只是一般性结论,没看出来多尖锐,好好突出一下文章新颖的地方和论述吧,再有,审稿人不是你能决定换不换的
6楼2019-10-27 17:59:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sqm12345

新虫 (正式写手)



wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
Access 一般要写多少页

发自小木虫Android客户端
10楼2019-10-27 18:34:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

weian123456

新虫 (文坛精英)



wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
妈呀,过两天准备投这期刊,审稿意见折磨敷衍吗?太少了
11楼2019-10-27 19:08:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
2019-10-27 17:32   回复  
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
2019-10-27 17:39   回复  
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
q 发自小木虫IOS客户端
2019-10-27 18:33   回复  
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
爱星3楼
2019-10-27 17:39   回复  
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
LWJL20198楼
2019-10-27 18:11   回复  
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 材料294求调剂 +3 cczaxk 2026-03-12 6/300 2026-03-13 00:03 by cczaxk
[考研] 341求调剂 +3 番茄头--- 2026-03-10 3/150 2026-03-12 21:53 by 飞仙戟羽
[考研] 315求调剂 +5 小羊小羊_ 2026-03-11 6/300 2026-03-12 20:36 by 倒数321?
[考研] 281求调剂 +6 Koxui 2026-03-12 7/350 2026-03-12 20:31 by peike
[考研] 【0856】化学工程(085602)313 分,本科学科评估A类院校化学工程与工艺,诚求调剂 +5 小刘快快上岸 2026-03-11 5/250 2026-03-12 15:53 by lijinzzc
[考研] 材料工程调剂 +3 咪咪空空 2026-03-11 3/150 2026-03-12 15:02 by 每天只摆一小会
[考研] 0817化学工程319求调剂 +8 lv945 2026-03-08 10/500 2026-03-12 05:26 by wll0811
[考研] 334求调剂 +3 mjqzz 2026-03-06 3/150 2026-03-11 20:38 by 清风月
[考研] 求调剂 +5 yfihxh 2026-03-09 5/250 2026-03-11 18:35 by 18137688336
[考研] 调剂 +5 呵唔哦豁 2026-03-10 5/250 2026-03-10 22:00 by 28375m
[考研] 085602化工求调剂 +7 董boxing 2026-03-10 7/350 2026-03-10 17:07 by BruceLiu320
[考研] 0817学硕华东区求调剂 +3 30660438 2026-03-08 3/150 2026-03-10 16:55 by Pegasus0429
[考研] 一志愿:武汉理工,材料工程,英二数二 总分314 +3 2202020125 2026-03-10 4/200 2026-03-10 13:54 by xiongyaxuan
[考研] 调剂的同学,走过路过,不要错过 +11 likeihood 2026-03-06 16/800 2026-03-10 11:38 by Djdjj12
[考研] 294 英二数二物化 求调剂 +6 米饭团不好吃 2026-03-09 6/300 2026-03-09 23:55 by barlinike
[考研] 310 070300化学求调剂 +4 扑风铃的猫 2026-03-08 5/250 2026-03-09 19:46 by 30660438
[考研] 调剂 +3 13853210211 2026-03-08 3/150 2026-03-08 19:34 by ms629
[考研] 288求调剂(0703)一志愿东北大学 +5 好好- 2026-03-07 5/250 2026-03-08 18:22 by zzpnuli111
[考研] 085701环境工程专业,初试305,均过国家A区线 +7 卡卡来了@ 2026-03-07 8/400 2026-03-08 06:40 by 刘兵
[考研] 08工科求调剂 +3 隆LLL 2026-03-06 4/200 2026-03-06 15:26 by 隆LLL
信息提示
请填处理意见