24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3152  |  回复: 13
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wdz18

新虫 (初入文坛)


[交流] IEEE ACCESS 审稿意见大家帮忙分析分析

大家好~第一次投稿,编辑给的意见是建议修改后重投,两个接收,还有一个拒绝(意见很尖锐),大家可以帮忙分析下要不要换reviewers(第二个审稿人有点一股脑否定的意思..)

下面是三位审稿人的意见:

Reviewer: 1

Recommendation: Accept (minor edits)

Comments:
What additional benefits would this research bring to the readers of this journal?
What different this research from the previously published papers on the topic?

Additional Questions:
Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes. Because Code comments contain valuable information to support software development, especially during code reading and code maintenance. It is very important to classifying code comments for provide better data for program understanding. But please explain what additional benefits would this research bring to the readers of this journal?
What different this research from the previously published papers on the topic?

Is the paper technically sound?: Yes. Very technically...

Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes

Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Most of reference from proceeding/conference. Maybe can include from journal of index.
The reader suggests that the authors could collect more publications to enhance all these
code comments.


Reviewer: 2

Recommendation: Reject (do not encourage resubmit)

Comments:
It is a novel apporach for understanding the comments from program, however, from the paper, I did not find the most impacted contributions to techniques. While authors of this paper did not clearly defined how this code-comments to texts or sentence classifications. That's what we expect to see how AI or methods understanding and assessments.

Additional Questions:
Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Somehow or No

Is the paper technically sound?: Somehow or No

Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Maybe

Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes


Reviewer: 3

Recommendation: Accept (minor edits)

Comments:
It is a  well-presented paper on an important topic about automatic code-comment assesment.

Additional Questions:
Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes, paper has a contribution to the body of knowledge, it  presents a framework for assessment of code comments using Multi Layer Perceptrons. Beside, it also provides a manually annotated dataset for automatic code-comment assessment approaches.  Thus, it deserves to ve published.

Is the paper technically sound?: The paper is well-wrtiten and well-presented. The methodology and experimentation section gives the appropriate technical details about the methodolodgy proposed.

Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: The depth of the detail in both data preperation and Dcomment framework they proposed were satisfactory. Besides, it also includes comprehensible literature review on topic.

Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: All major works has been cited. The level of references provided in the paper is satisfactory.

又看了一遍第二个审稿人的意见,我好气哦,感觉不像自己这个领域的...不知道怎么说服他
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

搞不懂の晴天

新虫 (小有名气)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
你好,你的最后接收了吗?回复那个拒收的审稿人意见了吗?

发自小木虫IOS客户端
13楼2019-12-29 09:53:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 14 个回答

songcumt

至尊木虫 (职业作家)



wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
重点不突出,或者只是一般性结论,没看出来多尖锐,好好突出一下文章新颖的地方和论述吧,再有,审稿人不是你能决定换不换的
6楼2019-10-27 17:59:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sqm12345

新虫 (正式写手)



wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
Access 一般要写多少页

发自小木虫Android客户端
10楼2019-10-27 18:34:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

weian123456

新虫 (文坛精英)



wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
妈呀,过两天准备投这期刊,审稿意见折磨敷衍吗?太少了
11楼2019-10-27 19:08:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
2019-10-27 17:32   回复  
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
2019-10-27 17:39   回复  
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
q 发自小木虫IOS客户端
2019-10-27 18:33   回复  
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
爱星3楼
2019-10-27 17:39   回复  
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
LWJL20198楼
2019-10-27 18:11   回复  
wdz18(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 0703求调剂 +3 c297914 2026-03-06 3/150 2026-03-07 14:36 by lishahe
[考研] 诚求调剂,323分 有专利/科研/实习经历 +5 橙子cyx 2026-03-06 6/300 2026-03-06 20:05 by wangjihu
[考研] 材料学硕318求调剂 +13 February_Feb 2026-03-01 13/650 2026-03-06 15:30 by GGOND
[考研] 085600材料与化工调剂 280分 +13 yyqqhh 2026-03-03 13/650 2026-03-06 11:29 by 2020015
[考研] 085600,一志愿郑州大学,280分求调剂 +7 Wuqi725 2026-03-05 7/350 2026-03-06 08:12 by 杨杨杨紫
[考研] 欢迎采矿、地质、岩土、计算机、人工智能等专业的同学报考 +10 pin8023 2026-02-28 13/650 2026-03-05 18:54 by 3367308522
[考研] 301求调剂 +4 李LJR 2026-03-04 4/200 2026-03-05 13:31 by Iveryant
[考研] 一志愿清华深研院材料专硕294分,专业课111分,本科中南大学材料,有六级,有工作经验 +3 H14528 2026-03-04 3/150 2026-03-05 10:35 by ms629
[考研] 一志愿武汉理工大学-085602-总分296分-求调剂 +7 紫川葡柚 2026-03-04 7/350 2026-03-04 21:04 by kakakapanpan
[考研] 一志愿985材料与化工 326分求调剂 +3 Hz795795 2026-03-04 3/150 2026-03-04 20:54 by wutongshun
[考研] 322,求调剂 +3 菜菜爱玩 2026-03-04 3/150 2026-03-04 12:15 by xiongyaxuan
[考研] 材料325求调剂 30+5 mariusuki 2026-03-02 10/500 2026-03-04 09:24 by njzyff
[考研] 材料工程269求调剂 +7 白刺玫 2026-03-02 7/350 2026-03-04 08:47 by zhyzzh
[考研] 环境调剂 +8 chenhanheng 2026-03-02 8/400 2026-03-03 22:13 by 刘兵
[基金申请] 请问大家,研究风险与应对措施那里, 大家都怎么写呢 ? +3 cauasen 2026-03-02 3/150 2026-03-03 19:43 by Tide man
[考研] 材料270求调剂 6+6 Eiiiio 2026-03-01 11/550 2026-03-03 15:04 by Phoebelala
[考研] 284求调剂 +6 天下熯 2026-03-02 6/300 2026-03-03 13:46 by Iveryant
[考研] 课题组接收材料类调剂研究生 +6 gaoxiaoniuma 2026-02-28 9/450 2026-03-03 09:27 by gaoxiaoniuma
[考研] 306分材料调剂 +5 chuanzhu川烛 2026-03-01 6/300 2026-03-02 19:51 by 张晓芳0105
[考研] 311求调剂 +6 亭亭亭01 2026-03-01 6/300 2026-03-01 15:41 by 324616
信息提示
请填处理意见