24СʱÈÈÃŰæ¿éÅÅÐаñ    

²é¿´: 2634  |  »Ø¸´: 34
µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû

¸£ÐÇÓã

гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)


[½»Á÷] ¾Ü¸åºóÐÞ¸ÄÖØÍ¶¸ÃÔÓÖ¾½ÓÊյĿÉÄÜÐÔÔõÑù£¿¿ÒÇëÄãÆÀ¹ÀÕâÆª¾Ü¸åÐÅ

1¸öÔÂǰ£¬Í¶Á˹úÍâÒ»·ÝѧÊõÆÚ¿¯£¨IF£º¶þµã¼¸£©£¬ÔÓÖ¾É罫decisionÓʼþ·¢»ØÀ´ÁË£ºreject£¡±à¼­²¿Òâ¼ûÈçÏÂÎÄ£¬ÇÒÓʼþÒ²¸½ÉÏÁËÍâÉó3¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û£¬¸öÈ˸оõÉó¸åÈËÌáµÄÎÊÌâºÜÓÐÖ¸µ¼ÒâÒ壬ͬʱҲºÜnice¡£ÎÒÏë´òËã°´3¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼ûÐ޸IJ¢ÕÒרҵÈËÊ¿½øÐÐÓïÑÔÈóÉ«ºóÖØÐÂÔÙͶÕâ¸öÆÚ¿¯£¬²»ÖªµÀÖØÍ¶½ÓÊܵĿÉÄÜÐÔÔõôÑù£¿´ó¼Ò·¢±íһϾ­Ñé¿´·¨°É£¬ÄãÊÇÔõÑùÆÀ¹ÀÕâ·â¾Ü¸åÐŵģ¿
ÓʼþÔ­ÎÄÕª³­ÈçÏ£º
Dear Dr. XXX,

Unfortunately, because of the quantity of papers submitted to us for consideration and our desire for expeditious publication, we can only accept approximately 20+% of the submissions, and we can only accept those works which receive the highest priority ratings from peer reviewers and editors regarding perceived reader interest, scientific quality, and timeliness of the subject matter. Although specific comments of the reviewers may seem favorable, priority assessments, relayed to us separately, may indicate that, compared to other reports, a given manuscript does not satisfy requirements for publication.

The editors appreciate the effort that goes into the preparation of a manuscript and the disappointment when it is not accepted.

The final comments of the reviewers, if available, can be found below. If the reviewers note that your paper could benefit from English language polishing, you may wish to consider having your paper professionally edited for English language by a service such as Wiley¡¯s at https://wileyeditingservices.com. Please note that while this service will greatly improve the readability of your paper, it does not guarantee acceptance of your paper by the journal.

Thank you for considering "XXXXX" for the publication of your research and we look forward to the opportunity to review future work as it becomes available.

Sincerely,
Editor, XXXX

Referee(s)' Comments to Author:
Reviewing: 1
Comments to the Author
Your paper is a Meta-analysis on the use of XXXXX and has some very interesting results worth publication in the future. The concept, analysis and results are all worth pursuing publication. However, you need to revise the paper for proper English grammar. There are many common errors in the English language that need to be corrected prior to publication.

Reviewing: 2
Comments to the Author
This is an interesting subject because it tries to evaluate that XXX might improve XXX. However, the quality of the manuscript should be improved in the following aspects:
1. Sensitivity analysis should be considered in the current study.
2. Table 4, P value should express to the same number of decimal.
3. The manuscript should be further revised by careful language editing, such as Table1, revise ¡°Stduy duration¡± as ¡°Study duration¡± in the item of table.
¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤
Reviewing: 3
Comments to the Author
In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the role of XXX ¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤ The following are my comments:
#1 Since XXX can determine XXX, only those studies in which XXX should be included. ....... Please provide this information.
#2 The manuscript needs attention from its presentation (English language) point of view.
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶

» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:

ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

dongbo10713

¾èÖú¹ó±ö (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)


¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Ð޸ĺóÖØÍ¶»ú»áºÜ´ó

·¢×ÔСľ³æIOS¿Í»§¶Ë
32Â¥2016-01-21 13:40:06
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
²é¿´È«²¿ 35 ¸ö»Ø´ð
¼òµ¥»Ø¸´
guotao0195Â¥
2016-01-21 13:17   »Ø¸´  
¸£ÐÇÓã(½ð±Ò+1): лл²ÎÓë
×£¸£ ·¢×ÔСľ³æAndroid¿Í»§¶Ë
skyish6Â¥
2016-01-21 13:17   »Ø¸´  
¸£ÐÇÓã(½ð±Ò+1): лл²ÎÓë
Ò» ·¢×ÔСľ³æIOS¿Í»§¶Ë
lanyatianv7Â¥
2016-01-21 13:20   »Ø¸´  
¸£ÐÇÓã(½ð±Ò+1): лл²ÎÓë
Ö§³Ö
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] 2026Äê8ÔÂ25ÈÕ¹ú×ÔÈ»·Å°ñǰͻȻÊÕµ½ÁÐÈëÆÀÉóר¼ÒÓʼþ£¬ÓйØÏµÂ𣿠+20 ľˮ˼¶¹ 2026-08-25 23/1150 2026-08-26 06:35 by echo8914667
[¹«Åɳö¹ú] ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8.O.551.O.5.4,¿ÆÄ¿È«,¿ÉÙ¤¼± +3 PbwVEMK5haaE 2026-08-25 5/250 2026-08-26 05:09 by cNXvBfCpiZOM
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøT0PÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,¿ÆÄ¿È«,¿É+¼± +3 7K1CJE38xLG4 2026-08-25 4/200 2026-08-26 02:04 by cNXvBfCpiZOM
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ½ñÌìÎñί»á¿ªÍêÁË£¬Ã÷Ìì³ö½á¹ûÂð +18 angus9576 2026-08-25 22/1100 2026-08-26 00:41 by merchancy
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ijЩ»ú¹¹£¬ÒÔЧÂʵÍΪÈÙ£¬ÒÔЧÂʵÍ×÷Ϊ´æÔڸР+9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ûÓÐÈκÎÏûÏ¢-ÊDz»ÊǾÍÁ¹ÁË +9 ͼÀ²Í¼À² 2026-08-24 10/500 2026-08-25 11:59 by ÄϺ£Ð¡¸ç
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ÈËÆø²»ÐÐÁË +11 fansofjerry 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-25 11:04 by ¹Â¶ÀµÄÓ¢ÐÛ6
[½Ìʦ֮¼Ò] µ¼Ê¦Í²ۣºÎÒÔõô̯ÉÏÁËÕâô¸ö¼«Æ·Ñо¿Éú£¡ +3 ËÕ¶«ÆÂ¶þÊÀ 2026-08-23 3/150 2026-08-25 10:35 by shisan1313
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] 2026ÄêµÄ¹ú¼ÒÉç¿Æ»ù½ðÏîĿͨѶÆÀÉóµÄйæÔòÓëж¯Ïò¡¢ÐÂÌôÕ½ +5 process2012 2026-08-23 7/350 2026-08-25 09:42 by huixian257
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ÎÒÃæÉÏÍêµ°ÁË +13 ÇÒÌý»¢Ð¥ 2026-08-20 14/700 2026-08-25 09:10 by mrkang
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ·¶½øÖоÙÒ»ÎĵÄÖÐÐÄ˼Ïë +7 Ñ׻ƹóëÐ 2026-08-22 8/400 2026-08-25 08:48 by ZJTJZ
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] filecode£¬4¸öjtjcÁË +14 ziyangfang 2026-08-19 17/850 2026-08-24 18:37 by ¹þ¹þ¸ò£¿
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ÈÃÎÒÖÐÒ»¸öÃæÉϰɣ¡ +13 ´óƼ1987 2026-08-20 16/800 2026-08-24 10:23 by ̫ɵÁË
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ¿ÆÑй¶ùÌ«ÄÑÁË +18 ÎÒ4´ó°×²Ë 2026-08-20 19/950 2026-08-24 09:47 by ¿­¶÷¹ãÊ¢´ß»¯·ÖÎ
[½Ìʦ֮¼Ò] Ìø²ÛºóÔÚÑÐÏîÄ¿Ôõô°ì£¿ +5 ¼òµ¥»¯xn 2026-08-22 10/500 2026-08-23 12:38 by ¼òµ¥»¯xn
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ½ñÌì·Å°ñÂ𣿠+15 ²¼²¼ºÍÒ»¶þ 2026-08-19 16/800 2026-08-23 09:55 by ÕÅ´ºÉú
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ¿´À´½ñÌì²»»á·Å°ñÁË£¿ +8 chengyan1220 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-21 17:52 by dcqxinyang
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] Ó¦¸ÃÊÇÏÂÖÜÈý26ÈÕ¹«²¼Á˰ɣ¿ +4 ¹þ¹þ¸ò£¿ 2026-08-21 4/200 2026-08-21 10:58 by Vivilian
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] ½ñÌì·Å°ñûϷÁ衃 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-19 11/550 2026-08-21 10:06 by gltch
[»ù½ðÉêÇë] »ù½ð°¡»ù½ð +4 longfie172 2026-08-20 4/200 2026-08-21 08:58 by mark mao
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û