| ²é¿´: 1508 | »Ø¸´: 3 | ||
¸£ÐÇÓãгæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
¾Ü¸åºóÐÞ¸ÄÖØÍ¶¸ÃÔÓÖ¾½ÓÊյĿÉÄÜÐÔÈçºÎ£¿¿ÒÇëÄãÆÀ¹ÀÕâÆª¾Ü¸åÐÅ ÒÑÓÐ1È˲ÎÓë
|
|
Ô¼1¸öÔÂǰ£¬Í¶ÁËÒ»¸ö¹úÍâÁ½·Ö¶àµÄѧÊõÆÚ¿¯£¬½ñÌìÔÓÖ¾É罫decisionÓʼþ·¢»ØÀ´ÁË£ºreject£¡±à¼²¿Òâ¼ûÈçÏÂÎÄ£¬ÇÒÓʼþÒ²¸½ÉÏÁËÍâÉó3¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û£¬¸öÈ˸оõÉó¸åÈËÌáµÄÎÊÌâºÜÓмûµØ£¬Í¬Ê±Ò²ºÜnice¡£ÎÒÏë´òËã°´3¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼ûÐ޸IJ¢ÕÒרҵÈËÊ¿½øÐÐÓïÑÔÈóÉ«ºóÖØÐÂÔÙͶÕâ¸öÆÚ¿¯£¬²»ÖªµÀÖØÍ¶½ÓÊܵĿÉÄÜÐÔÔõôÑù£¿´ó¼Ò·¢±íһϾÑé¿´·¨°É£¬ÄãÊÇÔõÑùÆÀ¹ÀÕâ·â¾Ü¸åÐŵģ¿ ÓʼþÔÎÄÕª³ÈçÏ£º Dear Dr. XXX, Unfortunately, because of the quantity of papers submitted to us for consideration and our desire for expeditious publication, we can only accept approximately 20+% of the submissions, and we can only accept those works which receive the highest priority ratings from peer reviewers and editors regarding perceived reader interest, scientific quality, and timeliness of the subject matter. Although specific comments of the reviewers may seem favorable, priority assessments, relayed to us separately, may indicate that, compared to other reports, a given manuscript does not satisfy requirements for publication. The editors appreciate the effort that goes into the preparation of a manuscript and the disappointment when it is not accepted. The final comments of the reviewers, if available, can be found below. If the reviewers note that your paper could benefit from English language polishing, you may wish to consider having your paper professionally edited for English language by a service such as Wiley¡¯s at https://wileyeditingservices.com. Please note that while this service will greatly improve the readability of your paper, it does not guarantee acceptance of your paper by the journal. Thank you for considering "XXXXX" for the publication of your research and we look forward to the opportunity to review future work as it becomes available. Sincerely, Editor, XXXX Referee(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewing: 1 Comments to the Author Your paper is a Meta-analysis on the use of XXXXX and has some very interesting results worth publication in the future. The concept, analysis and results are all worth pursuing publication. However, you need to revise the paper for proper English grammar. There are many common errors in the English language that need to be corrected prior to publication. Reviewing: 2 Comments to the Author This is an interesting subject because it tries to evaluate that XXX might improve XXX. However, the quality of the manuscript should be improved in the following aspects: 1. Sensitivity analysis should be considered in the current study. 2. Table 4, P value should express to the same number of decimal. 3. The manuscript should be further revised by careful language editing, such as Table1, revise ¡°Stduy duration¡± as ¡°Study duration¡± in the item of table. ¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤ Reviewing: 3 Comments to the Author In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the role of XXX ¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤ The following are my comments: #1 Since XXX can determine XXX, only those studies in which XXX should be included. ....... Please provide this information. #2 The manuscript needs attention from its presentation (English language) point of view. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
327Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
307Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
283·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211£¬0703»¯Ñ§305·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
»·¾³×¨Ë¶µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
293µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
338Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Çó²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ö£ÖÝ´óѧ289·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÄÏʦ·¶´óѧ0702ÎïÀíѧ305µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ30È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
¾Ü¸åºóÐÞ¸ÄÖØÍ¶¸ÃÔÓÖ¾½ÓÊյĿÉÄÜÐÔÔõÑù£¿¿ÒÇëÄãÆÀ¹ÀÕâÆª¾Ü¸åÐÅ
ÒѾÓÐ34È˻ظ´
SCIͶ¸å¹ý³Ì×ܽᡢͶ¸å״̬½âÎö¡¢¾Ü¸åºó¶Ô²ß¼°½ÓÊܺóÆÚÏà¹ØÎÊ´ð
ÒѾÓÐ142È˻ظ´
JAPS±»¾Ü¸åºó£¬ÊÇÖØÍ¶»¹ÊǸÄÍ¶ÄØ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
¾Ü¸åÖØÍ¶ÎÊÌâ¡£Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ·ÖÎö»¹Ðè²»ÐèÒªÖØÍ¶¸ÃÔÓÖ¾
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
SSCI¿¯ÎҪÇóÕÒÆäÖ÷Ò³ÍÆ¼öµÄÈóÉ«¹«Ë¾£¬ÎÒ¸ÃÈçºÎ»Ø¸´£¿
ÒѾÓÐ24È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸åÒ»¸öÔ±»¾Ü£¬±à¼»ØÐÅ˵¿ÉÒÔÐ޸ĺóÖØÍ¶£¬µ½µ×ʲôÒâ˼£¿
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
lÁ½¸ö´óÐÞ£¬±à¼¾Ü¸å£¬ÊÇ·ñ¿ÉÖØÍ¶¸ÃÔÓÖ¾£¿
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
¸ÄÂÛÎijÉshort communicationÖØÍ¶£¬Í¶ºóÒÔ²»·ûºÏÒªÇ󱻾ܣ¬»¹¿ÉÒÔÔÙ´ÎËõдºóÖØÍ¶Âð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸åProcess Biochemistry£¬ÏȾÝÔÙÖØÍ¶£¬ºóÓÖÌØ±ð¿ì±»¾Ü£¬ÕâÊÇʲôÇé¿ö£¿
ÒѾÓÐ28È˻ظ´
ÖØÍ¶¸ÃÔÓÖ¾µÄcovere letter
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÂÛÎÄÊý¾Ý²¹ÉÏÁË£¬Õâ¸öÊÇÖØÍ¶»¹ÊÇͶÆäËûÔÓÖ¾ºÃÄØ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Ê¥µ®Ç°Ò»ÌìÎÄÕÂĪÃûÆäÃî±»¾Ü¸å£¬ÉêË߳ɹ¦ºó½ñÌìÏ·¾ç½ÓÊÕ
ÒѾÓÐ231È˻ظ´
¾Ü¸åºóÖØÍ¶µÄÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
°ÝÇó´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´Õâ¸ö¾Ü¸åÐÅ£¿£¿£¿
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
ÎÞ½ð±Ò¡£¡£¿ÞÇó°ïÖú¡£¡£¡°±»¾Ü£¬´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´£¬ÊÇÖØÍ¶»¹ÊǸÄͶ£¿¡±
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
Chemical CommunicationsÐ޸ĺóÒòÊý¾Ý²»×ã¾Ü¸å£¿
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
Ð޸ĸåÒÑͶ2¸öÔ£¬»¹Ã»ÏûÏ¢£¬ÇóÖú£¡£¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
hncfdxcfbs
½û³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
¸£ÐÇÓã: ½ð±Ò+20, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú, ºÜÓмÛÖµµÄÒ»ÌõÆÀÂÛ£¡ 2016-01-20 22:22:37
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
¸£ÐÇÓã: ½ð±Ò+20, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú, ºÜÓмÛÖµµÄÒ»ÌõÆÀÂÛ£¡ 2016-01-20 22:22:37
|
±¾ÌûÄÚÈݱ»ÆÁ±Î |
2Â¥2016-01-20 21:22:37
¸£ÐÇÓã
гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1269.6
- É¢½ð: 35
- Ìû×Ó: 59
- ÔÚÏß: 46.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2272836
- ×¢²á: 2013-02-03
- רҵ: Ðĵç»î¶¯Òì³£ÓëÐÄÂÉʧ³£
3Â¥2016-01-20 22:23:45
crazydr
гæ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 22910.3
- É¢½ð: 3089
- ºì»¨: 71
- Ìû×Ó: 12897
- ÔÚÏß: 318.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 4013633
- ×¢²á: 2015-08-09
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Ó°ÏñҽѧÓëÉúÎïҽѧ¹¤³ÌÆä
4Â¥2016-04-11 07:31:51














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥