24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1774  |  回复: 7
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者木水火将赠送您 2 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

木水火

银虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 请大家分析拒稿原因 已有4人参与

1个月前在journal of hazardous materials投了篇文章,今天收到回复了,
Thank you for considering the Journal of Hazardous Materials for your manuscript submission. Your manuscript has been carefully examined by the editor and is being declined for further review in the Journal of Hazardous Materials.

Although your manuscript seems to fall within the aim and scope of this journal, it is being declined for lack of sufficient novelty. The Journal of Hazardous Materials publishes papers that report novel, new and innovative results in the environmental field. We must consider each manuscript's scientific impact and interest to our readership; some factors entering into this decision include things like scope, originality, quality of the results, and significance to the discipline.

Unfortunately we are unable to accept all of the sound work submitted to us. Please be aware that even technically sound articles are not published in the Journal of Hazardous Materials if they are not sufficiently novel and/or if the contribution is considered of limited interest to the journal readership.

I regret the negative outcome but appreciate having received the manuscript for review by Journal of Hazardous Materials. At the same time, we are looking forward to receiving your future submissions.

大伙帮忙分析分析,编辑到底啥意思?谢谢。
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

木水火

银虫 (初入文坛)

technically sound articles又是啥意思呢?
4楼2015-07-06 10:52:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 8 个回答

thanwen

金虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
木水火: 金币+2, 有帮助 2015-07-06 15:34:55
创新性不够,直接被编辑拒了。
再挖掘一下亮点,换杂志投吧。

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
2楼2015-07-06 10:49:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

咖喱VS土豆

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

文献杰出贡献

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
木水火: 金币+2, 有帮助 2015-07-06 15:35:04
新颖性不够,直接改投吧,别纠结了
天道酬勤
3楼2015-07-06 10:50:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Chemwpa

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
木水火: 金币+2, 有帮助 2015-07-06 15:35:19
最致命的缺点是创新性差。
即使技术含量很好的文章,如果缺乏创新性,也不会被该杂志接收。
改投吧。
5楼2015-07-06 10:52:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见