| 查看: 4249 | 回复: 9 | |||
zhuchunyue新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[交流]
请问又碰到过小修之后还重新指定审稿人审稿的吗？
|
|
投了一个微生物学杂志（Microbiology and Immunology）方面的文章，第一次结果是大修，返修当天结果就是Awaiting reviewer scores，就是送给原审稿人审稿了； 今天早上，结果返回来了是小修，就是几个语法、拼写以及用词问题，不涉及到文章内容问题，结果状态就变成Awaiting reviewer assignment。。。 这是又要重新指派审稿人的节奏吗？？ 有点晕乎啊。。 难道是我这次看到小修都是语法错误，重修速度太快了，早上8点给我的修回意见，我中午12点就返修回去了。。。。。 他是下午两点改的这种状态。。 哎 大意失荆州啊。。 主要是人生第一篇论文，拙计了。。 （因为硬币不多就10个了~ ） 下面是两次返修的意见。。 Major Revision (28-Apr-2015)： Associate Editor Comments to Author: Associate Editor Comments to the Author: (There are no comments.) Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author The manuscript by Zhu et al. evaluated attenuated Salmonella vaccine strain harboring htrA and yncD mutations. The manuscript is understandable but there are several critical points in the manuscript. (1) Authors should describe the reason why authors chose htrA and yncD double mutant strain for Salmonella enterica serovar Parathyphi A vaccine strain more. (2) Table 2 is the important result. Authors should show the result more adequately. Describe how many times the experiments were repeated and the mean ± SD. (3) How can LD50 be estimated by “logistic regression analysis” (page 6, lines 9, 10)? (4) Many grammatical and careless mistakes are found through the manuscript. I show some examples below. Page 2, line 9 and others. “the wild-type” is not accurate. “the wild-type strain” is better. Page 2, lines 10, 11. Add “a” before “human enteric fever vaccine” and “vaccine delivery vector”. Page 4, line 14. “Kanamycin” reads “kanamycin”. Page 7, line 4. Remove “assay” after “ELISA”. Page 8, line 3. “the yncD mutant and the wild-type did” should be “the yncD mutant strain and the wild-type strain”. Page 8, line 9. Add ”strains” before “(Fig. 2b)”. Page 8, line 16. Add “,” before “respectively”. Page 8, line 17. “the wild-type is” should be “the wild-type strain”. Page 9, line 1. “liter” reads “titer”. Page 9, line 3. Remove “assay” after “ELISA”. Page 9, line 4. Remove “did” after “PBS control”. Page 9, line 9. “mucin mouse model” is strange expression. Just use “mouse model”. Page 10, line 5. The sentence, “the mutant strains either lose…reduced.” is grammatically wrong. Page 10, line 13. “and was attenuated” is grammatically wrong. Page 10, line 2 from the bottom. “Up to date” is strange. “should be to have” should be “should have”. Page 11, line 3. Add a space between “under” and “development”. References. Some references use the full journal name and others use the abbreviated form. Follow the author instruction. Figure legends. Page 16, line 2. “PCR Identification” reads “PCR identification”. Page 16, lines 7, 8. “mutant and the wild-type” should be “mutant strain and the wild-type strain”. Page 16, line 8. “mucin mouse model” should be “mouse model”. Page 16, line 3 from the bottom. “ELISA assay” should be “ELISA”. Table 2 (Page 18). In the title of Table 2, “wild-type” should be “wild-type strain” and “mucin mouse model” should be “mouse model”. Figure 2 (Page 20). The label of y-axis (Lg (CFU/ml)) should be changed. Explanation of “p<0.05” is necessary. Which groups were compared? Figure 3 (Page 21). It is not necessary to show bar graphs to show LD50. A table is better. Describe SD or SEM. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author The authors present evidence that double deletion of htrA and yncD on genome of Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A resulted in remarkable decreased virulence compared with that of wild type using mucin mice model. They further show that the double deleted mutant is a candidate as an attenuate vaccine of S. Paratyphi A infection. This is an interesting work of S. Paratyphi A infection and vaccine. This reviewer has a few questions; 1. Usually, S. Pratyphi A could not infect mouse. The authors should explain about the mucin mice model which they assessed S. Paratyphi A virulence. How does S. Paratyphi A kill mice? Does S. Paratyphi A increase in any organs in mice? 2. It is interested that which gene (htrA or yncD) more contribute to the pathogenicity of S. Paratyphi A. The authors should examine the effect of each gene deletion on S. Paratyphi A virulence. --------------------------------------------------------我是华丽丽的分水岭----------------------------------------------------------- Minor Revision (09-Jun-2015)： Associate Editor Comments to Author: Associate Editor Comments to the Author: (There are no comments.) Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author The manuscript by Zhu et al. evaluated attenuated Salmonella vaccine strain harboring htrA and yncD mutations. The manuscript was significantly improved after revision. I just suggest several corrections. Page 1, line 20. “Lipopolysaccharide” reads “lipopolysaccharide”. Page 8, line 164. Remove “Co. Ltd.” Add location of the company. Page 9, line 169. “Independent-samples T test” should be “Unpaired t test”. Page 9, line 185. “bacterial sensitivity” should be “bacterial vulnerability”. Page 10, line 191. “a 33.3% of mortality rate” should be “a mortality rate of 33.3%”. Page 11, line 229. “produced” should be “observed”. Page 12, line 244. “stressed” reads “stresses”. Page 13, line 267. “date” reads “data”. Page 13, line 269. Use “as…so far” instead of “by now”. Page 20, line 401. “Independent-samples T test” should be “Unpaired t test”. Page 21, line 420. “the wild-type strains” reads “the wild-type strain”. Page 22, Figure 1. Schemas of Figure 1a and Figure 1b are opposite. DK primers are for yncD gene and HK primers are for htrA gene. Page 27, Table 1. It is better to use capitals (A, G, C, T) instead of small letters (a, g, c, t) for the oligonucleotide sequences. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author Dear Authors, Thank you for the revised manuscript. It is shown clearly for my comments. 从小修来看 审稿人1 觉得很满意 但是提了些小的语法问题 审稿人二 就是很水的写了句同意他的意思。 按照这个意思，应该会很快就给结果。。 结果 重新指定审稿人啷个意思偶。。 [ Last edited by zhuchunyue on 2015-6-10 at 19:17 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
281求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
华南理工0703化学，总分336求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
285求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
085600材料与化工301分求调剂院校
已经有13人回复
-
295求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
材料与化工专硕306分找合适调剂
已经有3人回复
-
0703调剂，一志愿天津大学319分
已经有11人回复
-
求调剂
已经有21人回复
-
材料专硕(0856) 339分求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
319求调剂
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 投文章小修后审稿人意见和编辑意见不一致听谁的？
已经有13人回复
- 小修提交后，又under review了，是又送到原来审稿人手里了吗？
已经有10人回复
- 大修之后小修，小修之后被拒了，但是有重投机会，求问我该怎么办？
已经有8人回复
- 文章给了小修，请教大家该如何处理？
已经有29人回复
- Optics Letters小修后还要返回审稿人吗？
已经有16人回复
- 文章回复小修，但是不太明白审稿人的这几个问题，求高人解释下，谢谢！
已经有7人回复
- 小修后还要送回审稿人审，是邀请新的审稿人吗？
已经有19人回复
- 文章被拒，编辑建议重投后，还是原来的审稿人么
已经有25人回复
- 一个拒稿，一个小修，再送审至哪个审稿人？
已经有7人回复
- 论文已被编辑接收，但是有一个审稿人要求小修，我还需要回复他吗?
已经有4人回复
- 悲剧啊~ 小修后又重新送审
已经有11人回复
- 大修终于回来了，要小修，有一个审稿人难缠咋办呀
已经有6人回复
- 为什么每修回一次，编辑都给我重新找新的审稿人？怎么回事？求解答
已经有14人回复
- 大修过程中，自己除了审稿人给的意见外，发现一些小的语法错误
已经有19人回复
- 小修，只有1个审稿人的意见，返回后又under review了，诡异的日期居然会改变？
已经有17人回复
- 审稿意见全是小修，认真修回后却被拒了。这是啥情况？
已经有47人回复
- 大修返回快20天，发现状态是又重新分配了审稿人，是不是要被拒了？忑忑，担心ing
已经有9人回复
- JHM二次小修 审稿人意见
已经有11人回复
- 大修之后还会送原来的审稿人吗？
已经有12人回复
- 论文小修还用返给审稿人吗
已经有13人回复
- 小修没有完全回答审稿人意见，会不会悲剧啊？
已经有21人回复
- 有一个审稿人意见明显拒了,但编辑给的是小修,录用机率有多少?
已经有29人回复
- 编辑小修，三个审稿人有一个较为负面该怎么回答
已经有7人回复
- 文章小修可否对审稿人的意见不加以答复？
已经有10人回复
- 文章小修以后编辑会再发给审稿人吗？
已经有9人回复
- 投稿MSE-C请教各位虫友，小修还会返回给审稿人吗
已经有17人回复
zhuchunyue
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 32.1
- 帖子: 20
- 在线: 3.7小时
- 虫号: 1686937
- 注册: 2012-03-13
- 专业: 特种医学(航空、航天、航海
2楼2015-06-10 18:43:18
 |
3楼2015-06-10 18:54:18
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
4楼2015-06-10 19:09:48
zhuchunyue
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 32.1
- 帖子: 20
- 在线: 3.7小时
- 虫号: 1686937
- 注册: 2012-03-13
- 专业: 特种医学(航空、航天、航海
5楼2015-06-10 19:13:17
zhuchunyue
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 32.1
- 帖子: 20
- 在线: 3.7小时
- 虫号: 1686937
- 注册: 2012-03-13
- 专业: 特种医学(航空、航天、航海
|
之前的是大修 4月份的 今天才返给我的小修意见 6月份的。。 你看错了吧。。 Minor Revision (09-Jun-2015)： Associate Editor Comments to Author: Associate Editor Comments to the Author: (There are no comments.) Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author The manuscript by Zhu et al. evaluated attenuated Salmonella vaccine strain harboring htrA and yncD mutations. The manuscript was significantly improved after revision. I just suggest several corrections. Page 1, line 20. “Lipopolysaccharide” reads “lipopolysaccharide”. Page 8, line 164. Remove “Co. Ltd.” Add location of the company. Page 9, line 169. “Independent-samples T test” should be “Unpaired t test”. Page 9, line 185. “bacterial sensitivity” should be “bacterial vulnerability”. Page 10, line 191. “a 33.3% of mortality rate” should be “a mortality rate of 33.3%”. Page 11, line 229. “produced” should be “observed”. Page 12, line 244. “stressed” reads “stresses”. Page 13, line 267. “date” reads “data”. Page 13, line 269. Use “as…so far” instead of “by now”. Page 20, line 401. “Independent-samples T test” should be “Unpaired t test”. Page 21, line 420. “the wild-type strains” reads “the wild-type strain”. Page 22, Figure 1. Schemas of Figure 1a and Figure 1b are opposite. DK primers are for yncD gene and HK primers are for htrA gene. Page 27, Table 1. It is better to use capitals (A, G, C, T) instead of small letters (a, g, c, t) for the oligonucleotide sequences. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author Dear Authors, Thank you for the revised manuscript. It is shown clearly for my comments. 是这些意见~。~ 是因为我 返修的太快的了吗？ |
6楼2015-06-10 19:15:42
 |
7楼2015-06-10 19:37:46
tibetnamco
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 72 (初中生)
- 金币: 2090
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 38
- 帖子: 801
- 在线: 112.5小时
- 虫号: 796561
- 注册: 2009-06-18
- 专业: 污染物行为过程及其环境效
8楼2015-06-10 19:47:25
zhuchunyue
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 32.1
- 帖子: 20
- 在线: 3.7小时
- 虫号: 1686937
- 注册: 2012-03-13
- 专业: 特种医学(航空、航天、航海
9楼2015-06-10 20:53:53
zhuchunyue
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 32.1
- 帖子: 20
- 在线: 3.7小时
- 虫号: 1686937
- 注册: 2012-03-13
- 专业: 特种医学(航空、航天、航海
10楼2015-06-11 13:08:42
