应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 生物医药区 » 医学 » 预防/护理 » 麻烦各位看看审稿意见是什么意思？第一次有审稿意见，怕搞砸了（护理方向）
11/1返回列表
查看: 427  |  回复: 0
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看

715291905

木虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 麻烦各位看看审稿意见是什么意思？第一次有审稿意见，怕搞砸了（护理方向）

麻烦各位看看审稿意见是什么意思？第一次有审稿意见，怕搞砸了（护理方向）谢谢大家！
1.In general with APA: be mindful of placing comma's in between author and year within in-text citations; order of authors in parentheses when more than one citation is used; proper indentation
2.There is an overgeneralization that character strengths will make the difference in a profession such as nursing especially since the focus negated to address implications of contextual/environmental factors
3.It was mentioned that the Cronbach's <alpha> was found to be 0.652-0.922 for an assessment but no citation of studies was provided.
4.In the discussion an essential indication was for nursing educators to influence mothers on building character strengths. This needs clarification since this is not a usual practice everywhere in the world where college educators have that contact and influence on mothers. Further clarification about this is warranted.
5.Specifics regarding inclusion/exclusion criteria were not delineated (for example, were students screened to ensure that they did not already have a mental health diagnosis)
6.Discuss how nurse educators are going to improve the mental health of nursing students. Many directive stated this in your discussion
7.How were findings differentiated among "study state" and "educational level
8. What are the specific implications for psychiatric nursing?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢
1楼 2015-05-22 15:00:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

智能机器人

Robot (super robot)

我们都爱小木虫

找到一些相关的精华帖子，希望有用哦~

科研从小木虫开始，人人为我，我为人人
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 715291905 的主题更新
11/1返回列表
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭