24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2908  |  回复: 48
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

鲁史一条龙

银虫 (正式写手)


[交流] Small28天出结果,贴出审稿评价大家来猜编辑(中国人)最终结果

EVALUATION:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Please rate the importance of this submission.

Reviewer #1: Should be published in this journal

Reviewer #2: Could be considered for a sister journal

--------------------

Please rate the originality of this submission.

Reviewer #1: Acceptable level of new results

Reviewer #2: Insufficient level of new results

--------------------

Please rate the scientific and technical content of this submission.

Reviewer #1: Minor inconsistencies or inaccuracies

Reviewer #2: Minor inconsistencies or inaccuracies

--------------------

Please rate the length of this submission.

Reviewer #1: Concise and correct length

Reviewer #2: Requires additional information

COMMENTS TO AUTHOR:

Reviewer #1: The manuscript by XXX et al. addresses the XXX. The paper is interesting and easy to read. Overall I like it. My only concern has to do with the efficiency of XXX process. The way the authors define it -XXX is misleading in my opinion, because it does not take into account that the XXX. Therefore I would not call this process highly efficient. E.g. XXX. The authors should fix this issue.



Reviewer #2: XXX is an interesting topic. The synthesis and coupling of  XXX is not new and manipulation of such organic/inorganic hybrids is also not new. Authors can consult the recent review Functionalized polymer nanofibers: a versatile platform for manipulating light at the nanoscale by Pan Wang, Yipei Wang and Limin Tong in Light: Science and applications, 2013 for  this topic.
Probably the only new aspect of this paper is the XXX, and this I would expect the authors would back their findings with some theoretical calculations of XXX. Therefore I think this manuscript is more suited to a more specialized journal.


--
Dr. Jipei Yuan

Small
E-mail: small@wiley-vch.de
Phone: +49 6201-606-500
Phone: +86 10-8418-7838
http://small-journal.de/
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

fujian409

银虫 (小有名气)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
要我就是拒稿,充其量给你个修改重投。好一点的话可能送第三个审稿人再评估。。
30楼2015-05-05 18:18:49
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 49 个回答

鲁史一条龙

银虫 (正式写手)


望前辈们看看这样的意见属于什么档次?Thanks
4楼2015-05-05 16:50:52
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
2015-05-05 16:38  
鲁史一条龙(金币+3): 谢谢参与
[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
2015-05-05 16:42  
鲁史一条龙(金币+3): 谢谢参与
[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
信息提示
请填处理意见