24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

kpingping

新虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 978.7
散金: 221
红花: 2
帖子: 462
在线: 153.7小时
虫号: 2304720
注册: 2013-02-27
性别: GG
专业: 结构工程

[交流] 急，请大家帮忙！帮我看看审稿人回复的这几个是什么意思呢

（1）大家帮我看看，审稿人这几个意见是什么意思呢,自己有点拿捏不准啊
第一个审稿人意见：
• In Introduction part the sentence “the researchers have not got consistent conclutions with each other” can be modified with some other words.
• In Introduction part the highlighted word “little research have been devoted to studying the effects of” can be modified.
• In Introduction part the words “and pointed put that if it was greater than one” can be modified suitably.
• In Introduction part the following sentence can be modified “got the conclusions inconsistent with each other”

比如第一条吧，是我的意思太绝对了呢，还是怎么回事呢请大家给我点意见和建议啊
However the following points to be addressed in the paper by the authors (if essentially required, can be decided based on the limitations of the journal formatting)：
特别是括号里面的这句话，到底是什么意思啊？？是根据情况，可以不考虑加到文章里的意思吗？？？？这个审稿人也没有具体说他的决定。
（1）Some more additional information related to the analysis of model using the tool MATLAB, like some sample coding/pictures/module used etc
还有这个意见，我要是把代表分析的一些相关的公式给出来，可以吗？？或者把分析方法做一个流程图给出来？？
（2）Is there any limitation in this analysis
这个分析的局限性，是不是说不好了情况就不妙了啊

第二个审稿人意见：（说是大修 major change）大家看第二个审稿人提的问题严重吗
1. What is the aim of this paper? Introducing a new method or analyzing a building? In the introduction section, the first sentence is that “In order to carry out the inelastic parametric analysis …”. This is not suitable and rational.
这条是不是要把摘要重新改改？？还是只是审稿人提到的那一句好好改改呢？？
2. A typical three storey RC building system is chosen as the example. The questions includes: 1) This structure is asymmetrical, and it couldn’t be regarded as “typical”. 2) Figure l shows that the structure has an asymmetric plan layout, and what about the vertical direction? 3) The structure has three floors and a typical storey height of 5m, as a typical structure, I think the design parameters are in conflict with most practical architectural configuration.

这个审稿人在说我的模型层高的问题，当时取得层高5米，没考虑太多（也有文献2层，层高5米的），现在不知道怎么回答了，有没人遇到这种情况，给点经验，看怎么说比较好，因为不可能重现改层高重新算了。这个审稿人的意见是大修，大修的意思到底是什么啊，是修改的内容很多？？

3. Pushover analyses were carried out both on the regular asymmetric and 。。。 . The paper only gives the force-displacement relationship of each lateral-load resisting element. It is not rigorous to neglect the pushover analysis, which includes lateral load distribution, force-displacement curve, plastic hinge distribution, etc.

4. Inelastic parametric analysis is a method, and how is it used to solve the actual questions?

回复此楼