24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 314  |  回复: 2

wxqtjw

铁虫 (职业作家)

[求助] 关于论文小修时,针对文献的回复这样回答行吗已有1人参与

论文小修,但是说文献过时了,这样回答行吗?

文献20,虽然较老,但是关于强结合界面的理论分析的很经典,至今很多人仍在以此理论为基础进行公式推导。
文献22,较老,但是stress concentration factor的分析很经典,至今仍然很多人引用。


The reference 20, although is outdated, but is very classic about the theoretical analysis of well-bonded interface. There are still a lot of people in this theory as the basis for derivation.
The reference 20, although is outdated, but is very classic in analysis of stress concentration factors, still a lot of people quote.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

哈哈哈哈,我来了
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ssssllllnnnn

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

Translator and Proofreader


【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
wxqtjw: 金币+20 2015-03-01 01:45:46
Although reference 20 is outdated in terms of time, it is still very classic about the theoretical analysis of well-bonded interface and is the theoretical basis for formula derivation in the field.

The reference 20 is outdated but it is very classic in analysis of stress concentration factors and is still cited by many scholars nowadays.

注意以后不要把although与but连用了。
2楼2015-03-01 01:15:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

james-james

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

说一个文献过时,不论中英文都不合适,
有些理科理论不随时代而变老,能量守恒都多少年了!
所以,不要评论论文老或过时。  outdated 不对

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
3楼2015-03-01 08:09:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 wxqtjw 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见