24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2327  |  回复: 10
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lqjsunny

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 论文投稿意见回来了,大修,有个reviewer意见不知道怎么回答,恳请各位大神支招啊 已有3人参与

The manuscript is not suitable for publication in its current form. There are numerous of grammar errors and at several points the paper needs to be rewritten. I suggest to the authors to be helped by a native english speaker in order to improve the english language.
The work lacks of proper experimental design (including the methods used) which leads to no critical discussion of the results. Furthermore, there are a lot of very important-relevant to the subject-missing references, especially in the subject of antibiofilm activity of natural constituents. In addition, some findings of the current study are on the contrary of the results of literature without any simple explanation or at least a discussion (e.g. Gram- bacteria less sensitive than Gram+, MIC of thymol is not so higher than MIC of antibiotics-in many cases thymol is much more effective and this happens to biofilms too, there are a lot of works with regards to the antibiofilm activity of essential oils very rich in thymol- no discussion at all).
不明白审稿人这句话什么意思“The work lacks of proper experimental design (including the methods used) which leads to no critical discussion of the results. Furthermore, there are a lot of very important-relevant to the subject-missing references,”,这是不是没有修改的机会了,为啥提到 experimental design,还是前面那句话只是原因,重要的是我的讨论部分不好,我把讨论部分改下,修会接受的机会会有多大?第一次投稿……恳请各位大神支招
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ssssllllnnnn

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

Translator and Proofreader


【答案】应助回帖

引用回帖:
7楼: Originally posted by lqjsunny at 2015-01-17 21:00:59
谢谢,我感觉就是我的讨论部分写的不好,我的是讨论结果和讨论放在一起的,刚开始确实就是简单的陈述结果也没好好的解释……现在我又重新将每个结果后面添上相关文献佐证下……您看这样可以不,还有在cover letter ...

实验设计部分再好好看看,审稿人到底为什么给出那样的结论,结合结果特别是讨论部分组织好了,特别是在逻辑上要体现出来,不是一堆数据的堆积,讨论也要注意逻辑性和各个内容的连贯性,否则相互之间会缺少有机联络。

最后一定要把语言润色好了,否则轻则反复折腾,重责审稿人和编辑失去耐心,后果很严重。
8楼2015-01-18 10:10:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 11 个回答

wdlgezi

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
我的理解,需要修改语言,格式,实验,讨论,参考文献。看修改的程度,按照意见尽量逐条修改到,有希望的!加油!

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
敢问路在何方
2楼2015-01-17 17:34:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lqjsunny

新虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by wdlgezi at 2015-01-17 17:34:03
我的理解,需要修改语言,格式,实验,讨论,参考文献。看修改的程度,按照意见尽量逐条修改到,有希望的!加油!

实验部分怎么修改&我感觉到很捉急……是重新做实验吗??审稿人太含糊了,目前我就把讨论部分、语言好好的改了……
3楼2015-01-17 18:19:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hy2001

新虫 (初入文坛)

是说你没有实验导致讨论部分写的不好
4楼2015-01-17 18:27:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见