| 查看: 2665 | 回复: 10 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
lqjsunny新虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
论文投稿意见回来了，大修，有个reviewer意见不知道怎么回答，恳请各位大神支招啊 已有3人参与
|
||
|
The manuscript is not suitable for publication in its current form. There are numerous of grammar errors and at several points the paper needs to be rewritten. I suggest to the authors to be helped by a native english speaker in order to improve the english language. The work lacks of proper experimental design (including the methods used) which leads to no critical discussion of the results. Furthermore, there are a lot of very important-relevant to the subject-missing references, especially in the subject of antibiofilm activity of natural constituents. In addition, some findings of the current study are on the contrary of the results of literature without any simple explanation or at least a discussion (e.g. Gram- bacteria less sensitive than Gram+, MIC of thymol is not so higher than MIC of antibiotics-in many cases thymol is much more effective and this happens to biofilms too, there are a lot of works with regards to the antibiofilm activity of essential oils very rich in thymol- no discussion at all). 不明白审稿人这句话什么意思“The work lacks of proper experimental design (including the methods used) which leads to no critical discussion of the results. Furthermore, there are a lot of very important-relevant to the subject-missing references,”，这是不是没有修改的机会了，为啥提到 experimental design，还是前面那句话只是原因，重要的是我的讨论部分不好，我把讨论部分改下，修会接受的机会会有多大？第一次投稿……恳请各位大神支招 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
中青基了要发朋友圈吗？
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
国社科申报系统有变化
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 请大家帮忙看下这个审稿意见怎么处理好
已经有22人回复
- 一审回来了，有点看不懂，大牛们看看是怎么回事，急啊
已经有14人回复
- 审稿意见该如何回答，reconsider my decision是啥意思？
已经有10人回复
- 大家帮我看看major revise后有希望吗？
已经有22人回复
- 如何回复SCI文章，求帮忙！
已经有9人回复
- SCI一审意见结果回来了，淡定不了喽！恳请各位大牛进来帮忙！
已经有30人回复
- 投稿JMCC，12天返回来审稿意见，大家给分析一下
已经有22人回复
- 大修后，显示awaiting reviewer selection？ 还换审稿人吗？
已经有13人回复
- 大修后的稿件状态由Awaiting AE Recommendation变为Awaiting Reviewer Scores？
已经有9人回复
- 请问这种情况是大修还是小修，另外reviewer的建议需不需要改？
已经有7人回复
- 第一次投sci的审稿意见，小虫请教～
已经有14人回复
ssssllllnnnn 
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
Translator and Proofreader
- 应助: 452 (硕士)
- 金币: 31580.9
- 红花: 100
- 帖子: 7681
- 在线: 19966.6小时
- 虫号: 3328089
- 注册: 2014-07-17
- 专业: 肿瘤发生
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
The work lacks of proper experimental design (including the methods used) which leads to no critical discussion of the results. Furthermore, there are a lot of very important-relevant to the subject-missing references, especially in the subject of antibiofilm activity of natural constituents. In addition, some findings of the current study are on the contrary of the results of literature without any simple explanation or at least a discussion (e.g. Gram- bacteria less sensitive than Gram+, MIC of thymol is not so higher than MIC of antibiotics-in many cases thymol is much more effective and this happens to biofilms too, there are a lot of works with regards to the antibiofilm activity of essential oils very rich in thymol- no discussion at all). 因为缺乏恰当的实验设计（包括所用方法），所以对结果的讨论也没能展开。没有引用许多重要相关文献；另外，有些结果与文献报道相左，却没有给出合理解释甚至没有讨论。 对于这部分意见我想你的关键是对文献不熟悉，或者不知道怎么利用文献（我猜测是前者）。没有提出重新进行实验设计或者重新实验，你可以好好看看相关文献，把实验部分内容重新组织一下，在描述具体实验时尽可能引用相关文献，以表明你的实验不是随意的，设计也是有根有据的。还有就是好好读几篇文献，参考一下对你的结果像样的讨论一下，不是对结果的简单重复。不管是好的结果、坏的结果都作出合理的解释和讨论。 语言问题需要解决，这是基本要求和前体。 |
6楼2015-01-17 23:48:51
2楼2015-01-17 17:34:03
lqjsunny
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 9 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2255.5
- 散金: 94
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 181
- 在线: 79.8小时
- 虫号: 2413055
- 注册: 2013-04-11
- 专业: 神经生物学
3楼2015-01-17 18:19:16
4楼2015-01-17 18:27:07
30