24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 2504  |  回复: 15
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

kiger

铜虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 审稿人说可以重投,而编辑直接拒稿,怎么办?

两个月前投了一篇论文到本学科顶级的期刊EPSL,今天收到意见,两个审稿人的大概意见如下:
Reviewer 1: As such I recommend that the paper be rejected at this time, but would encourage the authors to resubmit once the above concerns are addressed.
Reviewer 2:  I regret to recommend that this manuscript be rejected by EPSL in its present form but I suggest that the authors be encouraged to re-submit their work. I stay available to the authors and to the editor should you have questions about that review.
而编辑意见如下:
Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received.  You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. I am sorry for this outcome and hope you will find the reviews useful for your future submission to another journal.
For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below.
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.
我的理解是,编辑想直接拒稿,不欢迎重新投稿,希望投往其他杂志。但是,审稿人的意见都是给的重投,我本人也倾向于认真修改后重投,大家给个意见,是否可以重投?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kiger

铜虫 (小有名气)

看样子大家都不建议重投,但是该学科1区的期刊就那么几个,如果按照审稿人意见修改后,改投其他期刊,估计审稿人不会变,还不如重投原来期刊,审稿岂不是更快
8楼2014-10-22 21:52:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 kiger 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见