24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

倚天寒星

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 768.8
散金: 49
红花: 2
帖子: 251
在线: 142.4小时
虫号: 1036216
注册: 2010-06-05
专业: 合成药物化学

[交流] 编辑给这样的回复，有多大希望能被接受？

第一次投稿，前两天收到编辑的回复，如下：
   Thank you for submitting your above-mentioned paper to the European Journal of Organic Chemistry. The evaluation procedure of your contribution is now finished.
   I regret to have to inform you that, in view of the comments of the referees, we cannot accept your manuscript for publication in this form.
We invite you to send us a version revised according to the comments of the referees. If you agree, please explain in the accompanying letter which changes you have made (and, more importantly, which not, giving reasons why not) and highlight the corresponding paragraphs in the manuscript (electronically by a yellow background). The revised manuscript should be resubmitted as a new submission. Please include under "Additional Information" the Manuscript ID as well as a point-by-point response to the reviewer comments. The manuscript will be sent back to the same referees provided that they are available. If necessary, an impartial new referee may be asked for advice.

   另外，只返回了两个审稿人的意见，Reviewer 2 没任何意见同意接受，Reviewer 3 回复如下:  In my eyes the first part of the paper is not spectacular due to the literature precedence. The second part where substitution is conducted under oxidative conditions to directly provide **** is more interesting and valuable. Therefore, I feel that this chemistry deserves to be published in EJOC. However, prior to publication a mechanistic experiment has to be conducted in order to support the mechanism.  后面是一些具体的意见。
   为什么返回意见里只有Reviewer 2 和3 ，没有Reviewer1呢？？
第一次投稿，这样的回复能有多大希望接受？先谢过了。

回复此楼

人生没有后悔的机会，选择了就继续往前

1楼 2014-10-03 15:32:30

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

意得辑

捐助贵宾 (正式写手)

SCI发表辅导

应助: 118 (高中生)
金币: 27.7
散金: 5309
红花: 48
帖子: 710
在线: 624.8小时
虫号: 2645242
注册: 2013-09-10

商家已经主动声明此回帖可能含有宣传内容

★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
倚天寒星: 金币+3 2014-10-03 20:45:42

这是拒稿重投，一般来说期刊编辑会接受重投是认为论文有发表的潜力，因此建议楼主根据意见好好修改。

再投稿虽然是算作新的投稿，但编辑有提到如果审稿人有空的话，会再交由同样的审稿人处理，如此审稿速度也会加快。再投稿的时候有几件事情要注意：
1. 在”additional information”中提供此次的投稿编号
2. 给审稿人的逐点回复
3. 论文的修改处用标黄注明

逐点回复部分，同意的意见就告知在论文的何处进行了修改，如果有不同意的意见，务必要说明不同意的原因，并提供例证，切记不要忽略任何一条意见，对于同意接受的意见可以对评审表达感谢即可。

《意得辑专家视点》上有一些文章希望能对你的修稿有帮助：
再投稿注意事项http://www.editage.cn/insights/t ... -revised-manuscript
如何回应同行评审的意见http://www.editage.cn/insights/h ... s-by-peer-reviewers
回复同行评审意见的要与不要 http://www.editage.cn/insights/d ... -reviewers-comments

祝福楼主！

- Eddy博士