24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3652)
>虫友互识 (825)
>论文投稿 (263)
>休闲灌水 (220)
>导师招生 (164)
>基金申请 (146)
>文献求助 (136)
>硕博家园 (99)
>考博 (78)
>公派出国 (71)
>博后之家 (70)
>教师之家 (61)
>考研 (52)
>论文道贺祈福 (41)
>招聘信息布告栏 (39)
>找工作 (33)

返回列表

gululudeding

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 591.6
散金: 130
红花: 2
帖子: 155
在线: 35小时
虫号: 2081827
注册: 2012-10-23
专业: 骨、关节、软组织运动损伤

[交流] 编辑回信，共与各位前辈讨论

第一篇sci 终于有回信了，

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author（修改后接受）
See attached file.

Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
There are several asepcts that need to be improved:

- the title is inadequate: If it is a review of non-surgical therapeutic strategies some alternative treatments are missing: bisphosphonates, iloprost (prostaglandin-analogon (J?ger et al)), hyperbar oxygen treatment, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, non-load weight bearing, Pulsed electromagnetic fields stimulation (Ding et al. ...)
- THus, the result of literature research of these treatments need to be added; or at least some part of them as long as the title will be changed to e.g. pharmaceutical strategies
- THe structure of the manuscript need to be improved: It should be organised in INtroduction, M&M, Results, Discussion. After M&M there is no further structure by heading.
- The language needs to be improved. There are many very long sentences. In addition spelling should be checked.
- The literature research is incomplete. E.g. Floerkemeier et al. (bone turnover markers failed to predict ....). The literature research needs to be completed.

Detailed:
- after introduction of the abbreviation SONFH it should be used througout the manuscript
- page 1; first paragraph of introduction: “what′s“ is not written english
- please add literature for the statement of the second paragraph of the introduction (multifactorial biomarkers)
- protein-to protein (PPI) – here a word is missing
- page 1: 3rd paragraph of introduction: Various non-surgical (of is too much).
- Check spaces after commata and before brackets.
- Literature should be mentioned at the end of the sentence unless the author′s name is mentioned.

Reviewer: 3

Comments to the Author
1. There are not more outstanding insights of this review than that of related reviews.
2. The title of this review is too big. A profound review for biomarkers related to SONFH pathogenesis and non-surgical therapeutic strategies will be difficult.

结果会怎样？谢谢各位了

回复此楼