| 查看: 3209 | 回复: 11 | ||
awyatn银虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
TSCAS2-Resubmit after Minor Revision
|
|
|
resubmit了3次，现在是Resubmit after Minor Revision，都要疯掉了！一下comments Dear XXX: I am writing to inform you that the review process for your paper has been completed. Based on the recommendation of the Associate Editor, your paper cannot be accepted for publication in the present form.I suggest that you revise the manuscript to incorporate the reviewers' comments and/or suggestions and resubmit the revised version. In your revision, please carefully address all concerns raised by the reviewers. Please note that no second revision will be granted. If you fail to address any review comment, your manuscript will be rejected.Your revision should be submitted to the same web system within the next three weeks for further processing. Failure to do so will result in the elimination of your manuscript from the system. Please contact us if there is an emergency that prevents you from meeting the deadline. Thank you for considering the Transactions on CAS II. Jose Silva-Martinez, Editor-in-Chief Andreas Demosthenous, Deputy Editor-in-Chief IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II ----------------------------------------------------------------- Title: XXXX Authors: XXXX Reviewers' and Associate Editor's Comments ========================================== Recommendation -------------- Resubmit after Minor Revision Comments to the Author ---------------------- The paper has been improved with respect to its previous version and almost all the concerns have been addressed and solved. I am suggesting a further review run in which I am asking to the authors mostly to strongly improve the English which is still far from the standard required for this journal. Key references that must be included: ------------------------------------- Review Number 1. ***************** Does the revision adequately address the concerns expressed in the original review? Yes. Comments to the Author ---------------------- The authors have certainly improved the manuscript based on the previous review. However, there are still some more formatting/grammatical errors present, and the changes have been suggested. The authors are requested to carefully proof-read their paper to be able to bring it to the level of a TCAS-II publication. Recommendations given by section for further improvement: XXXXXXXX Missing Key References: Review Number 2. ***************** Does the revision adequately address the concerns expressed in the original review? Yes. Comments to the Author ---------------------- The authors have addressed the questions. No more comment. Missing Key References: Review Number 3. ***************** Does the revision adequately address the concerns expressed in the original review? Yes. Comments to the Author ---------------------- At this revision, authors have answered all my concerns. By introducing a pulse generation tuning circuit, the work presents a XXX with enhanced XXX Although the technique behind is not very advanced, it provides an effective solution and solid measurement results. Missing Key References: Review Number 4. ***************** Comments to the Author ---------------------- Missing Key References: Review Number 5. ***************** Does the revision adequately address the concerns expressed in the original review? Partially. Comments to the Author ---------------------- Previous comments have only been partially addressed. Explanation is not very clear. It is not clear what is the novelty of the proposed approach and what are advantages/difference with repsect to prior works. Missing Key References: 以上是5为reviewer的意见，前4位基本上没有什么问题了就是论文english比较烂，最后一位我觉得有点难缠，我已经解释了，但是还是说我没有novelty！我都怀疑他是否有没有仔细读我的文章，介于结论是“resubmit after minor revision”，我还需要理他吗？ 关键是他们都说我的english烂，看了我要好好润色一下了，大家有没有比较好的有偿润色服务可以推荐一下？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
人气不行了
已经有11人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有22人回复
-
导师吐槽：我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生！
已经有3人回复
-
2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战
已经有7人回复
-
今天基金会出结果吗？20260819
已经有18人回复
-
我面上完蛋了
已经有14人回复
-
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有8人回复
-
只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫
已经有27人回复
-
明天应该可查了！？
已经有5人回复
-
如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑，不妨来听听这首《基金之外》
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 这种minor revision是不是相当于接收了，有必要再润色吗？
已经有10人回复
- Minor Revision是指小修吗，录用可能性多大？
已经有30人回复
- 投稿后，编辑回复：Minor Revision Required，是不是就是小修后会录用的意思？
已经有38人回复
- 文章minor revision,小修后提交上去了，with editor了，不知道还会不会送审？
已经有26人回复
- Minor revision 变成 under review 怎么回事啊
已经有11人回复
- 投稿short paper，返回意见却是accept as regular paper after minor revision
已经有5人回复
- minor revision 求助！
已经有11人回复
- 投稿意见求助（plos one “minor revision”）
已经有8人回复
- "Minor Revision"4次，“Awaiting EIC Decision”4周，要催促下吗？
已经有18人回复
- RSC Advances综述--minor revision
已经有32人回复
- minor revision 除了解决reviewer的问题外还需要注意什么
已经有24人回复
- 请问minor revision 和 major revision 是怎么区分的？
已经有19人回复
- minor revision，除了问题的回答外，一些套话要怎么写的，比如感谢审稿人什么.
已经有13人回复
- 求助，accept with minor revision，该怎么修改？
已经有7人回复
- 文章：Minor Revision. 修改后怎么处理？
已经有16人回复
- 大家的论文minor revision后结局都咋样啊？
已经有33人回复
- Minor Revision 投出后又出现 Editor Invited
已经有8人回复
- minor revision 修改稿再次under review, 为何？
已经有12人回复
awyatn
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 4 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 462.4
- 帖子: 172
- 在线: 44.6小时
- 虫号: 1074924
- 注册: 2010-08-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 集成电路设计与测试
6楼2014-06-14 12:13:30
伤哒心
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 853 (博后)
- 金币: 38779.2
- 红花: 32
- 帖子: 9112
- 在线: 977.4小时
- 虫号: 1333010
- 注册: 2011-06-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 集成电路设计与测试
2楼2014-04-21 14:12:39
★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
awyatn: 金币+2, ★有帮助, 文章中了，小弟金币不多，一点意思哈 2014-06-14 12:09:59
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
awyatn: 金币+2, ★有帮助, 文章中了，小弟金币不多，一点意思哈 2014-06-14 12:09:59
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
3楼2014-04-21 14:35:02
enemyatgates
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 699.8
- 散金: 441
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 488
- 在线: 176.4小时
- 虫号: 1003268
- 注册: 2010-04-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 集成电路设计与测试
4楼2014-04-21 14:49:07
awyatn
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 4 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 462.4
- 帖子: 172
- 在线: 44.6小时
- 虫号: 1074924
- 注册: 2010-08-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 集成电路设计与测试
5楼2014-04-21 16:41:10
awyatn
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 4 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 462.4
- 帖子: 172
- 在线: 44.6小时
- 虫号: 1074924
- 注册: 2010-08-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 集成电路设计与测试
小弟，之前写过半导体学报电子学报什么的英文文章，这次是第一次写真正意思上的英文论文，很是没有把握，算是摸着石头过河吧，和那些大牛没没法比啊 ，这个过程真的很漫长而无助，多谢虫友们的一些帮助，现在我冒昧的把这次投稿经历写出来，希望能帮助后面的虫友们，贻笑大方了哈。审稿进度很慢，去年10月份投的初稿，要3个月后给第一次结果，是“Reject with encouragement for resubmission (Major revision)”，一共3位评审人，给的意见很中肯。 按要求改了11月份上传，这次还是“Reject with encouragement for resubmission (Major revision)”，而且审稿专家变成5位了，很明显是另一波人，没有太多技术意见，有些感觉不是很懂整个领域，只有一位专家的问题很刁钻，说我的没有创新性。 没办法，再改，并且针对性回答专家意见；再投，1个月后，结果是“Resubmit after Minor Revision for Review”，还是上一次的5位专家，基本上已经没有技术意见，那位专家依然偏执的认为我没有创新性，同时编辑说我英文烂，要求3周内给最终稿，否则不再受理，所以很着急的修改之，并在回复中谦虚而有针对性的回答了问题。 之后，又是漫长的等等，1个月后没消息，给特指编辑发信，没用，只好给其他人员发，一位可能是审稿人说已经将意见提交，一位说很快会给意见，但是过了至少3天才在网址上给了“Accept as is”，还没给回复信，还要等。 |
7楼2014-06-14 12:36:36
enemyatgates
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 699.8
- 散金: 441
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 488
- 在线: 176.4小时
- 虫号: 1003268
- 注册: 2010-04-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 集成电路设计与测试
8楼2014-06-16 14:37:06
enemyatgates
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 699.8
- 散金: 441
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 488
- 在线: 176.4小时
- 虫号: 1003268
- 注册: 2010-04-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 集成电路设计与测试
9楼2014-06-16 14:37:20
awyatn
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 4 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 462.4
- 帖子: 172
- 在线: 44.6小时
- 虫号: 1074924
- 注册: 2010-08-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 集成电路设计与测试
10楼2014-06-26 19:31:06
20