24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

awyatn

银虫 (小有名气)

应助: 4 (幼儿园)
金币: 462.4
帖子: 172
在线: 44.6小时
虫号: 1074924
注册: 2010-08-15
性别: GG
专业: 集成电路设计与测试

[求助] TSCAS2-Resubmit after Minor Revision

resubmit了3次，现在是Resubmit after Minor Revision，都要疯掉了！一下comments

Dear XXX:

I am writing to inform you that the review process for your paper has been completed. Based on the recommendation of the Associate Editor, your paper cannot be accepted for publication in the present form.I suggest that you revise the manuscript to incorporate the reviewers' comments and/or suggestions and resubmit the revised version. In your revision, please carefully address all concerns raised by the reviewers. Please note that no second revision will be granted. If you fail to address any review comment, your manuscript will be rejected.Your revision should be submitted to the same web system within the next three weeks for further processing. Failure to do so will result in the elimination of your manuscript from the system. Please contact us if there is an emergency that prevents you from meeting the deadline.
Thank you for considering the Transactions on CAS II.
Jose Silva-Martinez, Editor-in-Chief
Andreas Demosthenous, Deputy Editor-in-Chief
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Title: XXXX
Authors: XXXX

Reviewers' and Associate Editor's Comments
==========================================
Recommendation
--------------
Resubmit after Minor Revision
Comments to the Author
----------------------
The paper has been improved with respect to its previous version and almost all the concerns have been addressed and solved. I am suggesting a further review run in which I am asking to the authors mostly to strongly improve the English which is still far from the standard required for this journal.
Key references that must be included:
-------------------------------------
Review Number 1.
*****************
Does the revision adequately address the concerns
expressed in the original review?
Yes.
Comments to the Author
----------------------
The authors have certainly improved the manuscript based on the previous review. However, there are still some more formatting/grammatical errors present, and the changes have been suggested. The authors are requested to carefully proof-read their paper to be able to bring it to the level of a TCAS-II publication.
Recommendations given by section for further improvement:
XXXXXXXX
Missing Key References:

Review Number 2.
*****************
Does the revision adequately address the concerns
expressed in the original review?
Yes.
Comments to the Author
----------------------
The authors have addressed the questions. No more comment.
Missing Key References:

Review Number 3.
*****************
Does the revision adequately address the concerns
expressed in the original review?
Yes.
Comments to the Author
----------------------
At this revision, authors have answered all my concerns. By introducing a pulse generation tuning circuit, the work presents a XXX with enhanced
XXX Although the technique behind is not very advanced, it provides an effective solution and solid measurement results.
Missing Key References:

Review Number 4.
*****************
Comments to the Author
----------------------
Missing Key References:

Review Number 5.
*****************
Does the revision adequately address the concerns
expressed in the original review?
Partially.
Comments to the Author
----------------------
Previous comments have only been partially addressed.
Explanation is not very clear.
It is not clear what is the novelty of the proposed approach and what are advantages/difference with repsect to prior works.
Missing Key References:

以上是5为reviewer的意见，前4位基本上没有什么问题了就是论文english比较烂，最后一位我觉得有点难缠，我已经解释了，但是还是说我没有novelty！我都怀疑他是否有没有仔细读我的文章，介于结论是“resubmit after minor revision”，我还需要理他吗？
关键是他们都说我的english烂，看了我要好好润色一下了，大家有没有比较好的有偿润色服务可以推荐一下？

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

真诚求助：手里的省社科项目结项要求主持人一篇中文核心，有什么渠道能发核心吗已经有8人回复
寻求一种能扛住强氧化性腐蚀性的容器密封件已经有5人回复
论文投稿，期刊推荐已经有6人回复
请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。已经有4人回复
孩子确诊有中度注意力缺陷已经有14人回复
请问下大家为什么这个铃木偶联几乎不反应呢已经有5人回复
请问有评职称，把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗已经有5人回复
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果已经有3人回复
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入已经有4人回复
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生已经有6人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

这种minor revision是不是相当于接收了，有必要再润色吗？已经有10人回复
Minor Revision是指小修吗，录用可能性多大？已经有30人回复
投稿后，编辑回复：Minor Revision Required，是不是就是小修后会录用的意思？已经有38人回复
文章minor revision,小修后提交上去了，with editor了，不知道还会不会送审？已经有26人回复
Minor revision 变成 under review 怎么回事啊已经有11人回复
投稿short paper，返回意见却是accept as regular paper after minor revision 已经有5人回复
minor revision 求助！已经有11人回复
投稿意见求助（plos one “minor revision”）已经有8人回复
"Minor Revision"4次，“Awaiting EIC Decision”4周，要催促下吗？已经有18人回复
RSC Advances综述--minor revision 已经有32人回复
minor revision 除了解决reviewer的问题外还需要注意什么已经有24人回复
请问minor revision 和 major revision 是怎么区分的？已经有19人回复
minor revision，除了问题的回答外，一些套话要怎么写的，比如感谢审稿人什么. 已经有13人回复
求助，accept with minor revision，该怎么修改？已经有7人回复
文章：Minor Revision. 修改后怎么处理？已经有16人回复
大家的论文minor revision后结局都咋样啊？已经有33人回复
Minor Revision 投出后又出现 Editor Invited 已经有8人回复
minor revision 修改稿再次under review, 为何？已经有12人回复

用行动的光芒，驱逐心里的雾霾！！

1楼2014-04-21 14:03:12

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

awyatn

银虫 (小有名气)

应助: 4 (幼儿园)
金币: 462.4
帖子: 172
在线: 44.6小时
虫号: 1074924
注册: 2010-08-15
性别: GG
专业: 集成电路设计与测试

小弟，之前写过半导体学报电子学报什么的英文文章，这次是第一次写真正意思上的英文论文，很是没有把握，算是摸着石头过河吧，和那些大牛没没法比啊

，这个过程真的很漫长而无助，多谢虫友们的一些帮助，现在我冒昧的把这次投稿经历写出来，希望能帮助后面的虫友们，贻笑大方了哈。
审稿进度很慢，去年10月份投的初稿，要3个月后给第一次结果，是“Reject with encouragement for resubmission (Major revision)”，一共3位评审人，给的意见很中肯。
按要求改了11月份上传，这次还是“Reject with encouragement for resubmission (Major revision)”，而且审稿专家变成5位了，很明显是另一波人，没有太多技术意见，有些感觉不是很懂整个领域，只有一位专家的问题很刁钻，说我的没有创新性。
没办法，再改，并且针对性回答专家意见；再投，1个月后，结果是“Resubmit after Minor Revision for Review”，还是上一次的5位专家，基本上已经没有技术意见，那位专家依然偏执的认为我没有创新性，同时编辑说我英文烂，要求3周内给最终稿，否则不再受理，所以很着急的修改之，并在回复中谦虚而有针对性的回答了问题。
之后，又是漫长的等等，1个月后没消息，给特指编辑发信，没用，只好给其他人员发，一位可能是审稿人说已经将意见提交，一位说很快会给意见，但是过了至少3天才在网址上给了“Accept as is”，还没给回复信，还要等。