| 查看: 3181 | 回复: 11 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
awyatn银虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
TSCAS2-Resubmit after Minor Revision
|
|
|
resubmit了3次，现在是Resubmit after Minor Revision，都要疯掉了！一下comments Dear XXX: I am writing to inform you that the review process for your paper has been completed. Based on the recommendation of the Associate Editor, your paper cannot be accepted for publication in the present form.I suggest that you revise the manuscript to incorporate the reviewers' comments and/or suggestions and resubmit the revised version. In your revision, please carefully address all concerns raised by the reviewers. Please note that no second revision will be granted. If you fail to address any review comment, your manuscript will be rejected.Your revision should be submitted to the same web system within the next three weeks for further processing. Failure to do so will result in the elimination of your manuscript from the system. Please contact us if there is an emergency that prevents you from meeting the deadline. Thank you for considering the Transactions on CAS II. Jose Silva-Martinez, Editor-in-Chief Andreas Demosthenous, Deputy Editor-in-Chief IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II ----------------------------------------------------------------- Title: XXXX Authors: XXXX Reviewers' and Associate Editor's Comments ========================================== Recommendation -------------- Resubmit after Minor Revision Comments to the Author ---------------------- The paper has been improved with respect to its previous version and almost all the concerns have been addressed and solved. I am suggesting a further review run in which I am asking to the authors mostly to strongly improve the English which is still far from the standard required for this journal. Key references that must be included: ------------------------------------- Review Number 1. ***************** Does the revision adequately address the concerns expressed in the original review? Yes. Comments to the Author ---------------------- The authors have certainly improved the manuscript based on the previous review. However, there are still some more formatting/grammatical errors present, and the changes have been suggested. The authors are requested to carefully proof-read their paper to be able to bring it to the level of a TCAS-II publication. Recommendations given by section for further improvement: XXXXXXXX Missing Key References: Review Number 2. ***************** Does the revision adequately address the concerns expressed in the original review? Yes. Comments to the Author ---------------------- The authors have addressed the questions. No more comment. Missing Key References: Review Number 3. ***************** Does the revision adequately address the concerns expressed in the original review? Yes. Comments to the Author ---------------------- At this revision, authors have answered all my concerns. By introducing a pulse generation tuning circuit, the work presents a XXX with enhanced XXX Although the technique behind is not very advanced, it provides an effective solution and solid measurement results. Missing Key References: Review Number 4. ***************** Comments to the Author ---------------------- Missing Key References: Review Number 5. ***************** Does the revision adequately address the concerns expressed in the original review? Partially. Comments to the Author ---------------------- Previous comments have only been partially addressed. Explanation is not very clear. It is not clear what is the novelty of the proposed approach and what are advantages/difference with repsect to prior works. Missing Key References: 以上是5为reviewer的意见，前4位基本上没有什么问题了就是论文english比较烂，最后一位我觉得有点难缠，我已经解释了，但是还是说我没有novelty！我都怀疑他是否有没有仔细读我的文章，介于结论是“resubmit after minor revision”，我还需要理他吗？ 关键是他们都说我的english烂，看了我要好好润色一下了，大家有没有比较好的有偿润色服务可以推荐一下？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有19人回复
-
澳大利亚 Murdoch University 全奖博士招生（3个名额）地质化工冶金领域
已经有26人回复
-
阿姨
已经有4人回复
-
一作与独作在应聘高校教师时区别大吗
已经有4人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有9人回复
-
静等基金结果
已经有21人回复
-
FileCode能看出啥？
已经有28人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有6人回复
-
filecode
已经有16人回复
-
重要来源：本周末出结果
已经有10人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 这种minor revision是不是相当于接收了，有必要再润色吗？
已经有10人回复
- Minor Revision是指小修吗，录用可能性多大？
已经有30人回复
- 投稿后，编辑回复：Minor Revision Required，是不是就是小修后会录用的意思？
已经有38人回复
- 文章minor revision,小修后提交上去了，with editor了，不知道还会不会送审？
已经有26人回复
- Minor revision 变成 under review 怎么回事啊
已经有11人回复
- 投稿short paper，返回意见却是accept as regular paper after minor revision
已经有5人回复
- minor revision 求助！
已经有11人回复
- 投稿意见求助（plos one “minor revision”）
已经有8人回复
- "Minor Revision"4次，“Awaiting EIC Decision”4周，要催促下吗？
已经有18人回复
- RSC Advances综述--minor revision
已经有32人回复
- minor revision 除了解决reviewer的问题外还需要注意什么
已经有24人回复
- 请问minor revision 和 major revision 是怎么区分的？
已经有19人回复
- minor revision，除了问题的回答外，一些套话要怎么写的，比如感谢审稿人什么.
已经有13人回复
- 求助，accept with minor revision，该怎么修改？
已经有7人回复
- 文章：Minor Revision. 修改后怎么处理？
已经有16人回复
- 大家的论文minor revision后结局都咋样啊？
已经有33人回复
- Minor Revision 投出后又出现 Editor Invited
已经有8人回复
- minor revision 修改稿再次under review, 为何？
已经有12人回复
enemyatgates
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 699.8
- 散金: 441
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 488
- 在线: 176.4小时
- 虫号: 1003268
- 注册: 2010-04-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 集成电路设计与测试
4楼2014-04-21 14:49:07
伤哒心
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 853 (博后)
- 金币: 38695.2
- 红花: 32
- 帖子: 9100
- 在线: 977.4小时
- 虫号: 1333010
- 注册: 2011-06-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 集成电路设计与测试
2楼2014-04-21 14:12:39
★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
awyatn: 金币+2, ★有帮助, 文章中了，小弟金币不多，一点意思哈 2014-06-14 12:09:59
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
awyatn: 金币+2, ★有帮助, 文章中了，小弟金币不多，一点意思哈 2014-06-14 12:09:59
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
3楼2014-04-21 14:35:02
awyatn
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 4 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 462.4
- 帖子: 172
- 在线: 44.6小时
- 虫号: 1074924
- 注册: 2010-08-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 集成电路设计与测试
5楼2014-04-21 16:41:10
