| ²é¿´: 4092 | »Ø¸´: 7 | |||||
manners½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÇóÖú£ºresponse to comments£¬ÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Ö÷±àµÄÌ×»° ÒÑÓÐ3È˲ÎÓë
|
|
µÚÒ»´ÎͶÍ⿯£¬ÏÖÔÚÈçÏÂÎÊÌâÇë½Ì£ºÔڱ༸øÎÒµÄÐÞ¸Ä֪ͨÀ¿ªÍ·ÓÐÒ»¶Î¹ØÓÚÍâÉóÇé¿ö£¬ÈçºÎÌá½»Ð޸ĸ壬ͼƬÊý¾ÝµÈÒýÓðæÈ¨ÎÊÌâµÈһЩÌ×»°£¬Âä¿îÊÇÖ÷±à¡£ÄÇôÔÚÎÒÐ޻صÄresponse to reviewerÀ»¹Òª¶ÔÕâ¶Î»°»Ø¸´Âð£¿ÎÒµÄͶ¸åϵͳÊôÓÚÍøÉϻظ´response to reviewer£¬²»ÓÃרÃÅд¶ÀÁ¢µÄwordÎļþ¡£ÄÄλ´óÉñÓÐÕâ¶Î»°µÄ»Ø¸´Ä£°åÄØ£¿ ÇëÖ¸µã£¬Íò·Ö¸Ðл£¡£¡ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ûÓÐÈκÎÏûÏ¢-ÊDz»ÊǾÍÁ¹ÁË
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCI-T0PÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8O.5.5.1.O.54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8.O.551.O.5.4,¿ÆÄ¿È«,¿ÉÙ¤¼±
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÈËÆø²»ÐÐÁË
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
Èç¹û´Ë¿ÌÄãÕýÔÚΪ¹ú»ù¸Ðµ½½¹ÂÇ£¬²»·ÁÀ´ÌýÌýÕâÊס¶»ù½ðÖ®Íâ¡·
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÎÒÃæÉÏÍêµ°ÁË
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
ÄÜ·ñÍ˳ö²ÎÓëµÄÃæÉÏÏîÄ¿½â³ýÏÞÏî
ÒѾÓÐ24È˻ظ´
filecode£¬4¸öjtjcÁË
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
2026¹ú×ÔÈ»º¯ÆÀ·Ñµ½ÕË
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
½¨Òé»ù½ð·¢²¼Ìáǰ¸ø³öÃ÷È·µÄʱ¼äµã
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
ÕâÊDZ༸øÎҵĻØÐÅ£¿ÕâÊÇʲô½Ú×ࣿ
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
Physical Review EͶ¸åÇóÖú¡£¡£¡£
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
IEEE TRANSÉó¸åÈ˵ÄcommentsÔõôresponse£¿
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ÇóÖúһƪResponse to comments and Decision LetterµÄ»ØÐÅÄ£°å...
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
¼±Ç󣡣¡Á½´ÎһģһÑùµÄdecision letter£¬Ê²Ã´Çé¿ö£¿
ÒѾÓÐ27È˻ظ´
Ó¢ÎÄд×÷Ð޸ĵÄresponseÔõôд£¿
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÂÛÎÄ·µÐÞ£¬ÓÐÉó¸åÈ˸ø¾Ü¸åÒâ¼û£¬ÔÚresponse to comments µÄ»Ø¸´ÎÊÌ⣡~~
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
¹ØÓÚchemical communications Ôõô´óÐ޵öÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
¾Ý¸åÔÙͶ¼°cover letterÔõôд
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´£¬±à¼ÕâÑùµÄ»Ø¸´ÎÄÕ»¹ÓÐÏ·Âð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
ÆÀÉóÕßͬÒâ½ÓÊÜÁË£¬µ«±à¼ÒªÇó°´Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼ûminor revisions£¬Ôõô¸Ä£¿
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
ÂÛÎÄ´óÐÞ,Çó´ð¸´ÐÅÄ£°å¡£
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Comments to editor Ôõô»Ø¸´£¿
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
¼±ÇóACSÉÏ´«Ð޸ĸå
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
Crystal Growth & DesignСÐ޺󱻾ܣ¬´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ·ÖÎöÒ»ÏÂÔõô»ØÊÂ?
ÒѾÓÐ63È˻ظ´
ÈçºÎд response to review comments
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
°ï濴һϱà¼ÊÇʲôÒâ˼£¨Materials Research Bulletin£©
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
¹ØÓÚResponse to Reviewers¡¯ Comments£¬Çó½Ì£¡£¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ31È˻ظ´
Çó´ð¸´Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÄ£°å
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
Ôõôд*Revision Notes
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÇóÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼ûµÄ»Ø¸´µÄÄ£°å
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ÇóÖúÐ޸ĸåµÄcover letterÔõôд£¿
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
feixiaolin
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +518 - Ó¦Öú: 942 (²©ºó)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.275
- ½ð±Ò: 3881
- É¢½ð: 58785
- ºì»¨: 532
- ɳ·¢: 11
- Ìû×Ó: 24215
- ÔÚÏß: 2601.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2139575
- ×¢²á: 2012-11-21
- רҵ: ¹âѧÐÅÏ¢»ñÈ¡Óë´¦Àí
- ¹ÜϽ: Êýѧ
|
Dear Mr/ Mrs ¡¡ Thanks you for your email. ¸ÐлÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û£¬ÒÔÏÂÊǶÔÉó¸åÒâ¼ûµÄÖðÌõ´ð¸´ Q1: ¡¡ A1: ¡¡ Q2: ¡¡ A2: ¡¡ ×£¸£Óï your name date |
2Â¥2014-02-15 23:02:36
feixiaolin
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +518 - Ó¦Öú: 942 (²©ºó)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.275
- ½ð±Ò: 3881
- É¢½ð: 58785
- ºì»¨: 532
- ɳ·¢: 11
- Ìû×Ó: 24215
- ÔÚÏß: 2601.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2139575
- ×¢²á: 2012-11-21
- רҵ: ¹âѧÐÅÏ¢»ñÈ¡Óë´¦Àí
- ¹ÜϽ: Êýѧ
3Â¥2014-02-15 23:05:36
manners
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1468.8
- É¢½ð: 1534
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 750
- ÔÚÏß: 373.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1066522
- ×¢²á: 2010-07-30
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¿ØÖÆÀíÂÛÓë·½·¨
4Â¥2014-02-15 23:30:54
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
manners: ½ð±Ò+5, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2014-02-16 00:19:37
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
manners: ½ð±Ò+5, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2014-02-16 00:19:37
|
±¾ÌûÄÚÈݱ»ÆÁ±Î |
5Â¥2014-02-15 23:53:46
manners
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1468.8
- É¢½ð: 1534
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 750
- ÔÚÏß: 373.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1066522
- ×¢²á: 2010-07-30
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¿ØÖÆÀíÂÛÓë·½·¨
6Â¥2014-02-16 00:20:34
sigma
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 694 (²©Ê¿)
- ½ð±Ò: 5538.8
- É¢½ð: 50
- ºì»¨: 43
- Ìû×Ó: 2154
- ÔÚÏß: 208.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 165203
- ×¢²á: 2006-01-12
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹âѧ
7Â¥2014-02-16 01:41:06
ifensi87
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 17 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1150
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 112
- ÔÚÏß: 54.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2942305
- ×¢²á: 2014-01-21
- רҵ: ¿ØÖÆÀíÂÛÓë·½·¨
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
manners: ½ð±Ò+3, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2014-02-17 08:44:05
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
manners: ½ð±Ò+3, ¡ï¡ï¡ïºÜÓаïÖú 2014-02-17 08:44:05
|
ÎÒÒ»°ãµÄÌ×·£º Response Title: Responses to Chief Editor¡¯s, Associate Editor¡¯s and Reviewers¡¯ Comments on the Paper Entitled "****" (Manuscript Number: ****) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The authors would like to thank Chief Editor, Professor/Doctor **, Associate Editor and anonymous Reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Response to Chief Editor, Professor/Doctor ** and Associate Editor: 1. As per your suggestion, we have revised the paper by (1) (2) ... (n) 2. We have carefully addressed all the Reviewers¡¯ comments point by point. Response to Reviewer #1: Reviewer #1's comments: "*************************" Response: дÉÏÄãÕë¶ÔReviewer #1 µÄµÚÒ»ÌõcommentµÄ»Ø¸´¡£ÒÔºóÿÌõcommentÖðÌõ»Ø¸´¡£ÕâÑùÏÔµÃÄãÖØÊÓÈË¼Ò ![]() ×îºó£º We thank again to both Chief Editor, Associate Editor, and anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful and thorough review. |

8Â¥2014-02-17 07:00:38









»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

20