|
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 感谢参与,应助指数 +1 蜀地越人: 金币+15, ★★★很有帮助, 谢谢! 2013-02-03 20:53:42 蜀地越人: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助, 文章接受,继续散币 2013-03-01 09:24:37
1、大修该怎么修,直接在文章中改好,到时候上传新稿吗,还是把每处改动写到单独一个文件上传?对于改动要不要说明原因。
根据编辑的要求,直接在文章中使用修订模式改好,或者修改后,使用高亮标注修改的地方,改动之处不需要说明原因。
2、回复审稿人 and/or 编辑有没有什么模板,能否提供一些典型的例子和套话。
List of Responses
Dear Editor and Reviewers:
Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:
Responds to the reviewer’s comments:
Reviewer #1:
1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)
Response: ××××××
2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)
Response: ××××××
。。。。。。
逐条意见回答,切忌一定不能有遗漏
针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用:
We are very sorry for our negligence of ……...
We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...
It is really true as Reviewer suggested that……
We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments.
We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestion
As Reviewer suggested that……
Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ……
最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见:
Special thanks to you for your good comments.
Reviewer #2:
同上述
Reviewer #3:
××××××
Other changes:
1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………”
2. Line 107, “……” was added
3. Line 129, “……” was deleted
××××××
We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.
We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.
Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.
3、文章改动牵一发而动全身,尤其三个审稿人都要我加东西的,所以可能要对全文语句进一步简化。另外此次阅读感觉以前写得还是不完美,又有改的冲动。总之,很可能对审稿人问题外的部分进行修改,不知道这样做明不明智。
完全可以
4、第三个审稿人要我补的一组数据,我们目前没设备做不了,而且快过年了别的地方也放假了,不知道该怎么办,如果拖到年后的话会不会当新稿。或者能不能请求延长修改时间(请有经验的虫子解答)。
需要补充实验,修改时间不够的话,可以给责编写信,申请延期返回修改稿。
5、第三个审稿人要我补的另一组数据,我以前做过,但是很难重复,现象也没法解释,如果加上的话整个文章太复杂了,会引出文章主题外的问题。该怎么来应对这类无法重复、无法解释,但又点名要的数据呢?
貌似可以给出几个可能的原因。 |
|