|
|
[求助]
求助,如何回复审稿人的意见(关于催化传质阻力)
What is plotted in Fig 1 is conversion not rate. In the absence of more detailed analysis it is necessary to qualify carefully the sentence about a possible contribution from mass transfer.
In Fig 2 conversion is plotted against catalyst mass. So again in the absence of more detailed analysis (ie of rate vs catalyst mass) the authors need to be more careful in drawing a conclusion about whether there is a contribution from mass transfer, and qualify the proposed sentence.
如何回复审稿人意见?非常感谢!
![求助,如何回复审稿人的意见(关于催化传质阻力)]()
图1.jpg
![求助,如何回复审稿人的意见(关于催化传质阻力)-1]()
图 2.jpg |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有7人回复
售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有11人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有9人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有6人回复
售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有7人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有7人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有9人回复
|