| 查看: 1161 | 回复: 3 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
帮忙分析下审稿意见
|
||
|
两个月之前投了一篇文章到IET Image Processing，今天回了审稿意见，一共有三个审稿人，请帮忙分析下。 第一个审稿人提出的格式上的错误，并要求提高英文写作水平； 第二个审稿人意见如下： The paper is on a vital topic. For increase in value of the paper statement the improvement of an illustrative material is required. On fig. 3 and 8 the system of vehicle co-ordinates is unsuccessfully shown. In other drawings basically are shown (small and is badly distinguishable) separate steps of algorithms, with reference to separate image. At the same time, the important question discussed in the paper, tracking of multistrip road is. To illustrate possibilities of described algorithms, it is necessary to show change of results at transition from one image to another in the course of vehicle movement. It is thus important to specify vehicle speed. Other actual problem mentioned in the paper, association of LIDAR and mono-videocameras data is. From the point of view of practical application here it is necessary to give more attention to the description of corresponding points finding in the course of such system calibration. Whether corresponding points defined manual? With what accuracy? What resultant accuracy turns out at combination of real images and LIDAR data? 第三个审稿人意见： Comments to the Author contribution: Free space segmentation based on LIDAR, Initializing tracking without knowing the ego-motion information. A global evaluation of the performance of the algorithm is obtained on real driving situation in urban scenarios (by using manually ground-true). It will be interesting to evaluate (independently , not Globally ) the behavior of the proposed method with respect to several conditions as : discontinuous lane markings, illumination changes, and shallows or occlusions. Is it possible to evaluate with the experiments , the benefit of the combination of the two source of information ( lidar and image)? 哪位大神能够分析下第二个审稿人的意见，感觉有好多句子都读不懂，还有像这样的审稿意见大修再返能有多大的机会中？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
北京211副教授，35岁，想重新出发，去国外做博后，怎么样？
已经有3人回复
-
自荐读博
已经有3人回复
-
求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？
已经有5人回复
-
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有22人回复
-
不自信的我
已经有5人回复
-
磺酰氟产物，毕不了业了！
已经有4人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- SCI大修，大家帮忙分析一下审稿意见，并散金100希望好运
已经有142人回复
- 大家帮忙分析下这个审稿意见
已经有4人回复
- 请帮忙分析下面的审稿意见
已经有5人回复
- 二修后审稿意见返回，还是看不太懂，请虫友帮忙分析。
已经有11人回复
- 生物类的请帮忙看下审稿意见，急！！
已经有21人回复
- 《电子与信息学报》两个审稿意见返回，大家帮忙分析一下可能的结果吧！
已经有10人回复
- 电子与信息学报悲剧了，围观下责编意见
已经有19人回复
- 高人帮忙理解下审稿意见中一个句子的意思
已经有6人回复
- 求高人帮忙分析下APL审稿意见
已经有7人回复
- SCI审稿意见回来了，编辑给的moderate revision，麻烦大家帮分析一下，有BB
已经有28人回复
- 审稿意见回来了，大家帮忙分析一下，有些意见看不懂？
已经有14人回复
- 请大家帮忙分析下这句审稿意见是什么意思
已经有4人回复
- 专家审稿意见，请大家帮忙分析！
已经有5人回复
- 审稿意见回来了，大家帮忙分析一下，还有希望吗？
已经有23人回复
- ImechE Power and Energy 第二次大修，请大家帮忙分析一下怎么回复审稿人
已经有10人回复
- 帮忙看下审稿意见
已经有6人回复
- 求助：请虫友帮忙分析下审稿意见
已经有5人回复
- 大家帮我分析一下material and design的审稿意见，录用几率大不？
已经有24人回复
- 【求助】请求大家帮忙看一下审稿人的回复
已经有6人回复
- 帮忙分析审稿意见
已经有4人回复
- 请大家帮忙看看如何回复审稿意见
已经有4人回复
- 帮忙分析一下这个审稿意见如何？先谢谢各位
已经有9人回复
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
wentis: 金币+3, ★有帮助 2013-07-20 21:28:16
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
wentis: 金币+3, ★有帮助 2013-07-20 21:28:16
|
虽然不是一个领域，但大致能看出第二个审稿人明显让你补充内容： 1、 it is necessary to show change of results at transition from one image to another in the course of vehicle movement. 2、it is necessary to give more attention to the description of corresponding points finding in the course of such system calibration. （包括：Whether corresponding points defined manual? With what accuracy? What resultant accuracy turns out at combination of real images and LIDAR data?） 只要按照审稿人的要求改，一般能中吧。祝你好运！ |
2楼2013-07-19 22:47:07