| ²é¿´: 606 | »Ø¸´: 1 | |||
angel19860820Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
ABÉó¸åÒâ¼û»Ø¸´
|
|
analytical biochemistryÒòΪ×öµÄÌ«Âý£¬Ö»ÄÜͶ¸ö²îÒ»µãµÄÔÓÖ¾£¬1Ôµ×Ͷ£¬½ñÌì»Ø¸´revise¡£Òâ¼ûÈçÏ Dear **, Your manuscript has been reviewed by individuals knowledgeable in this field. Although the reviewers were interested in the paper, questions were raised that are summarized in the reviewers' comments below. Should you agree to revise the manuscript, please indicate the changes that have been made, and point-by-point responses to the reviewers' comments. In order to retain the original date of submission, a revised manuscript should be forwarded within two months of the date of this decision letter. Please submit your revision online by logging on to the Analytical Biochemistry Elsevier Editorial System: http://ees.elsevier.com/yabio/ Your username is: ****** If you need to retrieve password details, please go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/yabio/automail_query.asp Your manuscript record is located in the "Submissions Needing Revision" menu. When submitting your revised paper, please include a separate document called "Response to Reviews" detailing your responses to the comments of the reviewers. Most useful would be a copy in which the revisions are indicated directly on the manuscript, e.g. underlined or in color. Also include electronic source files for the text and figures that can be used for publication should the manuscript be accepted. These files should include the text, tables and figure legend in an editable format (MS Word preferred) and all figures saved individually as TIF or EPS files. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This manuscript reports **. The concept is worthy of investigation and some important experimental data has been provided on the operational performance of the sensor, including signal response and selectivity. However, there are significant problems with the authors' interpretation of some of the sensitivity and selectivity data and with a lack of clarity in some of their descriptions and conclusions. Specific points for the authors to address are detailed below. 5. Page 8 line 21 ". . . the height (27 +/- 2 nm) . . ." Over what surface area or over how many "islands" was this figure calculated? How indicative is it of the broader surface morphology over large areas? 7. Page 10 line 9 ". . . detection limit . . . 4 nM." This quoted detection limit is meaningless as you have not demonstrated actual detection of adenosine at anywhere near this concentration (your lowest non-blank standard is 200 nM). Based on the error in your blank point in Figure 3, three times its standard deviation would give a limit of detection of about 100-150 nM. Furthermore, this 4 nM figure does not agree with the 65 nM quoted in the abstract. Reviewer #2: 4) Looking at Figure 3, it seems difficult to see how the limit of detection could be 4 nM. Especially since it seems that the lowest concentration tested looks to be about 200 nM. Perhaps the authors could show an inset to the figure with concentrations up to only 100 nM. ÆäËûÎʵÄÎÊÌâ¶¼ÊÇÒ§ÎĽÀ×ÖµÄСÎÊÌ⣬¾ÍÕ⼸¸öÎÊÌâ±È½Ï´ó£¬²»ºÃ»Ø´ð£¬¹ØÓÚÕâ¸ö¼ì²âÏߣ¬ÎÒÊǵ±Ê±·¢ÏÖ×Ô¼ºËã´íÁË£¬ÖØÐÂËã¹ý½á¹ûÓÐЩµØ·½Ã»ÓиĹýÀ´£¬Õâ¸öÔڻظ´µÄʱºò¿ÉÒÔÖ±½ÓÕâÑù˵ô£¬»¹ÊÇÓÐÆäËû±È½ÏÈÝÒ×ÈÃÉó¸åÈ˽ÓÊܵÄ˵·¨¡£ËûÃÇ˵µÄÊǶԵģ¬ÊÇÎÒµ±Ê±Ã»ÓиãºÃ ¹ØÓÚÓÃAFM¹Û²ì±íÃæÐÎòµÄ£¬ËûÎʵÄÓ¦¸ÃÊÇ˵ÎÒ¿´µÄÖ»ÊÇÒ»¸öƬ×ÓµÄһС²¿·Ö£¬²»ÄÜ´ú±íÕû¸öƬ×ÓµÄÇé¿ö£¬ÎÒÊDz»ÊÇÒªÓÃÈí¼þ¼ÆËã³öÕû¸öƬ×ÓÉÏÐÞÊÎÎïµÄÁ¿ÊǶàÉٲſÉÒÔ˵Ã÷Õâ¸öÎÊÌ⣿ лл |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
×Ü·Ö293Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ÉúÎï¼¼ÊõÓ빤³Ì
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
299Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏѧ˶£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
284Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
292Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
287Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
086003ʳƷ¹¤³ÌÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
295Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
¿¼Ñл¯Ñ§308·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
sciÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Éó¸åÒâ¼û£¬ÓÈÆäÊǸĸñʽµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¿
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Ó¢ÎÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û²»ÖªÈçºÎ»Ø¸´£¬ÇóÖú£¡¼±
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼û»Ø¸´--Óйزο¼ÎÄÏ×µÄÌí¼Ó
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
ÈçºÎ»Ø¸´nanotecnologyµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬Ö»ÊÕµ½ÁËÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬Ã»ÓÐpdf°æ±¾µÄÎÄÕ¶ÔÕÕ
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
¹ØÓÚÐÂÓ±ÐÔµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û¸ÃÔõÑù»Ø¸´
ÒѾÓÐ25È˻ظ´
ÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
¹ØÓڻظ´Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼û£¡wiley Journal of Separation Science
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
ͶSCIÍ⿯£¬ÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Éó¸åÒâ¼û£¬Ð»Ð»£¡£¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÒâ¼ûÈçºÎ»Ø¸´£¬ÇóÖú
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
±»¾Üºó£¬»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼ûÈçºÎͶ³ö
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ÕâÖÖÉó¸åÒâ¼ûÊÇʲôÒâ˼°¡£¿Ôõô»Ø¸´ºÃŶ
ÒѾÓÐ41È˻ظ´
Ôõô»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
Ôõô»Ø¸´ÖÐÎÄÆÚ¿¯µÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬ÓÐûÓÐÄ£°å°¡£¿
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈËÌá³öµÄÒâ¼û£¨Óï·¨´íÎ󣩣¿
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÂÛÎÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û»ØÀ´ÁË£¬´ó¼Ò¿´¿´ÈçºÎ»Ø¸´°¡
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÒâ¼û»Ø¸´£¨¸ñʽ·½ÃæµÄ£©£¬ººÓï´ó¸ÅÒâ˼ÒѾд³öÀ´£¬Çó·Òë
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÒâ¼ûÔõô»Ø¸´
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Ò»Ìì ¾Í»Ø¸´Éó¸åÒâ¼û »á²»»á²ÙÖ®¹ý¼±£¿
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
Çó¼ÆËãÎïÀí·½Ãæ ¶ÔÓÚÉó¸åÈËÒâ¼ûµÄ»Ø¸´Ä£°å£¬
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
¶ÔÉó¸åÒâ¼ûµÄ»Ø¸´
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÒâ¼û»Ø¸´¹ý³ÌÖÐÓëÀϰåµÄÒâ¼ûÓÐ·ÖÆç£¬ÈçºÎ´¦Àí£¿·³Çë¸ßÈËÖ¸µã£¡
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´ÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Éó¸åÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÒâ¼û»Ø¸´Çë½Ì
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÈËÒâ¼ûÈçºÎ»Ø¸´£¿
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
» ÇÀ½ð±ÒÀ²£¡»ØÌû¾Í¿ÉÒԵõ½:
»ù½ðÆí¸£
+3/1712
Öйú¿ÆÑ§Ôºº¼ÖÝҽѧÑо¿-³£ð©Ñо¿Ô±¿ÎÌâ×鲩ʿºóÕÐÆ¸
+1/276
Ïã¸ÛÖÐÎÄ´óѧ£¨ÉîÛÚ£©½ùÓ𻪽ÌÊÚ½»²æÊµÑéÊÒÕÐļ2026Äê²ÄÁÏѧ²©Ê¿Éú£¨¹âÖ±äÉ«£©
+2/134
ÕÐÊÕµ÷¼ÁÉú£¬¶¯Îïҽѧרҵ
+1/84
ÉòÑôũҵ´óѧÉúÎïÓëҽҩר˶ÕÐÊÕµ÷¼ÁÉú£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡
+1/45
ÕÐÊÕ²ÄÁÏÏà¹ØË¶Ê¿Ñо¿Éú
+2/44
PBATÈܽâ×ö³ÉÈéÒº
+1/36
ÏÂÖܼûÒ»¸öºÏ×÷Õߣ¬Ó¦¸ÃÎÊЩʲô
+1/16
°ÄÃÅÀí¹¤´óѧ2026È˹¤ÖÇÄÜÒ©Îï·¢ÏÖ²©Ê¿£¨½±Ñ§½ð+ÉêÇ뿼ºË£©
+1/15
---´óÁäµÄδ»éÄÐÕÒ½á»éÅ®¶ÔÏó
+1/14
ÖÐÄÏ´óѧÓ÷¹ðÅó½ÌÊÚÍŶÓÐÂÔö2026Ä격ʿÑо¿Éú
+1/12
Ìì½ò¹¤Òµ´óѧ˫һÁ÷¸ßУÕв©Ê¿¡¢Ë¶Ê¿¡¢²©Ê¿ºó
+1/4
¡¾²©Ê¿ÕÐÉú¡¿Ìì½òÀí¹¤´óѧ¹ú¼Ò½ÜÇàÍõÌú¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ2026Ä격ʿÑо¿Éú
+1/4
ÉϺ£½»Í¨´óѧ»¯Ñ§»¯¹¤Ñ§ÔºÕÅÖÇÌοÎÌâ×é³ÏƸ²©Ê¿ºó
+1/3
Ìì½ò´óѧÕã½Ñо¿Ôº£¨Äþ²¨£©³ÏƸ¸ß·Ö×Ó/»¯Ñ§/²ÄÁÏ·½Ïò²©Ê¿ºó¡¢ÇàÄêÌØÆ¸Ñо¿Ô±
+1/3
ÉϺ£Ê¦·¶´óѧÓлú»¯Ñ§×¨ÒµÑо¿ÉúÕÐÉú
+1/3
ÖйúÈËÃñ´óѧÎïÀíѧϵ²ÌÅô¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕÓÅÐã˶ʿ²©Ê¿Ñо¿Éú
+1/2
Ìì½ò´óѧÀíѧԺ·ÖÀë·ÖÎö¼°¹¦ÄܲÄÁÏÑо¿×éÕÐÊÕ˶ʿÑо¿Éú
+1/2
Î人·ÄÖ¯´óѧ·ÄÖ¯ÏËά¼°ÖÆÆ·½ÌÓý²¿ÖصãʵÑéÊÒÕÐÊÕ²©Ê¿Ñо¿Éú
+1/1
ÐËÖ¤»úе¾ü¹¤¡¿Éç»áÕÐÆ¸¼°ÊµÏ°ÉúÕÐÆ¸ÆôÊÂ
+1/1
angel19860820
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 5 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 14765.8
- Ìû×Ó: 2444
- ÔÚÏß: 589.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 523759
2Â¥2013-02-26 21:24:12













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥