| 查看: 605 | 回复: 1 | |||
[交流]
AB审稿意见回复
|
|
analytical biochemistry因为做的太慢，只能投个差一点的杂志，1月底投，今天回复revise。意见如下 Dear **, Your manuscript has been reviewed by individuals knowledgeable in this field. Although the reviewers were interested in the paper, questions were raised that are summarized in the reviewers' comments below. Should you agree to revise the manuscript, please indicate the changes that have been made, and point-by-point responses to the reviewers' comments. In order to retain the original date of submission, a revised manuscript should be forwarded within two months of the date of this decision letter. Please submit your revision online by logging on to the Analytical Biochemistry Elsevier Editorial System: http://ees.elsevier.com/yabio/ Your username is: ****** If you need to retrieve password details, please go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/yabio/automail_query.asp Your manuscript record is located in the "Submissions Needing Revision" menu. When submitting your revised paper, please include a separate document called "Response to Reviews" detailing your responses to the comments of the reviewers. Most useful would be a copy in which the revisions are indicated directly on the manuscript, e.g. underlined or in color. Also include electronic source files for the text and figures that can be used for publication should the manuscript be accepted. These files should include the text, tables and figure legend in an editable format (MS Word preferred) and all figures saved individually as TIF or EPS files. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This manuscript reports **. The concept is worthy of investigation and some important experimental data has been provided on the operational performance of the sensor, including signal response and selectivity. However, there are significant problems with the authors' interpretation of some of the sensitivity and selectivity data and with a lack of clarity in some of their descriptions and conclusions. Specific points for the authors to address are detailed below. 5. Page 8 line 21 ". . . the height (27 +/- 2 nm) . . ." Over what surface area or over how many "islands" was this figure calculated? How indicative is it of the broader surface morphology over large areas? 7. Page 10 line 9 ". . . detection limit . . . 4 nM." This quoted detection limit is meaningless as you have not demonstrated actual detection of adenosine at anywhere near this concentration (your lowest non-blank standard is 200 nM). Based on the error in your blank point in Figure 3, three times its standard deviation would give a limit of detection of about 100-150 nM. Furthermore, this 4 nM figure does not agree with the 65 nM quoted in the abstract. Reviewer #2: 4) Looking at Figure 3, it seems difficult to see how the limit of detection could be 4 nM. Especially since it seems that the lowest concentration tested looks to be about 200 nM. Perhaps the authors could show an inset to the figure with concentrations up to only 100 nM. 其他问的问题都是咬文嚼字的小问题，就这几个问题比较大，不好回答，关于这个检测线，我是当时发现自己算错了，重新算过结果有些地方没有改过来，这个在回复的时候可以直接这样说么，还是有其他比较容易让审稿人接受的说法。他们说的是对的，是我当时没有搞好 关于用AFM观察表面形貌的，他问的应该是说我看的只是一个片子的一小部分，不能代表整个片子的情况，我是不是要用软件计算出整个片子上修饰物的量是多少才可以说明这个问题？ 谢谢 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
289材料与化工（085600）B区求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
B区考研调剂
已经有4人回复
-
284求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
0854电子信息求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
292求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
340求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
生物学学硕求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
上海电力大学材料防护与新材料重点实验室招收调剂研究生（材料、化学、电化学，环境）
已经有4人回复
-
材料学求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
303求调剂
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- sci如何回复审稿意见，尤其是改格式的审稿意见？
已经有8人回复
- 英文审稿意见不知如何回复，求助！急
已经有6人回复
- 审稿人意见回复--有关参考文献的添加
已经有11人回复
- 如何回复nanotecnology的审稿意见，只收到了审稿意见，没有pdf版本的文章对照
已经有13人回复
- 关于新颖性的审稿意见该怎样回复
已经有25人回复
- 如何回复审稿人的意见
已经有7人回复
- 如何回复审稿人意见
已经有7人回复
- 关于回复审稿人意见！wiley Journal of Separation Science
已经有17人回复
- 投SCI外刊，如何回复审稿意见，谢谢！！！
已经有6人回复
- 审稿意见如何回复，求助
已经有4人回复
- 被拒后，回复审稿人意见如何投出
已经有9人回复
- 这种审稿意见是什么意思啊？怎么回复好哦
已经有41人回复
- 怎么回复审稿人的意见
已经有14人回复
- 怎么回复中文期刊的审稿意见，有没有模板啊？
已经有4人回复
- 如何回复审稿人提出的意见（语法错误）？
已经有4人回复
- 论文审稿意见回来了，大家看看如何回复啊
已经有16人回复
- 审稿意见回复（格式方面的），汉语大概意思已经写出来，求翻译
已经有5人回复
- 审稿意见怎么回复
已经有3人回复
- 一天 就回复审稿意见 会不会操之过急？
已经有17人回复
- 求计算物理方面 对于审稿人意见的回复模板，
已经有21人回复
- 对审稿意见的回复
已经有11人回复
- 审稿意见回复过程中与老板的意见有分歧，如何处理？烦请高人指点！
已经有8人回复
- 请大家帮忙看看如何回复审稿意见
已经有4人回复
- 审稿意见回复请教
已经有4人回复
- 审稿人意见如何回复？
已经有11人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
本子终于提交了。不用再看了，一切闲下来慢慢等。希望一切顺利！
+1/631
-
香港中文大学（深圳）靳羽华教授交叉实验室招募2026年材料学博士生（光致变色）
+2/134
-
中山大学附属医院实验和生信科研助理招聘
+1/91
-
求助有机化学第二版陆阳申东升主编课件或者电子版书籍
+1/86
-
春天就该逛吃逛吃
+1/75
-
西北大学化学与材料科学学院博士招生（还有两个名额，3月30日截至）
+1/63
-
【全额奖学金+英国博士学位】国科大杭高院Nathan课题组招收2026级联培博士生1名！
+1/47
-
巴黎西岱大学（Université Paris Cité）Fayna MAMMERI 导师寻找CSC公派博士生
+1/22
-
【实战型】【生物医药】2026青岛大学招博士生 含少数民族骨干计划2名！
+1/20
-
同济大学环境学院 肖倩特聘研究员课题组 招聘硕士/博士（长期有效）
+1/17
-
【深圳理工大学】院士工作站招聘博士后-电催化和有机电化学
+1/10
-
各种IgG抗体表达系统
+1/9
-
哈尔滨工业大学(深圳)国家级青年人才机械工程、热能与能源等专业26年入学博士招生
+1/6
-
上海师范大学有机化学专业研究生招生
+1/5
-
中国人民大学物理学系蔡鹏课题组招收优秀硕士博士研究生
+1/4
-
上海交通大学化学化工学院张智涛课题组诚聘博士后
+1/3
-
上海交通大学招聘：新型X射线管设计仿真计算工程师/博士后/助理研究员
+1/3
-
海南师范大学 孙元元老师团队招2026级硕士生2名
+1/3
-
中国农科院兰州牧药所兽药创新与耐药性科研团队聘科研助理，急急急！
+1/2
-
湘潭大学教师招聘
+1/1
2楼2013-02-26 21:24:12
