| 查看: 673 | 回复: 1 | |||
[交流]
AB审稿意见回复
|
|
analytical biochemistry因为做的太慢，只能投个差一点的杂志，1月底投，今天回复revise。意见如下 Dear **, Your manuscript has been reviewed by individuals knowledgeable in this field. Although the reviewers were interested in the paper, questions were raised that are summarized in the reviewers' comments below. Should you agree to revise the manuscript, please indicate the changes that have been made, and point-by-point responses to the reviewers' comments. In order to retain the original date of submission, a revised manuscript should be forwarded within two months of the date of this decision letter. Please submit your revision online by logging on to the Analytical Biochemistry Elsevier Editorial System: http://ees.elsevier.com/yabio/ Your username is: ****** If you need to retrieve password details, please go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/yabio/automail_query.asp Your manuscript record is located in the "Submissions Needing Revision" menu. When submitting your revised paper, please include a separate document called "Response to Reviews" detailing your responses to the comments of the reviewers. Most useful would be a copy in which the revisions are indicated directly on the manuscript, e.g. underlined or in color. Also include electronic source files for the text and figures that can be used for publication should the manuscript be accepted. These files should include the text, tables and figure legend in an editable format (MS Word preferred) and all figures saved individually as TIF or EPS files. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This manuscript reports **. The concept is worthy of investigation and some important experimental data has been provided on the operational performance of the sensor, including signal response and selectivity. However, there are significant problems with the authors' interpretation of some of the sensitivity and selectivity data and with a lack of clarity in some of their descriptions and conclusions. Specific points for the authors to address are detailed below. 5. Page 8 line 21 ". . . the height (27 +/- 2 nm) . . ." Over what surface area or over how many "islands" was this figure calculated? How indicative is it of the broader surface morphology over large areas? 7. Page 10 line 9 ". . . detection limit . . . 4 nM." This quoted detection limit is meaningless as you have not demonstrated actual detection of adenosine at anywhere near this concentration (your lowest non-blank standard is 200 nM). Based on the error in your blank point in Figure 3, three times its standard deviation would give a limit of detection of about 100-150 nM. Furthermore, this 4 nM figure does not agree with the 65 nM quoted in the abstract. Reviewer #2: 4) Looking at Figure 3, it seems difficult to see how the limit of detection could be 4 nM. Especially since it seems that the lowest concentration tested looks to be about 200 nM. Perhaps the authors could show an inset to the figure with concentrations up to only 100 nM. 其他问的问题都是咬文嚼字的小问题，就这几个问题比较大，不好回答，关于这个检测线，我是当时发现自己算错了，重新算过结果有些地方没有改过来，这个在回复的时候可以直接这样说么，还是有其他比较容易让审稿人接受的说法。他们说的是对的，是我当时没有搞好 关于用AFM观察表面形貌的，他问的应该是说我看的只是一个片子的一小部分，不能代表整个片子的情况，我是不是要用软件计算出整个片子上修饰物的量是多少才可以说明这个问题？ 谢谢 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有7人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有11人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- sci如何回复审稿意见，尤其是改格式的审稿意见？
已经有8人回复
- 英文审稿意见不知如何回复，求助！急
已经有6人回复
- 审稿人意见回复--有关参考文献的添加
已经有11人回复
- 如何回复nanotecnology的审稿意见，只收到了审稿意见，没有pdf版本的文章对照
已经有13人回复
- 关于新颖性的审稿意见该怎样回复
已经有25人回复
- 如何回复审稿人的意见
已经有7人回复
- 如何回复审稿人意见
已经有7人回复
- 关于回复审稿人意见！wiley Journal of Separation Science
已经有17人回复
- 投SCI外刊，如何回复审稿意见，谢谢！！！
已经有6人回复
- 审稿意见如何回复，求助
已经有4人回复
- 被拒后，回复审稿人意见如何投出
已经有9人回复
- 这种审稿意见是什么意思啊？怎么回复好哦
已经有41人回复
- 怎么回复审稿人的意见
已经有14人回复
- 怎么回复中文期刊的审稿意见，有没有模板啊？
已经有4人回复
- 如何回复审稿人提出的意见（语法错误）？
已经有4人回复
- 论文审稿意见回来了，大家看看如何回复啊
已经有16人回复
- 审稿意见回复（格式方面的），汉语大概意思已经写出来，求翻译
已经有5人回复
- 审稿意见怎么回复
已经有3人回复
- 一天 就回复审稿意见 会不会操之过急？
已经有17人回复
- 求计算物理方面 对于审稿人意见的回复模板，
已经有21人回复
- 对审稿意见的回复
已经有11人回复
- 审稿意见回复过程中与老板的意见有分歧，如何处理？烦请高人指点！
已经有8人回复
- 请大家帮忙看看如何回复审稿意见
已经有4人回复
- 审稿意见回复请教
已经有4人回复
- 审稿人意见如何回复？
已经有11人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
散金祈福
+5/4015
-
散金祈福
+3/795
-
每年这时候我都再仔细读一遍《范进中举》
+1/476
-
南方医科大学|生物材料与医学工程团队诚聘科研助理
+2/270
-
五大联赛看好哪支球队
+5/200
-
上海交通大学张航课题组招聘博士后（电化学储能）
+1/89
-
Polymers 期刊特刊 组稿
+1/76
-
哈尔滨工业大学（校本部）电子与信息工程学院2027级博士招生
+1/65
-
瑞典-博后-固态电池-粘结剂-锂离子电池方向
+1/37
-
瑞典-博后-固态电池-粘结剂-锂离子电池方向
+1/34
-
pcold 原核表达载体
+1/9
-
2027环境工程博士申请
+1/8
-
南方医科大学深圳医院陈烨/余涛教授课题组联合培养博士后招聘
+1/6
-
南京大学 智能驱动与感知材料实验室 诚招申请考核博士生/科研助理/博士后
+1/4
-
2026年国自然
+1/3
-
找女友
+1/2
-
新审查指南施行半年，AI方向的专利申请是不是更看"技术味"了？
+1/2
-
河海大学海洋环境污染与生态毒理学研究组招收2027级硕士生 及博士研究生
+1/2
-
江苏大学生物科学与技术学院雍阳春课题组招聘“合成生物学”副教授/讲师
+1/1
-
【产品测评分享】体外转录产量不理想、dsRNA 副产物高？T7 RNA 聚合酶实测体验
+1/1
2楼2013-02-26 21:24:12
