²é¿´: 606  |  »Ø¸´: 1

angel19860820

Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)


[½»Á÷] ABÉó¸åÒâ¼û»Ø¸´

analytical biochemistryÒòΪ×öµÄÌ«Âý£¬Ö»ÄÜͶ¸ö²îÒ»µãµÄÔÓÖ¾£¬1Ôµ×Ͷ£¬½ñÌì»Ø¸´revise¡£Òâ¼ûÈçÏÂ
Dear **,

Your manuscript has been reviewed by individuals knowledgeable in this field. Although the reviewers were interested in the paper, questions were raised that are summarized in the reviewers' comments below.

Should you agree to revise the manuscript, please indicate the changes that have been made, and point-by-point responses to the reviewers' comments. In order to retain the original date of submission, a revised manuscript should be forwarded within two months of the date of this decision letter.

Please submit your revision online by logging on to the Analytical Biochemistry Elsevier Editorial System:
http://ees.elsevier.com/yabio/

Your username is: ******
If you need to retrieve password details, please go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/yabio/automail_query.asp

Your manuscript record is located in the "Submissions Needing Revision" menu.

When submitting your revised paper, please include a separate document called "Response to Reviews" detailing your responses to the comments of the reviewers. Most useful would be a copy in which the revisions are indicated directly on the manuscript, e.g. underlined or in color. Also include electronic source files for the text and figures that can be used for publication should the manuscript be accepted. These files should include the text, tables and figure legend in an editable format (MS Word preferred) and all figures saved individually as TIF or EPS files.


Reviewers' comments:


Reviewer #1: This manuscript reports **. The concept is worthy of investigation and some important experimental data has been provided on the operational performance of the sensor, including signal response and selectivity. However, there are significant problems with the authors' interpretation of some of the sensitivity and selectivity data and with a lack of clarity in some of their descriptions and conclusions. Specific points for the authors to address are detailed below.

5. Page 8 line 21 ". . . the height (27 +/- 2 nm) . . ." Over what surface area or over how many "islands" was this figure calculated? How indicative is it of the broader surface morphology over large areas?

7. Page 10 line 9 ". . . detection limit . . . 4 nM." This quoted detection limit is meaningless as you have not demonstrated actual detection of adenosine at anywhere near this concentration (your lowest non-blank standard is 200 nM). Based on the error in your blank point in Figure 3, three times its standard deviation would give a limit of detection of about 100-150 nM. Furthermore, this 4 nM figure does not agree with the 65 nM quoted in the abstract.


Reviewer #2:
4) Looking at Figure 3, it seems difficult to see how the limit of detection could be 4 nM. Especially since it seems that the lowest concentration tested looks to be about 200 nM. Perhaps the authors could show an inset to the figure with concentrations up to only 100 nM.
ÆäËûÎʵÄÎÊÌâ¶¼ÊÇÒ§ÎĽÀ×ÖµÄСÎÊÌ⣬¾ÍÕ⼸¸öÎÊÌâ±È½Ï´ó£¬²»ºÃ»Ø´ð£¬¹ØÓÚÕâ¸ö¼ì²âÏߣ¬ÎÒÊǵ±Ê±·¢ÏÖ×Ô¼ºËã´íÁË£¬ÖØÐÂËã¹ý½á¹ûÓÐЩµØ·½Ã»ÓиĹýÀ´£¬Õâ¸öÔڻظ´µÄʱºò¿ÉÒÔÖ±½ÓÕâÑù˵ô£¬»¹ÊÇÓÐÆäËû±È½ÏÈÝÒ×ÈÃÉó¸åÈ˽ÓÊܵÄ˵·¨¡£ËûÃÇ˵µÄÊǶԵģ¬ÊÇÎÒµ±Ê±Ã»ÓиãºÃ
¹ØÓÚÓÃAFM¹Û²ì±íÃæÐÎòµÄ£¬ËûÎʵÄÓ¦¸ÃÊÇ˵ÎÒ¿´µÄÖ»ÊÇÒ»¸öƬ×ÓµÄһС²¿·Ö£¬²»ÄÜ´ú±íÕû¸öƬ×ÓµÄÇé¿ö£¬ÎÒÊDz»ÊÇÒªÓÃÈí¼þ¼ÆËã³öÕû¸öƬ×ÓÉÏÐÞÊÎÎïµÄÁ¿ÊǶàÉٲſÉÒÔ˵Ã÷Õâ¸öÎÊÌ⣿
лл
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶

» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:

» ÇÀ½ð±ÒÀ²£¡»ØÌû¾Í¿ÉÒԵõ½:

²é¿´È«²¿É¢½ðÌù

ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

angel19860820

Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)


ijÈ˻ظ´Ã´£¿AFM¿ÉÒÔ¼ÆËã±íÃæÐÞÊÎÁ¿Ã´
2Â¥2013-02-26 21:24:12
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
Ïà¹Ø°æ¿éÌø×ª ÎÒÒª¶©ÔÄÂ¥Ö÷ angel19860820 µÄÖ÷Ìâ¸üÐÂ
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[¿¼ÑÐ] 086003ʳƷ¹¤³ÌÇóµ÷¼Á +6 íµíµ111 2026-03-24 6/300 2026-03-25 10:29 by 3Strings
[¿¼ÑÐ] 295Çóµ÷¼Á +6 Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¾©Çø211 2026-03-18 8/400 2026-03-25 10:28 by userper
[¿¼ÑÐ] 08¹¤Ñ§µ÷¼Á +12 Óû§573181 2026-03-20 17/850 2026-03-24 21:45 by ·¬ÇÑìÀÁËÎ÷ºìÊÁ
[¿¼ÑÐ] ²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á +6 Æ¥¿Ëi 2026-03-23 6/300 2026-03-24 21:09 by greychen00
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0854AI CV·½ÏòÕÐÊÕµ÷¼Á +3 ÕÂСÓã567 2026-03-23 3/150 2026-03-24 20:25 by Íô£¡£¿£¡
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çóµ÷¼Á +6 ÑÐÑУ¬½Óµç»° 2026-03-24 7/350 2026-03-24 17:01 by barlinike
[¿¼ÑÐ] 292Çóµ÷¼Á +4 ¶ì¶ì¶ì¶î¶î¶î¶î¶ 2026-03-24 4/200 2026-03-24 16:41 by peike
[¿¼ÑÐ] ²ÄÁÏ292µ÷¼Á +8 éÙËÌ˼ÃÀÈË 2026-03-23 8/400 2026-03-24 16:33 by laoshidan
[¿¼ÑÐ] 300Çóµ÷¼Á£¬²ÄÁÏ¿ÆÑ§Ó¢Ò»Êý¶þ +5 leaflight 2026-03-24 5/250 2026-03-24 16:25 by laoshidan
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÉÂʦ´óÉúÎïѧ071000£¬298·Ö£¬Çóµ÷¼Á +3 SYA£¡ 2026-03-23 3/150 2026-03-23 19:09 by macy2011
[¿¼ÑÐ] 350Çóµ÷¼Á +6 weudhdk 2026-03-19 6/300 2026-03-23 15:47 by tangyuan0840221
[¿¼ÑÐ] 328Çóµ÷¼Á +4 LHHL66 2026-03-23 4/200 2026-03-23 14:55 by lbsjt
[¿¼ÑÐ] 298Çóµ÷¼Á +8 Éϰ¶6666@ 2026-03-20 8/400 2026-03-23 11:02 by laoshidan
[¿¼ÑÐ] 333Çóµ÷¼Á +6 87639 2026-03-21 10/500 2026-03-23 10:41 by Iveryant
[¿¼ÑÐ] 291Çóµ÷¼Á +5 ‹üÈA 2026-03-22 5/250 2026-03-23 09:20 by haoshis
[¿¼ÑÐ] ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤085600£¬×Ü·Ö304£¬±¾¿ÆÓÐÁ½Æªsci²ÎÓ룬Çóµ÷¼Á +4 ÐÒÔ˵Ľ´½´ 2026-03-22 5/250 2026-03-22 20:15 by edmund7
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çóµ÷¼Á +5 Zhangbod 2026-03-21 7/350 2026-03-22 13:13 by Zhangbod
[¿¼ÑÐ] 22 350 ±¾¿Æ985Çóµ÷¼Á£¬ÇóÀϵÇÊÕÁô +3 ÀîéóÄÐ003 2026-03-20 3/150 2026-03-21 13:28 by ²«»÷518
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ Î÷±±´óѧ £¬070300»¯Ñ§Ñ§Ë¶£¬×Ü·Ö287£¬Ë«·ÇÒ»±¾£¬Çóµ÷¼Á¡£ +4 ³¿»èÏßÓëÐǺ£ 2026-03-19 4/200 2026-03-20 22:15 by JourneyLucky
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ËÕÖÝ´óѧ²ÄÁÏÇóµ÷¼Á£¬×Ü·Ö315£¨Ó¢Ò»£© +5 sbdksD 2026-03-19 5/250 2026-03-20 22:10 by luoyongfeng
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û