| 查看: 617 | 回复: 1 | |||
[交流]
AB审稿意见回复
|
|
analytical biochemistry因为做的太慢，只能投个差一点的杂志，1月底投，今天回复revise。意见如下 Dear **, Your manuscript has been reviewed by individuals knowledgeable in this field. Although the reviewers were interested in the paper, questions were raised that are summarized in the reviewers' comments below. Should you agree to revise the manuscript, please indicate the changes that have been made, and point-by-point responses to the reviewers' comments. In order to retain the original date of submission, a revised manuscript should be forwarded within two months of the date of this decision letter. Please submit your revision online by logging on to the Analytical Biochemistry Elsevier Editorial System: http://ees.elsevier.com/yabio/ Your username is: ****** If you need to retrieve password details, please go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/yabio/automail_query.asp Your manuscript record is located in the "Submissions Needing Revision" menu. When submitting your revised paper, please include a separate document called "Response to Reviews" detailing your responses to the comments of the reviewers. Most useful would be a copy in which the revisions are indicated directly on the manuscript, e.g. underlined or in color. Also include electronic source files for the text and figures that can be used for publication should the manuscript be accepted. These files should include the text, tables and figure legend in an editable format (MS Word preferred) and all figures saved individually as TIF or EPS files. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This manuscript reports **. The concept is worthy of investigation and some important experimental data has been provided on the operational performance of the sensor, including signal response and selectivity. However, there are significant problems with the authors' interpretation of some of the sensitivity and selectivity data and with a lack of clarity in some of their descriptions and conclusions. Specific points for the authors to address are detailed below. 5. Page 8 line 21 ". . . the height (27 +/- 2 nm) . . ." Over what surface area or over how many "islands" was this figure calculated? How indicative is it of the broader surface morphology over large areas? 7. Page 10 line 9 ". . . detection limit . . . 4 nM." This quoted detection limit is meaningless as you have not demonstrated actual detection of adenosine at anywhere near this concentration (your lowest non-blank standard is 200 nM). Based on the error in your blank point in Figure 3, three times its standard deviation would give a limit of detection of about 100-150 nM. Furthermore, this 4 nM figure does not agree with the 65 nM quoted in the abstract. Reviewer #2: 4) Looking at Figure 3, it seems difficult to see how the limit of detection could be 4 nM. Especially since it seems that the lowest concentration tested looks to be about 200 nM. Perhaps the authors could show an inset to the figure with concentrations up to only 100 nM. 其他问的问题都是咬文嚼字的小问题，就这几个问题比较大，不好回答，关于这个检测线，我是当时发现自己算错了，重新算过结果有些地方没有改过来，这个在回复的时候可以直接这样说么，还是有其他比较容易让审稿人接受的说法。他们说的是对的，是我当时没有搞好 关于用AFM观察表面形貌的，他问的应该是说我看的只是一个片子的一小部分，不能代表整个片子的情况，我是不是要用软件计算出整个片子上修饰物的量是多少才可以说明这个问题？ 谢谢 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
湖南大学刘巧玲课题组2026年第二批次博士研究生招生信息
已经有5人回复
-
求计算机方向调剂
已经有6人回复
-
通信工程求调剂！！！
已经有7人回复
-
26药学专硕105500求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
297，工科调剂?
已经有11人回复
-
申博自荐
已经有4人回复
-
294求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
291求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
304求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
求调剂推荐
已经有9人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- sci如何回复审稿意见，尤其是改格式的审稿意见？
已经有8人回复
- 英文审稿意见不知如何回复，求助！急
已经有6人回复
- 审稿人意见回复--有关参考文献的添加
已经有11人回复
- 如何回复nanotecnology的审稿意见，只收到了审稿意见，没有pdf版本的文章对照
已经有13人回复
- 关于新颖性的审稿意见该怎样回复
已经有25人回复
- 如何回复审稿人的意见
已经有7人回复
- 如何回复审稿人意见
已经有7人回复
- 关于回复审稿人意见！wiley Journal of Separation Science
已经有17人回复
- 投SCI外刊，如何回复审稿意见，谢谢！！！
已经有6人回复
- 审稿意见如何回复，求助
已经有4人回复
- 被拒后，回复审稿人意见如何投出
已经有9人回复
- 这种审稿意见是什么意思啊？怎么回复好哦
已经有41人回复
- 怎么回复审稿人的意见
已经有14人回复
- 怎么回复中文期刊的审稿意见，有没有模板啊？
已经有4人回复
- 如何回复审稿人提出的意见（语法错误）？
已经有4人回复
- 论文审稿意见回来了，大家看看如何回复啊
已经有16人回复
- 审稿意见回复（格式方面的），汉语大概意思已经写出来，求翻译
已经有5人回复
- 审稿意见怎么回复
已经有3人回复
- 一天 就回复审稿意见 会不会操之过急？
已经有17人回复
- 求计算物理方面 对于审稿人意见的回复模板，
已经有21人回复
- 对审稿意见的回复
已经有11人回复
- 审稿意见回复过程中与老板的意见有分歧，如何处理？烦请高人指点！
已经有8人回复
- 请大家帮忙看看如何回复审稿意见
已经有4人回复
- 审稿意见回复请教
已经有4人回复
- 审稿人意见如何回复？
已经有11人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
泰国排名第一世界排名221位朱拉隆功大学在华招生-在华就读学院正式招生了
+1/85
-
中山大学牛利课题组招收光/电催化方向博士后
+1/83
-
盐城师范学院生物与医药（生物技术与工程领域）还有调剂名额
+1/78
-
香港城市大学（东莞）雷进程博士课题组招聘研究助理
+1/78
-
桂林理工大学物理学专业招收调剂，还有三个名额！！！
+1/38
-
中国科学院深圳先进技术研究院院士团队低维材料方向博士后招聘
+1/36
-
中国林科院博士招生/读博
+2/34
-
成都大学药学院-药学1055专硕：新导师开山弟子火热招募中
+1/33
-
中国农业大学资源与环境学院 - 招聘杰出人才、青年研究员、优秀人才和博士后
+1/11
-
广东公办省属高校招聘博士后2名，优秀可申请留校。年薪28-40万，科研奖励另计
+1/9
-
上海交通大学与东方理工联培博士招生-2026年9月入学
+1/9
-
天津理工大学（晶体材料全国重点实验室）杰青团队招收2026年博士研究生
+1/8
-
稀土发光分析｜核壳结构｜寿命拟合
+1/7
-
为什么很多发了优秀论文的博士却不再走科研之路？
+1/7
-
广东石油化工学院刘诗咏教授团队化学化工、材料科学等方向尚有调剂名额
+1/6
-
华南师范大学环境学院大分子体系多尺度模拟与实验研究团队招收2026年考研调剂生1名
+1/5
-
接收资源与环境专业硕士调剂
+1/5
-
中科院大连化物所/香港城市大学招聘联合培养优秀博士后人才
+2/4
-
西安工程大学环境与化学工程学院学硕调剂（专硕可调学硕）
+1/2
-
求英文文献
+1/2
2楼2013-02-26 21:24:12
