| ²é¿´: 1853 | »Ø¸´: 7 | ||||
caiyidongÌú³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´Òâ¼û£¬ËÓÐÀàËÆµÄ»Ø¸´£¬Çë°ïæÌṩµãÒâ¼û£¬Ð»Ð»£¡
|
|
Reviewer #1 finished his review on early December, but Reviewer #2 has not responded yet even though we sent many reminder mails. I think we have to give up his input. Then I tried to read his comments and your answers. Unfortunately your answer was not kind enough. Although we always request that non-specific statements such as "revised," "accepted," or "acknowledged," will not be accepted, your answers are all like this.?Please submit a correction list, which clearly shows the sentences before and after amendments. Õâ¸öcorrection list ´ó¸ÅÊÇÒ»¸öʲôģÑù£¬¸÷λÓÐÄ£°åÂð£¿Ð»Ð» |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
302·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á Ò»Ö¾Ô¸°²»Õ´óѧ085601
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤371Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
313Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì302·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïѧ308·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á£¨Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ª¶«Ê¦´ó£©
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á£¨085602£¬¹ýËļ¶£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸985£©
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
¸´ÊÔµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Çó
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´ÕâÑùµÄ»Ø¸´ÊDz»ÊÇÒâζ×Å¿ÉÒÔ¸ÄͶÆäËûÆÚ¿¯ÁË£¿£¡
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
½ñÄêÇà»ùµÄÆÀÉóÒâ¼û£¬´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´£¬½ñÄêÔõôÌá¸ß¸Ä½ø£¿Ð»Ð»
ÒѾÓÐ52È˻ظ´
ҽѧ²¿µÄÆÀÉóÒâ¼û°ïæ¿´Ï£¬´ó¼Ò¶¼¸øµãÒâ¼û£¬À´ÄêºÃÐ޸ģ¡
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÆÀÉóÈ˻ظ´µÄÒâ¼û£¬Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´ÏÂÕâ¸öÒªÔõô¸Ä£¿
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Çë°ï濴һϣ¬¹ØÓÚµç×ÓÓëÐÅϢѧ±¨ÍËÐÞÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´µç×ÓÓëÐÅϢѧ±¨µÄÍâÉóÒâ¼û£¬Ð»Ð»£¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
´ó¼Ò°ïæ¸øµãÒâ¼û£¬ÎÒÓ¦¸ÃÈçºÎÑ¡Ôñ£¬Ð»Ð»£¡
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´Õâ¸öÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¨²»Ì«Ã÷°×Éó¸åÈËÓÐûÓÐÌá³öÐÞ¸ÄÒâ¼û£©
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
¼ÆËã»ú¼°Ïà¹Ø×¨Òµ°ïæ¿´ÏÂÕâÌõÒâ¼ûÔõô»Ø¸´£¬Ð»Ð»ÁË
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Ͷ¸åÓдð¸´ÁË£¬Ð©Ðí¼¤¶¯Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´£¬Ð»Ð»´ó¼Ò£¡£¨ÔÚ13Â¥Ôö¼ÓµÚ¶þ·âÉó¸åÒâ¼û£©
ÒѾÓÐ32È˻ظ´
´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´ÎҵĹúÇàÆÀÉóÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´ÆÀÉóÒâ¼û£¬ÉÏ»áûÓУ¬Ð޸ĺóÃ÷ÄêÓÐÏ£ÍûÂð
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´ÆÀÉóÒâ¼ûÊDz»ÊÇ3B£¬ÖÐÁË£¬ÔËÆø
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Ò²Çë¸ßÈËÖ¸µã£¬°ïæ¿´¿´Ã¿Î»ÆÀίµÄÒâ¼ûÊÇʲô£¿£¨50½ð±Ò£¬»ØÌû1½ð±Ò£©
ÒѾÓÐ84È˻ظ´
Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´ÕâÁ½ÌõÒâ¼û£¬ÒªÁËÃüÁË¡£¡£¡£
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿Âé·³°ïæ¿´¿´ÎÒµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼ûÔõô»Ø¸´°¡£¬¹ØÓÚSEIĤ
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
ÓоÑéµÄ°ïæ¿´¿´PRLµÄÕâ·âÒâ¼ûÈçºÎ»Ø¸´
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿²©µ¼»Ø¸´£¬´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´ÓÐϷû£¬Ð»Ð»£¡
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´Î񵀮ÀÒéÒâ¼û£¨Î´ÖÐ £©£¬¶àлÌá³öÖ¸µ¼Òâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´Ò»ÏÂÎ񵀮ÀÉóÒâ¼û·ÖÊý£¨ÒÑÖУ©£¬Ð»Ð»£¡
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÒâ¼û£¬´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Çë´ó¼Ò°ïæ¿´¿´ÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Éó¸åÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
rockinuk
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- SEPI: 10
- Ó¦Öú: 1512 (½²Ê¦)
- ½ð±Ò: 7810.9
- É¢½ð: 189
- ºì»¨: 106
- Ìû×Ó: 3982
- ÔÚÏß: 570.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1945379
- ×¢²á: 2012-08-19
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÊýÂÛ

2Â¥2013-02-02 21:49:22
nono2009
³¬¼¶°æÖ÷ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
No gains, no pains.
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- Ó¦Öú: 28684 (Ժʿ)
- ¹ó±ö: 513.911
- ½ð±Ò: 2555230
- É¢½ð: 27828
- ºì»¨: 2148
- ɳ·¢: 66666
- Ìû×Ó: 1602255
- ÔÚÏß: 65200.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 827383
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¤³ÌÈÈÎïÀíÓëÄÜÔ´ÀûÓÃ
- ¹ÜϽ: ¿ÆÑмҳﱸίԱ»á
3Â¥2013-02-02 22:00:44
rockinuk
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- SEPI: 10
- Ó¦Öú: 1512 (½²Ê¦)
- ½ð±Ò: 7810.9
- É¢½ð: 189
- ºì»¨: 106
- Ìû×Ó: 3982
- ÔÚÏß: 570.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1945379
- ×¢²á: 2012-08-19
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÊýÂÛ

4Â¥2013-02-02 22:03:31
paperhunter
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
»¹Ã»ÏëºÃ
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +14 - SEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 14603 (½ÌÊÚ)
- ¹ó±ö: 11.659
- ½ð±Ò: 345467
- É¢½ð: 9262
- ºì»¨: 1423
- ɳ·¢: 2016
- Ìû×Ó: 127554
- ÔÚÏß: 8880.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 971012
- ×¢²á: 2010-03-14
- רҵ: »·¾³¹¤³Ì
- ¹ÜϽ: ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
caiyidong: ½ð±Ò+12, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸ 2013-02-03 12:04:18
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
caiyidong: ½ð±Ò+12, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸ 2013-02-03 12:04:18
|
List of Responses Dear Editor and Reviewers: Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers¡¯ comments concerning our manuscript entitled ¡°Paper Title¡± (ID: ÎÄÕ¸åºÅ). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer¡¯s comments are as flowing: Responds to the reviewer¡¯s comments: Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (¡¡¼òÒªÁгöÒâ¼û¡¡) Response: ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á 2. Response to comment: (¡¡¼òÒªÁгöÒâ¼û¡¡) Response: ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á ¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£¡£ ÖðÌõÒâ¼û»Ø´ð£¬ÇмÉÒ»¶¨²»ÄÜÓÐÒÅ© Õë¶Ô²»Í¬µÄÎÊÌâÓÐÏÂÁм¸¸öÀñòÊõÓï¿ÉÊʵ±ÓÃÓ㺠We are very sorry for our negligence of ¡¡... We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ¡¡... It is really true as Reviewer suggested that¡¡ We have made correction according to the Reviewer¡¯s comments. We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer¡¯s suggestion As Reviewer suggested that¡¡ Considering the Reviewer¡¯s suggestion, we have ¡¡ ×îºóÌØÒâ¸ÐлһÏÂÕâ¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û£º Special thanks to you for your good comments. Reviewer #2: ͬÉÏÊö Reviewer #3: ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á Other changes: 1. Line 60-61, the statements of ¡°¡¡¡± were corrected as ¡°¡¡¡¡¡± 2. Line 107, ¡°¡¡¡± was added 3. Line 129, ¡°¡¡¡± was deleted ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper. We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers¡¯ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval. Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions. http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2083980 |

5Â¥2013-02-02 22:12:44
¾ýƽÀ³
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 1513 (½²Ê¦)
- ½ð±Ò: 5708.9
- ºì»¨: 12
- Ìû×Ó: 4085
- ÔÚÏß: 90.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2226265
- ×¢²á: 2013-01-07
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ͨÐÅÀíÂÛÓëϵͳ
6Â¥2013-02-03 08:46:59
pjiang
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1942.2
- É¢½ð: 126
- ºì»¨: 3
- ɳ·¢: 6
- Ìû×Ó: 765
- ÔÚÏß: 120.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1084113
- ×¢²á: 2010-08-29
- רҵ: ºôÎüϵͳÖ×Áö

7Â¥2013-02-03 09:40:18
rockinuk
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- SEPI: 10
- Ó¦Öú: 1512 (½²Ê¦)
- ½ð±Ò: 7810.9
- É¢½ð: 189
- ºì»¨: 106
- Ìû×Ó: 3982
- ÔÚÏß: 570.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1945379
- ×¢²á: 2012-08-19
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÊýÂÛ

8Â¥2013-02-03 12:12:23














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

