24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1748  |  回复: 7
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lbyzmy5

铜虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 审稿人希望增加内容,但是无法增加已有6人参与

投的Renewable energy

网站上状态是“Accept as Full paper with revision”
给的审稿意见是:
I am pleased to inform you that your paper has been accepted for publication provided that you amend it according to the concerns raised in the review report given below.  You should resubmit the paper when you have addressed these issues.(这表示是不是accept的可能性很大呀)

The first sentence of paragraph 4 should be amended to commence:
--(这是什么意思,我也看到别人的意见也有这个)--
When you submit the revised manuscript, please also:

a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments
   
  AND/OR

b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed


To submit your revision, please do the following:

1. Go to: http://ees.elsevier.com/rene/

2. Enter your login details

3. Click [Author Login]
This takes you to the Author Main Menu.

4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision]
I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Yours sincerely,

A.A.M. Sayigh
Editor-in-Chief
Renewable Energy

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: This looks interesting, but I feel it could be improved with a little more information about the types of expertise being considered. There is mention of the role of wind turbine engineering (which I would imagine would include aerospace expertise and power systems engineering) but most of the data you mention (Table 3) seems to be about solar PV and associated electronics/materials engineering.  There is also hydro of course as well as solar thermal/CSP, and geothermal heat and power and even wave/tidal power, along with solar heat and biomass/biogas - the latter two involving, respectively, heating and ventilation engineering and agricultural engineering. For your study it may of course be necessary just to focus on well defined areas  where there is data, but at present I don't feel we get much a sense of what the full range of expertise needed and available really is.





******************************************
Please note that the editorial process varies considerably from journal to journal. To view a sample editorial process, please click here:
http://help.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/p/7923/a_id/160

For further assistance, please visit our customer support site at http://help.elsevier.com/app/answers/list/p/7923. Here you can search for solutions on a range of topics, find answers to frequently asked questions and learn more about EES via interactive tutorials. You will also find our 24/7 support contact details should you need any further assistance from one of our customer support representatives.


审稿人希望增加一些内容,但是文中只是使用指出的太阳能作为例子,而且其它的数据也很难得到。文中(即审稿人描述的表3)只是说明我们所提出的模型具有可行性;如果我们得到更多的数据,可以直接加进去进行计算,同样也会有很好的效果。但是现在没有其他的数据(只有太阳能的数据),无法按照审稿人的要求增加,怎么办呢?如果要修改,这算是小修还是大修呢?

[ Last edited by lbyzmy5 on 2013-1-30 at 17:57 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cadcfd

铁杆木虫 (文坛精英)

给一个合理的解释,说服审稿人即可。录用概率大。
3楼2013-01-30 18:38:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 8 个回答

nom8393

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
不要直接回绝审稿人的要求。最好是详细给他解释一下你的想法和客观限制,并尽力做出符合他要求的调整。
2楼2013-01-30 18:13:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
进行解释吧,说明无法增加内容的苦衷
4楼2013-01-30 19:10:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dut_ameng

专家顾问 (知名作家)

一只小小小小鸟


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
实事求是,好好说明不能补的原因。编辑这么肯定你的文章,解释好了是有可能接受的。
天性驽钝,唯勤学以补之。。。
5楼2013-01-30 19:59:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见