|
|
[交流]
大虫们帮我看看 审稿意见 中的希望大不大！
|
The manuscript of Zhao et al. introduces a new optimisation method for an existing quality function, to find communities in networks. The new method is capable of delivering good results. This fact would justify the publication of the manuscript, if it were clear that the new method is an improvement over the original one, published in [1]. Unfortunately, the manuscript does not contain a comparison between the old and the proposed method's results, so it is not clear whether the main point of the manuscript is indeed a step forward. If the authors can show that their new method is superior to the original one (the appropriate test being the LFR benchmark), or at least is significantly faster, the manuscript worth publication. Comparison to the old method is required also in the second case. |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有7人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
查看全部散金贴
|
回复此楼
+1/885
