| 查看: 323 | 回复: 0 | ||
[求助]
审稿意见，看不懂什么意思，谁给翻译一下？
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------ There are several typo's in the abstract section, and I have noted and attempted to correct these as annotations to the pdf (attached). I have the following comments. 1. I associate the space group Fddd with twinning. The I-sigma of this data looks good, and the R-int is low but the R-factor seems higher that normal. Is the structure lower symmetry and twinned? I would have collected higher angle data for this crystal. 2. The CHCl2 disorder should be handled better. I'd have split the Cl atoms into 2 parts and made sure that the bond lengths, ADP's are normal. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ There is a major problem with the data. This first shows up in the weighting scheme which was reported as w=1/[\s^2^(Fo^2^)+(0.1183P)^2^+358.2681P]. The second value of 358 is impossibly large and downweights all the weak data. When I refined it I got a values of w=1/[\s^2^(Fo^2^)+(0.0923P)^2^+180.7258P] which is still very bad. Doing an analysis of variance in PLATON gave the following Fc/Fc(max) 0.000 0.014 0.030 0.048 0.068 0.090 0.112 0.137 0.175 0.248 1.000 Number in Group 249 248 248 248 247 247 249 248 248 247 GooF 0.845 0.934 0.933 0.988 1.008 1.018 1.028 0.923 0.949 1.078 K 0.980 1.064 1.055 0.999 1.013 1.007 1.005 1.002 0.991 1.034 Resolution(A) 0.83 0.86 0.89 0.93 0.98 1.04 1.12 1.23 1.42 1.78 12.33 Number in Group 249 248 248 248 247 248 248 247 249 247 GooF 0.656 0.613 0.631 0.651 0.711 0.774 0.890 1.118 1.369 1.677 K 1.041 1.032 1.016 0.994 0.981 0.987 0.988 1.001 1.037 1.035 Resolution Dependence for Fc/Fc(max) .LT. 0.030 Resolution(A) 0.83 0.86 0.89 0.93 0.98 1.04 1.12 1.23 1.42 1.78 12.33 Number in Group 86 67 71 54 63 48 39 31 21 17 GooF 0.707 0.675 0.757 0.774 0.687 0.938 0.797 1.135 1.400 1.892 K 0.939 0.969 0.974 1.000 0.970 0.963 1.033 1.335 1.320 2.034 The goof as a function of reolution goes from 0.656 ti 1.677 when it should be nearly constant at one. All this suggests real problems with the data especially the high angle data. Since there is minimal absorption this correction is not responsible. The referee suggests twinning may be respoinsible but this is not clear. At the very least the data needs to be integrated again (SAINT) using different parameters. If this does not solve the problem then a new data set needs to be collected on a different crystal. Note: no amount of refinement on this data will solve the problem. [ Last edited by 小科学家 on 2012-8-24 at 10:18 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
中南大学易小艺课题组诚招2026申请-考核制博士生
已经有0人回复
-
海南师范大学招收化学博士（光电功能材料课题组招收博士研究生）
已经有10人回复
-
无机化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有168人回复
-
求助几个团簇的cif
已经有0人回复
-
急求该反应的详细机理
已经有4人回复
找到一些相关的精华帖子，希望有用哦~
审稿人的意见，求助大家帮忙一下哈
已经有12人回复
- 【求助】审稿意见：不想补实验怎么办？非常感谢！
已经有14人回复
- 审稿意见如何回复，求助
已经有4人回复
- [求助]如何处理这样的审稿意见：The study is descriptive in nature
已经有12人回复
- 【求助】麻烦帮忙看看我的审稿意见怎么回复啊，关于SEI膜
已经有13人回复
- 【求助】审稿意见，怎么解决
已经有4人回复
- 【求助】审稿意见该怎么改呀！让我做粉末的小角度衍射？
已经有13人回复
- 【求助】帮忙看这个审稿意见如何回复
已经有3人回复
- 【求助】审稿人意见，不是很懂，大家帮帮忙！
已经有21人回复
- 【求助】晶体学报E 的审稿人给了几条修改意见，不知如何解答，请高手指教！！！
已经有7人回复
- 【求助】审稿意见大家帮忙看看，急呀！
已经有8人回复
- 审稿人意见求助，怎么回答呢
已经有11人回复
点击这里搜索更多相关资源科研从小木虫开始，人人为我，我为人人