21楼: Originally posted by wuheng167 at 2012-05-28 22:53:36
其实我也觉得测超电容性质的影响因素太多，甚至二电极跟三电极测出来的结果都不一样！

2楼: Originally posted by 857688363 at 2012-05-24 21:44:07
楼主想过没有如果早期没有实验室中的经验，商用的又从何谈起。商用的只是在此基础上优化和工业化了。

23楼: Originally posted by hfkiln at 2012-06-21 09:25:47
非常赞同...

11楼: Originally posted by wuheng167 at 2012-05-26 22:59:59
你多看看文献吧！朱彦武去年的science 以及今年的science 你看看比不比得上活性炭！通常的活性炭虽然比表面积高，但大多是微孔，对电容贡献不大！有些文章就直接对比了商用活性炭 你可以看看huiming cheng 08年的a ...

26楼: Originally posted by wuheng167 at 2012-07-29 21:45:59
嗯，也有些文章这么讲！不过大多数还是认为没多大贡献~！

25楼: Originally posted by magnolia_xu at 2012-07-28 21:01:25
现在不是讲亚微孔0.8nm左右的，对比电容影响很大么？
Multiple studies have promoted that a maximum
EDLC is achievable in sub-micropores (0.7–0.8 nm), and with an
increase in the micropore surface a ...

28楼: Originally posted by hhxxa at 2012-07-29 22:29:52
微孔肯定对电容式有贡献的 活性炭大部分都是微孔 比电容都很高的...

28楼: Originally posted by hhxxa at 2012-07-29 22:29:52
微孔肯定对电容式有贡献的 活性炭大部分都是微孔 比电容都很高的...