24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1736  |  回复: 11

jonavy

金虫 (小有名气)

奔向月球

[求助] 稿子悲剧了,贴意见求分析

With regret, I must inform you that, based on the advice received, your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in ******** as an original paper. Attached, please find the reviewers' comments.

The first reviewer is of the opinion that, although the field examples of real rock behaviour are potentially valuable, the manuscript in its present form has too many problems to be publishable in the Journal. The same reviewer points out that:
1.the introduction is superficial and the lumping together of all major discontinuities as "faults", albeit that they have later movement on them is incorrect and would confuse the literature.
2.the physical models lack the scientific basis to justify any conclusions .
3.the statement on page 8 that the formation of the solidified model is similar to "the conditions under which the rock mass solidified" illustrates quite clearly the lack of any appreciation of the geological reality by the authors.

The second reviewer feels that the results reported can be considered of interest from a qualitative point of view only. He is suggesting to have the contribution  rewritten in the form of a technical note. He points out the following:
1.a quantitative comparison with numerical modelling and a detailed structural analysis of the pit mine are lacking.
2.in many portions of the manuscript, an "unscientific" language is used.
3.the general organisation of the work need to be greatly improved.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that your manuscript should be re-written in the form of a technical note (2000 to 2500 words, 5 figures, no abstract is needed) by accounting for the reviewers' comments which are attached herewith.

I would like to thank you very much for forwarding your manuscript to us for consideration.

Sincerely yours,

注:最后给的reject

[ Last edited by jonavy on 2012-1-11 at 14:51 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wellyy2005

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

s

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 15:44:14
还有机会,好好修改,重新投啊-----------
2楼2012-01-11 15:07:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ljtwcx

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 15:44:20
要有信心,改改再投吧!
3楼2012-01-11 15:28:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wangyidong9165

金虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 15:44:28
重投, a technical note
土壤工作者
4楼2012-01-11 15:41:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

djclj

禁虫 (文坛精英)

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 很多地方难以再深入修改,更高的杂志不敢奢望了,目前都不知道怎么修改了 2012-01-11 16:14:00
本帖内容被屏蔽

5楼2012-01-11 15:58:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhaoeager

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 18:05:17
按照审稿人的意见改完后,文章肯定上一个档次。祝福祝福。
你一定要,你就一定能。
6楼2012-01-11 16:35:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

frank213

木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 18:05:28
审稿人的意见很重要。我就是这样花费了很多功夫在上面。会有收获的
中庸不中道
7楼2012-01-11 16:40:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yaoyao145

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 18:05:51
审稿人的意见应该很中肯 楼主改改换个期刊投吧 文章就是这样投了改了再投 慢慢会好的
8楼2012-01-11 16:43:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

icool1314

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 18:06:24
不太懂你这个专业,从审稿意见来判断,专家提的问题可能对你来讲比较麻烦,文章估计是必须要经过大修的。认真和老板讨论下吧,这专家的意见应该还是很中肯的,怎么按照专家说的改。改后再重投
9楼2012-01-11 17:00:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lyy-bbg

金虫 (著名写手)

verge

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jonavy(金币+10): 2012-01-11 18:06:45
感觉审稿人提的问题挺深刻的。意见还是值得好好思考的,要按着这个好好修改,祝好运
追求过便无所憾
10楼2012-01-11 17:04:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 jonavy 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 29号明天会评吗 +4 笨笨唐 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-31 09:30 by huixian257
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +4 myrtle 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-31 08:43 by 逸域隐帆
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +12 eulota 2026-08-26 12/600 2026-08-31 08:42 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +10 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 19/950 2026-08-31 08:01 by blueearth171
[基金申请] 有没有仍没收到信息的 +7 德尚中行 2026-08-27 8/400 2026-08-30 20:52 by purplejack
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +6 gdd2018 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 08:58 by 超级无敌华子
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-08-28 11:06 by maolC
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +5 ssyjh 2026-08-27 5/250 2026-08-27 20:50 by gdfollow
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[基金申请] 怎么看青基中了没有啊 +5 叶九微 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-27 10:35 by l_zh2008
[基金申请] 为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜? 10+3 majunge000 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-27 08:42 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 出来了 +9 trojank 2026-08-26 9/450 2026-08-26 14:25 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 国际合作可查了,中了面上 (EPI+1)(金币+50) +18 Ldrop2023 2026-08-26 18/900 2026-08-26 11:15 by cmrandy
[基金申请] 系统进不去 +4 yanglien 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 11:10 by wenfengw83
[基金申请] 项目信息和经费信息在系统里都可以看到了 +6 wittyboy 2026-08-26 14/700 2026-08-26 10:55 by wittyboy
[基金申请] 国合现在查不到了吗? +10 chengyan1220 2026-08-24 20/1000 2026-08-26 08:57 by peasantsprig
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
[基金申请] 没有任何消息-是不是就凉了 +9 图啦图啦 2026-08-24 10/500 2026-08-25 11:59 by 南海小哥
信息提示
请填处理意见